Environmental Risk Assessment of Dams by Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods: A Case Study of the Polrood Dam, Guilan Province, Iran

被引:17
|
作者
Ali, Jozi Seyed [1 ]
Maryam, Malmir [2 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Environm, North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
[2] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Environm & Energy, Sci & Res Branch, Tehran, Iran
来源
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT | 2014年 / 20卷 / 01期
关键词
environmental risk analysis; multi-criteria decision-making; analytical hierarchy process; TOPSIS; Polrood dam; Iran; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; TOPSIS; AHP;
D O I
10.1080/10807039.2012.725159
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
A dam's construction always imposes some risks to the environment. In this article, the environmental risks of the Polrood dam, located in a northern province of Iran, during its construction phase, were identified, ranked, and evaluated. The risk factors were initially identified by Delphi questionnaire and then rated using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Subsequently, the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) was applied to classify the risk factors into four major categories, and Expert Choice software was used to weight them. Based on the obtained results, Physicochemical; Biological; Economic, Social, and Cultural; and Health and Safety risks were rated by the weights of 0.124, 0.080, 0.048, and 0.021, respectively. Among the physicochemical risks, Erosion and Sedimentation weighted 0.061 and 0.047, respectively, were identified as the most serious risks. Among the biological risks, the highest negative impact was assigned to Land Cover with the weight of 0.189. In the third category, the most important risk was Population Displacement, weighted 0.114. Workers' Falls with the weight of 0.109 was also determined as the highest risk in the last category. A comprehensive risk response plan will be required for dealing with the identified risks and their mitigation.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 85
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Consensus among Multi-Criteria Decision-Making methods: Using methods as a voter
    Hocaoglu, M. Fatih
    Tosun, Emre
    JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE OF GAZI UNIVERSITY, 2024, 40 (01): : 103 - 120
  • [22] A comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Ceballos B.
    Lamata M.T.
    Pelta D.A.
    Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 2016, 5 (04) : 315 - 322
  • [23] Environmental risk assessment of dams at constructional phase using VIKOR and EFMEA methods (Case study: Balarood Dam, Iran)
    Darvishi, Sahar
    Jozi, Seyed Ali
    Malmasi, Saeed
    Rezaian, Sahar
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2020, 26 (04): : 1087 - 1107
  • [24] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Fuzzy Decision Problems: A Case Study in the Frozen Shrimp Industry
    Wang, Chia-Nan
    Nguyen, Van Thanh
    Kao, Jui-Chung
    Chen, Chih-Cheng
    Nguyen, Viet Tinh
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2021, 13 (03): : 1 - 18
  • [25] A REVIEW OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS FOR BUILDING ASSESSMENT, SELECTION, AND RETROFIT
    Villalba, Paola
    Sanchez-garrido, Antonio J.
    Yepes, Victor
    JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 30 (05) : 465 - 480
  • [26] Risk management in urban tunnels using methods of game theory and multi-criteria decision-making
    Nikkhah, M.
    Ghasvareh, M. A.
    Bahalgardi, N. Farzaneh
    JOURNAL OF MINING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 10 (03): : 597 - 611
  • [27] Methodology for Natech coupling risk assessment using correlative multi-criteria decision-making method
    Wang, Jiajun
    Weng, Wenguo
    JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2023, 83
  • [28] Spatial Prediction of Landslides Using Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods: A Case Study of the Saqqez-Marivan Mountain Road in Iran
    Tavakolifar, Rahim
    Shahabi, Himan
    Alizadeh, Mohsen
    Bateni, Sayed M.
    Hashim, Mazlan
    Shirzadi, Ataollah
    Ariffin, Effi Helmy
    Wolf, Isabelle D.
    Shojae Chaeikar, Saman
    LAND, 2023, 12 (06)
  • [29] Assessment of Financial Risk Prediction Models with Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods
    Salvador Sanchez, Jose
    Garcia, Vicente
    Isabel Marques, Ana
    NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING, ICONIP 2012, PT II, 2012, 7664 : 60 - 67
  • [30] Determination of Optimum Environmental Conservation: Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques
    Celik, H. Murat
    Turk, Ersin
    EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2011, 19 (03) : 479 - 499