Validation of the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) to assess a deceased donor's kidneys' outcome in a European cohort

被引:53
作者
Dahmen, Maximilian [1 ]
Becker, Felix [2 ]
Pavenstaedt, Hermann [1 ]
Suwelack, Barbara [1 ]
Schuette-Nuetgen, Katharina [1 ]
Reuter, Stefan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Munster, Div Gen Internal Med Nephrol & Rheumatol, Dept Internal Med D, Munster, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Munster, Dept Gen & Visceral Surg, Munster, Germany
关键词
RISK INDEX; RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION; GRAFT-SURVIVAL; SCORING SYSTEM; PREDICTOR; GLOMERULOSCLEROSIS; RECIPIENTS; STANDARD; AGE;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-019-47772-7
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) was introduced in the United States in 2014 to guide the decision making of clinicians with respect to accepting or declining a donated kidney. To evaluate whether the KDPI can be applied to a European cohort, we retrospectively assessed 580 adult patients who underwent renal transplantation (brain-dead donors) between January 2007 and December 2014 at our center and compared their KDPIs with their short- and long-term outcomes. This led to the observation of two associations: one between the KDPI and the estimated glomerular filtration rate at one year (1-y-eGFR) and the other between the KDPI and the death-censored allograft survival rate (both p < 0.001). Following this, the individual input factors of the KDPI were analyzed to assess their potential to evaluate the quality of a donor organ. We found that a donor's age alone is significantly predictive in terms of 1-y-eGFR and death-censored allograft survival (both p < 0.001). Therefore, a donor's age may serve as a simple reference for future graft function. Furthermore, we found that an organ with a low KDPI or from a young donor has an improved graft survival rate whereas kidneys with a high KDPI or from an older donor yield an inferior performance, but they are still acceptable. Therefore, we would not encourage defining a distinct KDPI cut-off in the decision-making process of accepting or declining a kidney graft.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[21]   Assessment of the Kidney Donor Profile Index in a European cohort [J].
Lehner, Lukas Johannes ;
Kleinsteuber, Anna ;
Halleck, Fabian ;
Khadzhynov, Dmytro ;
Schrezenmeier, Eva ;
Duerr, Michael ;
Eckardt, Kai-Uwe ;
Budde, Klemens ;
Staeck, Oliver .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 33 (08) :1465-1472
[22]   A review of utility-based allocation strategies to maximize graft years of deceased donor kidneys [J].
Lim, Wai H. ;
Chadban, Steve ;
Campbell, Scott ;
Cohney, Solomon ;
Russ, Graeme ;
McDonald, Stephen .
NEPHROLOGY, 2011, 16 (04) :368-376
[23]   Survival Benefit of Primary Deceased Donor Transplantation With High-KDPI Kidneys [J].
Massie, A. B. ;
Luo, X. ;
Chow, E. K. H. ;
Alejo, J. L. ;
Desai, N. M. ;
Segev, D. L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 14 (10) :2310-2316
[24]   Kidneys from deceased donors: Maximizing the value of a scarce resource [J].
Meier-Kriesche, HU ;
Schold, JD ;
Gaston, RS ;
Wadstrom, J ;
Kaplan, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 5 (07) :1725-1730
[25]  
Minakawa R, 1996, Transpl Immunol, V4, P309, DOI 10.1016/S0966-3274(96)80052-9
[26]   The maryland aggregate pathology index: A deceased donor kidney biopsy scoring system for predicting graft failure [J].
Munivenkatappa, R. B. ;
Schweitzer, E. J. ;
Papadimitriou, J. C. ;
Drachenberg, C. B. ;
Thom, K. A. ;
Perencevich, E. N. ;
Haririan, A. ;
Rasetto, F. ;
Cooper, M. ;
Campos, L. ;
Barth, R. N. ;
Bartlett, S. T. ;
Philosophe, B. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 8 (11) :2316-2324
[27]   Validation of the Prognostic Kidney Donor Risk Index Scoring System of Deceased Donors for Renal Transplantation in the Netherlands [J].
Peters-Sengers, Hessel ;
Heemskerk, Martin B. A. ;
Geskus, Ronald B. ;
Kers, Jesper ;
van der Heide, Jaap J. Homan ;
Berger, Stefan P. ;
Bemelman, Frederike J. .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 102 (01) :162-170
[28]   Does Kidney Donor Risk Index implementation lead to the transplantation of more and higher-quality donor kidneys? [J].
Philipse, Ester ;
Lee, Alison P. K. ;
Bracke, Bart ;
Hartman, Vera ;
Chapelle, Thierry ;
Roeyen, Geert ;
de Greef, Kathleen ;
Ysebaert, Dirk K. ;
van Beeumen, Gerda ;
Couttenye, Marie-Madeleine ;
Van Craenenbroeck, Amaryllis H. ;
Hellemans, Rachel ;
Bosmans, Jean-Louis ;
Abramowicz, Daniel .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 32 (11) :1934-1938
[29]   Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: An approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors [J].
Port, FK ;
Bragg-Gresham, JL ;
Metzger, RA ;
Dykstra, DM ;
Gillespie, BW ;
Young, EW ;
Delmonico, FL ;
Wynn, JJ ;
Merion, RM ;
Wolfe, RA ;
Held, PJ .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 74 (09) :1281-1286
[30]   Comparison of survival outcomes between Expanded Criteria Donor and Standard Criteria Donor kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Querard, Anne-Helene ;
Foucher, Yohann ;
Combescure, Christophe ;
Dantan, Etienne ;
Larmet, David ;
Lorent, Marine ;
Pouteau, Lise-Marie ;
Giral, Magali ;
Gillaizeau, Florence .
TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 29 (04) :403-415