A Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Thoracic Endovascular Repair for Acute Type B Aortic Dissection with Multichanneled and Double-Channeled Morphology

In this study, we aim to investigate the clinical features and outcomes of multichanneled aortic dissection (MCAD) and double-channeled aortic dissection (DCAD) in acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD) patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). In total, 479 consecutive acute TBAD patients treated with TEVAR from April 2002 to May 2020 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The MCAD group was defined as those of multichanneled morphology by initial computed tomography angiography (CTA) (n = 61), whereas the DCAD group was defined as those with double-channeled morphology by initial CTA (n = 418). The clinical and morphological characteristics and short-term and long-term adverse events (30-day and > 30 days) were recorded and evaluated. No significant differences were noted between the 2 groups as regards demographics, comorbidity profiles, or initial feature of CTA. The incidence of true lumen compression was found to be significantly lower in the MCAD group compared with the DCAD group (8.2% versus 20.8%, P < 0.05). During the 65.37 +/- 40.06 months of follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences in terms of 30-day mortality or the incidence of early adverse events between the 2 groups. The incidence rates of 5-year cumulative freedom from all-cause mortality and 5-year cumulative freedom from AD-related mortality were not significantly different between the MCAD and DCAD groups, whereas the 5-year cumulative freedom from adverse events were lower in the MCAD group compared to DCAD group (51.1% versus 72.5%, P < 0.05). In multivariate Cox regression models, only age > 60 years, pleural effusion, branch involvement, and length of the stent were independent predictors of mortality, whereas age > 60 years, pulse, pleural effusion, true lumen compression, widest diameter of the descending aorta, branch involvement, and length of stent were independent predictors of adverse aortic events. No significant difference was noted between the MCAD and DCAD groups in the 5-year mortality following, whereas patients with MCAD were found to have significantly lower AD-related events than patients with DCAD in long-term follow-up.