A comparison of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation combined with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases

被引:3
作者
Yang Xiaoming [1 ]
Wang Hong [1 ]
Zhao Quanlai [1 ]
Xu Hongguang [1 ]
Liu Ping [1 ]
Jin Yuelong [2 ]
机构
[1] Yijishan Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Wannan Med Coll, Wuhu 241001, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Wannan Med Coll, Dept Prevent Med, Wuhu 241002, Anhui, Peoples R China
关键词
unilateral pedicle screw fixation; bilateral pedicle screw fixation; lumbar degenerative diseases; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; STABILITY; SEGMENT; CAGES; SPINE;
D O I
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20141338
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Bilateral transpedicular screw fixation in conjunction with interbody fusion is widely used to treat lumbar degenerative diseases; however, there are some disadvantages of using this fixation system. This study comparatively analyzes the results of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation combined with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for one-level lumbar degenerative diseases. Methods Sixty-six cases with one-level lumbar degenerative diseases were studied. The patients were divided according to surgical approach into a unilateral group (Group A) and a bilateral group (Group B). The patients were evaluated for pain by visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Operating time, blood loss, duration of hospitalization, and complication rate were also evaluated. Patients were examined at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and every year thereafter. Results Group A patients' average preoperative VAS and ODI scores were 7.03 +/- 0.98 and (64.22 +/- 6.38)%, respectively, significantly decreased to 2.91 +/- 0.88 and (14.42 +/- 2.08)%, respectively, at the last follow-up (P=0.000). In Group B, the average preoperative VAS and ODI scores were 6.79 +/- 0.86 and (63.22 +/- 4.70)%, respectively, significantly decreased to 3.12 +/- 0.96 and (14.62 +/- 2.08)%, respectively, at the last follow-up (P=0.000). No significant difference in the duration of hospitalization was found between groups. Operating time and blood loss of (125.9 +/- 13.0) minutes and (211.4 +/- 28.3) ml, respectively, in Group A were significantly less than (165.2 +/- 15.3) minutes and (258.6 +/- 18.3) ml, respectively, in Group B (P=0.000). All patients achieved good bone union and had no pseudarthrosis at the last follow-up. Conclusions There are no clinical differences between unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation combined with TLIF for one-level lumbar degenerative diseases. Unilateral fixation reduces operating time, bleeding, and cost of hospitalization.
引用
收藏
页码:3592 / 3596
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Unilateral Versus Bilateral Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation in Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion [J].
Wen, Jiankun ;
Shi, Changgui ;
Yu, Lei ;
Wang, Shuang ;
Xi, Yanhai ;
Ye, Xiaojian .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 134 :E920-E927
[22]   Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation with anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a comparison of postoperative outcomes [J].
Levy, Hannah A. ;
Pumford, Andrew ;
Kelley, Brian ;
Allen, Tyler G. ;
Pinter, Zachariah W. ;
Girdler, Steven J. ;
Bydon, Mohamad ;
Fogelson, Jeremy L. ;
Elder, Benjamin D. ;
Currier, Bradford ;
Nassr, Ahmad N. ;
Karamian, Brian A. ;
Freedman, Brett A. ;
Sebastian, Arjun S. .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 33 (09) :3476-3483
[23]   A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Unilateral versus Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion [J].
Hu, Xu-Qi ;
Wu, Xin-Lei ;
Xu, Cong ;
Zheng, Xu-Hao ;
Jin, Yong-Long ;
Wu, Li-Jun ;
Wang, Xiang-Yang ;
Xu, Hua-Zi ;
Tian, Nai-Feng .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (01)
[24]   Biomechanical Comparison of Unilateral and Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation after Multilevel Lumbar Lateral Interbody Fusion [J].
Mok, James M. ;
Forsthoefel, Craig ;
Diaz, Roberto Leonardo ;
Lin, Ye ;
Amirouche, Farid .
GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 14 (05) :1524-1531
[25]   Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation with cage fusion in degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis [J].
Xiao, Shan-Wen ;
Jiang, Hua ;
Yang, Li-Jing ;
Xiao, Zeng-Ming .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 24 (04) :764-774
[26]   Radiographic Analysis of One-level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF) With Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases [J].
Shen, Xiaolong ;
Wang, Lei ;
Zhang, Hailong ;
Gu, Xin ;
Gu, Guangfei ;
He, Shisheng .
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2016, 29 (01) :E1-E8
[27]   Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using one diagonal fusion cage with unilateral pedicle screw fixation for treatment of massive lumbar disc herniation [J].
Chang-Qing Zhao ;
Wei Ding ;
Kai Zhang ;
Jie Zhao .
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2016, 50 :473-478
[28]   Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using unilateral pedicle screws and a translaminar screw [J].
Sethi, Anil ;
Lee, Sandra ;
Vaidya, Rahul .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 18 (03) :430-434
[29]   Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation: Comparison between Primary and Revision Surgery [J].
Kang, Moo Sung ;
Park, Jeong Yoon ;
Kim, Kyung Hyun ;
Kuh, Sung Uk ;
Chin, Dong Kyu ;
Kim, Keun Su ;
Cho, Yong Eun .
BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2014
[30]   Biomechanical study of unilateral pedicle screw combined with contralateral translaminar facet screw in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion [J].
Luo, Beier ;
Yan, Ming ;
Huang, Jinghui ;
Duan, Wei ;
Huang, Zhiping ;
Chen, Jianting ;
Luo, Zhuojing ;
Zhu, Qingan ;
Li, Ming .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2015, 30 (07) :657-661