A comparison of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation combined with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases

被引:3
|
作者
Yang Xiaoming [1 ]
Wang Hong [1 ]
Zhao Quanlai [1 ]
Xu Hongguang [1 ]
Liu Ping [1 ]
Jin Yuelong [2 ]
机构
[1] Yijishan Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Wannan Med Coll, Wuhu 241001, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Wannan Med Coll, Dept Prevent Med, Wuhu 241002, Anhui, Peoples R China
关键词
unilateral pedicle screw fixation; bilateral pedicle screw fixation; lumbar degenerative diseases; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; STABILITY; SEGMENT; CAGES; SPINE;
D O I
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20141338
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Bilateral transpedicular screw fixation in conjunction with interbody fusion is widely used to treat lumbar degenerative diseases; however, there are some disadvantages of using this fixation system. This study comparatively analyzes the results of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation combined with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for one-level lumbar degenerative diseases. Methods Sixty-six cases with one-level lumbar degenerative diseases were studied. The patients were divided according to surgical approach into a unilateral group (Group A) and a bilateral group (Group B). The patients were evaluated for pain by visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Operating time, blood loss, duration of hospitalization, and complication rate were also evaluated. Patients were examined at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and every year thereafter. Results Group A patients' average preoperative VAS and ODI scores were 7.03 +/- 0.98 and (64.22 +/- 6.38)%, respectively, significantly decreased to 2.91 +/- 0.88 and (14.42 +/- 2.08)%, respectively, at the last follow-up (P=0.000). In Group B, the average preoperative VAS and ODI scores were 6.79 +/- 0.86 and (63.22 +/- 4.70)%, respectively, significantly decreased to 3.12 +/- 0.96 and (14.62 +/- 2.08)%, respectively, at the last follow-up (P=0.000). No significant difference in the duration of hospitalization was found between groups. Operating time and blood loss of (125.9 +/- 13.0) minutes and (211.4 +/- 28.3) ml, respectively, in Group A were significantly less than (165.2 +/- 15.3) minutes and (258.6 +/- 18.3) ml, respectively, in Group B (P=0.000). All patients achieved good bone union and had no pseudarthrosis at the last follow-up. Conclusions There are no clinical differences between unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation combined with TLIF for one-level lumbar degenerative diseases. Unilateral fixation reduces operating time, bleeding, and cost of hospitalization.
引用
收藏
页码:3592 / 3596
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation combined with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases
    Yang Xiaoming
    Wang Hong
    Zhao Quanlai
    Xu Hongguang
    Liu Ping
    Jin Yuelong
    中华医学杂志(英文版), 2014, (20) : 3592 - 3596
  • [2] Unilateral pedicle screw fixation combined with lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases
    吴占勇
    China Medical Abstracts(Surgery), 2011, 20 (02) : 95 - 95
  • [3] Comparison of Unilateral versus Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single Level Lumbar Degenerative Diseases and Review of Literature
    Isik, Hasan Serdar
    Okutan, Ozerk
    Yildirim, Timur
    Akpinar, Elif
    Yilmaz, Ali
    TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 28 (05) : 731 - 739
  • [4] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using unilateral pedicle screw fixation plus contralateral translaminar facet screw fixation in lumbar degenerative diseases
    Fubing Liu
    Chun Jiang
    Yuanwu Cao
    Xiaoxing Jiang
    Zhenzhou Feng
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2014, 48 : 374 - 379
  • [5] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using unilateral pedicle screw fixation plus contralateral translaminar facet screw fixation in lumbar degenerative diseases
    Liu, Fubing
    Jiang, Chun
    Cao, Yuanwu
    Jiang, Xiaoxing
    Feng, Zhenzhou
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 48 (04) : 374 - 379
  • [6] Unilateral versus Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation Combined with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Low Lumbar Degenerative Disc Diseases: Analysis of Clinical and Radiographic Results
    Chen, De-jian
    Yao, Cong
    Song, Quanwei
    Tang, Benyu
    Liu, Xuqiang
    Zhang, Bin
    Dai, Min
    Nie, Tao
    Wan, Zongmiao
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 115 : E516 - E522
  • [7] Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar diseases
    Xue, Huaming
    Tu, Yihui
    Cai, Minwei
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 12 (03): : 209 - 215
  • [8] Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of lumbar foraminal stenosis
    Cheng, Xiaofei
    Zhang, Kai
    Sun, Xiaojiang
    Tian, Haijun
    Zhao, Changqing
    Zhao, Jie
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 22 (10): : 1687 - 1693
  • [9] Clinical Effect of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Unilateral Pedicle Fixation on Elderly Lumbar Degenerative Diseases
    Zhang, J. Q.
    Zeng, Z. Y.
    Ye, Z. M.
    Song, Y. X.
    Han, J. F.
    Ji, J. F.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2015, 63 : S409 - S409
  • [10] Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Unilateral Pedicle Screw and Contralateral Percutaneous Transfacet Screw Fixation for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disorders
    Luo, Peng
    Shao, Rong-Xue
    Wu, Ai-Min
    Xu, Hua-Zi
    Chi, Yong-Long
    Lin, Yan
    TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 26 (05) : 763 - 770