The importance of microscopic characterization of membrane biofilms in an unconfined environment

被引:25
作者
Bar-Zeev, Edo [1 ]
Zodrow, Katherine R. [1 ]
Kwan, Sarah E. [1 ]
Elimelech, Menachem [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Dept Chem & Environm Engn, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Biofilm; Biofouling; CLSM; Unconfined; RO membrane; REVERSE-OSMOSIS MEMBRANES; PSEUDOMONAS-AERUGINOSA; BACTERIAL BIOFILMS; DESALINATION; ARCHITECTURE; RELEASE;
D O I
10.1016/j.desal.2014.06.003
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) is often used to evaluate biofilm development or biofouling mitigation in membrane systems. However, several methods of CLSM sample preparation exist. In this paper, we evaluate the effects of three preparation techniques - dry, confined (wet), and unconfined (immersed) mounting - on CLSM-derived biofilm architecture and dimensions. Although placing a wet or dry biofilm between a slide and a coverslip before viewing is relatively common, our results show that this confinement significantly alters the biofilm observed. Therefore, biofilms should be viewed in an unconfined and hydrated state that allows for full extension of the biofilm structure in a media-filled viewing well of fixed depth (similar to 250 mu m). Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms were grown on thin-film composite reverse osmosis membranes and glass coupons. Dry and confined mounting of 24 and 48 h biofilms resulted in biofilms with low 3-D complexity and thickness (14 and 18 mu m, respectively). Measured biofilm thickness was significantly higher on samples prepared using unconfined mounting (55 mu m). Additionally, the reduction in biofilm thickness and biovolume observed after treatment with biocidal compounds was significantly less on the dry and confined biofilms than the unconfined samples. Our results strongly suggest that biofilms on membranes be prepared for microscopy using unconfined mounting to accurately assess biofilm structure and dimensions. Unconfined mounting will allow for accurate CLSM assessment of membrane biofilm structure, dimensions, and biofouling mitigation measures in membrane systems. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 15
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [21] Investigation of environmental influences on membrane biofouling in a Southern California desalination pilot plant
    Huang, Siqian
    Voutchkov, Nikolay
    Jiang, Sunny C.
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2013, 319 : 1 - 9
  • [22] Development of antifouling reverse osmosis membranes for water treatment: A review
    Kang, Guo-dong
    Cao, Yi-ming
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2012, 46 (03) : 584 - 600
  • [23] Biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa wild type, flagella and type IV pili mutants
    Klausen, M
    Heydorn, A
    Ragas, P
    Lambertsen, L
    Aaes-Jorgensen, A
    Molin, S
    Tolker-Nielsen, T
    [J]. MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 48 (06) : 1511 - 1524
  • [24] Reducing Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation on stainless steel 316L using functionalized self-assembled monolayers
    Kruszewski, Kristen M.
    Nistico, Laura
    Longwell, Mark J.
    Hynes, Matthew J.
    Maurer, Joshua A.
    Hall-Stoodley, Luanne
    Gawalt, Ellen S.
    [J]. MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING C-MATERIALS FOR BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2013, 33 (04): : 2059 - 2069
  • [25] Modulation of eDNA Release and Degradation Affects Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Maturation
    Mann, Ethan E.
    Rice, Kelly C.
    Boles, Blaise R.
    Endres, Jennifer L.
    Ranjit, Dev
    Chandramohan, Lakshmi
    Tsang, Laura H.
    Smeltzer, Mark S.
    Horswill, Alexander R.
    Bayles, Kenneth W.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2009, 4 (06):
  • [26] Biofouling in reverse osmosis membranes for seawater desalination: Phenomena and prevention
    Matin, Asif
    Khan, Z.
    Zaidi, S. M. J.
    Boyce, M. C.
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2011, 281 : 1 - 16
  • [27] Advanced imaging techniques for assessment of structure, composition and function in biofilm systems
    Neu, Thomas R.
    Manz, Bertram
    Volke, Frank
    Dynes, James J.
    Hitchcock, Adam P.
    Lawrence, John R.
    [J]. FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY, 2010, 72 (01) : 1 - 21
  • [28] Palmer R.J., 2006, CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY, P870
  • [29] Pawley J., 2005, Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy, V3rd
  • [30] Phipps D, 1999, METHOD ENZYMOL, V310, P178