The importance of microscopic characterization of membrane biofilms in an unconfined environment

被引:25
作者
Bar-Zeev, Edo [1 ]
Zodrow, Katherine R. [1 ]
Kwan, Sarah E. [1 ]
Elimelech, Menachem [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Dept Chem & Environm Engn, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Biofilm; Biofouling; CLSM; Unconfined; RO membrane; REVERSE-OSMOSIS MEMBRANES; PSEUDOMONAS-AERUGINOSA; BACTERIAL BIOFILMS; DESALINATION; ARCHITECTURE; RELEASE;
D O I
10.1016/j.desal.2014.06.003
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) is often used to evaluate biofilm development or biofouling mitigation in membrane systems. However, several methods of CLSM sample preparation exist. In this paper, we evaluate the effects of three preparation techniques - dry, confined (wet), and unconfined (immersed) mounting - on CLSM-derived biofilm architecture and dimensions. Although placing a wet or dry biofilm between a slide and a coverslip before viewing is relatively common, our results show that this confinement significantly alters the biofilm observed. Therefore, biofilms should be viewed in an unconfined and hydrated state that allows for full extension of the biofilm structure in a media-filled viewing well of fixed depth (similar to 250 mu m). Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms were grown on thin-film composite reverse osmosis membranes and glass coupons. Dry and confined mounting of 24 and 48 h biofilms resulted in biofilms with low 3-D complexity and thickness (14 and 18 mu m, respectively). Measured biofilm thickness was significantly higher on samples prepared using unconfined mounting (55 mu m). Additionally, the reduction in biofilm thickness and biovolume observed after treatment with biocidal compounds was significantly less on the dry and confined biofilms than the unconfined samples. Our results strongly suggest that biofilms on membranes be prepared for microscopy using unconfined mounting to accurately assess biofilm structure and dimensions. Unconfined mounting will allow for accurate CLSM assessment of membrane biofilm structure, dimensions, and biofouling mitigation measures in membrane systems. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 15
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Combination of microscopic techniques reveals a comprehensive visual impression of biofilm structure and composition
    Alhede, Morten
    Qvortrup, Klaus
    Liebrechts, Ramon
    Hoiby, Niels
    Givskov, Michael
    Bjarnsholt, Thomas
    [J]. FEMS IMMUNOLOGY AND MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 65 (02): : 335 - 342
  • [2] Banin E., 2006, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V72, P5238
  • [3] Bar-zeev E., 2014, ENV SCI TECHNOL LETT, P10
  • [4] Revised paradigm of aquatic biofilm formation facilitated by microgel transparent exopolymer particles
    Bar-Zeev, Edo
    Berman-Frank, Ilana
    Girshevitz, Olga
    Berman, Tom
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2012, 109 (23) : 9119 - 9124
  • [5] Beer D, 2013, PROKARYOTES, P343
  • [6] Biofilm Formation on Reverse Osmosis Membranes Is Initiated and Dominated by Sphingomonas spp.
    Bereschenko, L. A.
    Stams, A. J. M.
    Euverink, G. J. W.
    van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.
    [J]. APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2010, 76 (08) : 2623 - 2632
  • [7] Flagellum-independent surface migration of Vibrio cholerae and Escherichia coli
    Brown, II
    Häse, CC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 2001, 183 (12) : 3784 - 3790
  • [8] Direct estimation of biofilm density on different pipe material coupons using a specific DNA-probe
    Chang, YC
    Le Puil, M
    Biggerstaff, J
    Randall, AA
    Schulte, A
    Taylor, JS
    [J]. MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR PROBES, 2003, 17 (05) : 237 - 243
  • [9] deBeer D, 1997, BIOTECHNOL BIOENG, V53, P151, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19970120)53:2<151::AID-BIT4>3.0.CO
  • [10] 2-N