The Importance of Body Size Standardization in Functional Diversity Studies of Dung Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae)

被引:2
作者
Gimenez Gomez, Victoria C. [1 ]
Tonelli, Mattia [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Misiones CONICET, Inst Biol Subtrop, Bertoni 85, RA-3370 Puerto Iguazu, Misiones, Argentina
[2] Univ Urbino Carlo Bo, Dept Biomol Sci, I-61029 Urbino, PU, Italy
关键词
morphology; wet weight; dry weight; Canthon quinquemaculatus; Deltochilum komareki; Eurysternus parallelus; ECOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS; ATLANTIC FOREST; BIODIVERSITY; TRAIT; SUCCESS; RESTORATION; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1649/0010-065X-76.4.497
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Functional diversity approaches, which are based on an organism's trait pattern, are of increasing interest in ecological studies. However, there are no rules setting the number or kinds of traits that should be assessed; hence, researchers are left to make their own decisions in this regard. Moreover, in some cases, the same trait could be assessed using different procedures, making comparisons between studies potentially difficult. Such is the case of dung beetle body size. We found that it was measured by using eight different methods in the literature. Using three scarabaeine dung beetle species (Canthon quinquemaculatus Castelnau, Deltochilum komareki Balthasar, and Eurysternus parallelus Castelnau), eight methods of measuring dung beetle body size (wet weight, dry weight, wet weight x clypeal-pygidial length, clypeal-pygidial length, pronotal-pygidial length, clypeal-elytral length, pronotal-elytral length, and elytral width x pronotal-elytral length) were compared to determine if they are equivalent. Using a Spearman correlation coefficient, not all the measurement methods were found to be equivalent. Wet and dry weight were the least correlated with all other methods. Hence, to standardize measurement methods in future studies, dry body weight is suggested for use, which also has the advantage of being an easy method to use. Standardization will allow more reliable and accurate comparisons between studies.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 502
页数:6
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Andresen Ellen, 2005, P331, DOI 10.1079/9780851998060.0331
[2]   Dung beetles as indicators of tropical forest restoration success: Is it possible to recover species and functional diversity? [J].
Audino, Livia Dorneles ;
Louzada, Julio ;
Comita, Liza .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2014, 169 :248-257
[3]   Effects of paracoprid dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) on the growth of pasture herbage and on the underlying soil [J].
Bang, HS ;
Lee, JH ;
Kwon, OS ;
Na, YE ;
Jang, YS ;
Kim, WH .
APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 2005, 29 (02) :165-171
[4]   The Role of Species Traits in Mediating Functional Recovery during Matrix Restoration [J].
Barnes, Andrew D. ;
Emberson, Rowan M. ;
Krell, Frank-Thorsten ;
Didham, Raphael K. .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (12)
[5]   Negative Impacts of Human Land Use on Dung Beetle Functional Diversity [J].
Barragan, Felipe ;
Moreno, Claudia E. ;
Escobar, Federico ;
Halffter, Gonzalo ;
Navarrete, Dario .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (03)
[6]   Spatial and temporal shifts in functional and taxonomic diversity of dung beetles in a human-modified tropical forest landscape [J].
Beiroz, Wallace ;
Sayer, Emma ;
Slade, Eleanor M. ;
Audino, Livia ;
Braga, Rodrigo Fagundes ;
Louzada, Julio ;
Barlow, Jos .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 95 :518-526
[7]   Stronger dung removal in forests compared with grassland is driven by trait composition and biomass of dung beetles [J].
Buse, Joern ;
Entling, Martin H. .
ECOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2020, 45 (02) :223-231
[8]  
Carvalho M. S., 2018, THESIS U BRASILIA BR
[9]   Tropical forest subjected to intensive post-logging silviculture maintains functionally diverse dung beetle communities [J].
Cerullo, G. R. ;
Edwards, F. A. ;
Mills, S. C. ;
Edwards, D. P. .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 444 :318-326
[10]   Nesting strategies affect altitudinal distribution and habitat use in Alpine dung beetle communities [J].
Chamberlain, Dan ;
Tocco, Claudia ;
Longoni, Alice ;
Mammola, Stefano ;
Palestrini, Claudia ;
Rolando, Antonio .
ECOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2015, 40 (04) :372-380