Independent calculation of dose from a helical TomoTherapy unit

被引:19
作者
Gibbons, John P. [1 ,2 ]
Smith, Koren [2 ]
Cheek, Dennis [1 ]
Rosen, Isaac [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mary Bird Perkins Canc Ctr, Baton Rouge, LA USA
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2009年 / 10卷 / 01期
关键词
IMRT; TomoTherapy; monitor unit calculation; dose calculation; independent dose verification; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY COMMITTEE; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; IMRT; VERIFICATION; SCATTER; IRRADIATION; DOSIMETRY; DELIVERY; BEAMS;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v10i1.2772
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A new calculation algorithm has been developed for independently verifying doses calculated by the TomoTherapy (R) Hi.Art (R) treatment planning system (TPS). The algorithm is designed to confirm the dose to a point in a high dose, low dose-gradient region. Patient data used by the algorithm include the radiological depth to the point for each projection angle and the treatment sinogram file controlling the leaf opening time for each projection. The algorithm uses common dosimetric functions [tissue phantom ratio (TPR) and output factor (S-cp)] for the central axis combined with lateral and longitudinal beam profile data to quantify the off-axis dose dependence. Machine data for the dosimetric functions were measured on the Hi.Art machine and simulated using the TPS. Point dose calculations were made for several test phantoms and for 97 patient treatment plans using the simulated machine data. Comparisons with TPS-predicted point doses for the phantom treatment plans demonstrated agreement within 2% for both on-axis and off-axis planning target volumes (PTVs). Comparisons with TPS-predicted point doses for the patient treatment plans also showed good agreement. For calculations at sites other than lung and superficial PTVs, agreement between the calculations was within 2% for 94% of the patient calculations (64 of 68). Calculations within lung and superficial PTVs overestimated the dose by an average of 3.1% (sigma=2.4%) and 3.2% (sigma=2.2%), respectively. Systematic errors within lung are probably due to the weakness of the algorithm in correcting for missing tissue and/or tissue density heterogeneities. Errors encountered within superficial PTVs probably result from the algorithm overestimating the scatter dose within the patient. Our results demonstrate that for the majority of cases, the algorithm could be used without further refinement to independently verify patient treatment plans.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 119
页数:17
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Ayyangar K M, 2001, Med Dosim, V26, P29, DOI 10.1016/S0958-3947(00)00057-1
  • [2] A separated primary and scatter model for independent dose calculation of intensity modulated radiotherapy
    Baker, Colin R.
    Clements, Richard
    Gately, Alan
    Budgell, Geoff J.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 80 (03) : 385 - 390
  • [3] Clinical helical tomotherapy commissioning dosimetry
    Balog, J
    Olivera, G
    Kapatoes, J
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (12) : 3097 - 3106
  • [4] Characterization of the output for helical delivery of intensity modulated slit beams
    Balog, JP
    Mackie, TR
    Reckwerdt, P
    Glass, M
    Angelos, L
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (01) : 55 - 64
  • [5] Theoretical considerations of monitor unit calculations for intensity modulated beam treatment planning
    Boyer, A
    Xing, L
    Ma, CM
    Curran, B
    Hill, R
    Kania, A
    Bleier, A
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (02) : 187 - 195
  • [6] A dose verification method using a monitor unit matrix for dynamic IMRT on Varian linear accelerators
    Chen, XG
    Yue, NJ
    Chen, WM
    Saw, CB
    Heron, DE
    Stefanik, D
    Antemann, R
    Huq, MS
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (23) : 5641 - 5652
  • [7] Clarkson JR., 1941, BRIT J RADIOL, V14, P265, DOI DOI 10.1259/0007-1285-14-164-265
  • [8] Day M J, 1996, BJR Suppl, V25, P138
  • [9] Patient-specific point dose measurement for IMRT monitor unit verification
    Dong, L
    Antolak, J
    Salehpour, M
    Forster, K
    O'Neill, L
    Kendall, R
    Rosen, I
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 56 (03): : 867 - 877
  • [10] Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: Report of the IMRT subcommittee of the AAPM radiation therapy committee
    Ezzell, GA
    Galvin, JM
    Low, D
    Palta, JR
    Rosen, I
    Sharpe, MB
    Xia, P
    Xiao, Y
    Xing, L
    Yu, CX
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (08) : 2089 - 2115