Building Consensus? The Production of a Water Conservation Discourse Through Twitter: The Water use it Wisely Campaign in Arizona

被引:16
作者
Boyer, Anne-Lise [1 ]
Vaudor, Lise [2 ]
Le Lay, Yves-Francois [3 ]
Marty, Pascal [3 ]
机构
[1] ENS LYON, Dept Geog, UMR Environm Ville Soc 5600, Lyon, France
[2] ENS LYON, UMR Environm Ville Soc 5600, Lyon, France
[3] Univ Paris I Pantheon Sorbonne, Dept Geog, LADYSS UMR 7573, Paris, France
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION-A JOURNAL OF NATURE AND CULTURE | 2021年 / 15卷 / 03期
关键词
Water conservation; public campaign; Twitter; lexicometry; Arizona; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SOCIAL MEDIA; SUSTAINABILITY; POLITICS; DROUGHT; COMMUNICATION; URBANIZATION; CONSUMPTION; MANAGEMENT; FUKUSHIMA;
D O I
10.1080/17524032.2020.1821743
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
In the context of global environmental changes, water scarcity has become a challenge, especially for rapidly urbanizing regions. Water conservation-demand management-has therefore become an important tool for managing water resources. Since communication is at the core of water conservation strategies, we use Twitter data to trace the construction process of a widespread discourse at the global scale. We conduct a quantitative textual analysis of the Water-Use It Wisely Twitter timeline dedicated to promoting water conservation in Arizona. Based on the text of 3500 tweets and profile descriptions of 15,204 related Twitter accounts, our results show that Twitter is used to convey a standardized water conservation message that finds an audience worldwide, even though some countries block the use of Twitter or use other technical tools. This communication aspect on social media, where a network of water professionals and a community of water activists can interact, works as a cornerstone in the construction of an institutional consensus around this new paradigm of water management.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 300
页数:16
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   Between Fragmentation and Dialogue. Twitter Communities and Political Debate About the Swiss "Nuclear Withdrawal Initiative" [J].
Arlt, Dorothee ;
Rauchfleisch, Adrian ;
Schaefer, Mike S. .
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION-A JOURNAL OF NATURE AND CULTURE, 2019, 13 (04) :440-456
[2]   Merging Duke Energy and Progress Energy: Online Public Discourse, Post-Fukushima Reactions, and the Absence of Environmental Communication [J].
Autry, Meagan Kittle ;
Kelly, Ashley R. .
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION-A JOURNAL OF NATURE AND CULTURE, 2012, 6 (02) :278-284
[3]   Strong versus weak sustainability: Economics, natural sciences, and "consilience" [J].
Ayres, RU ;
van den Bergh, JCJM ;
Gowdy, JM .
ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2001, 23 (02) :155-168
[4]   Figuring Out #Fukushima: An Initial Look at Functions and Content of US Twitter Commentary About Nuclear Risk [J].
Binder, Andrew R. .
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION-A JOURNAL OF NATURE AND CULTURE, 2012, 6 (02) :268-277
[5]   From the Blackhand Side: Twitter as a Cultural Conversation [J].
Brock, Andre .
JOURNAL OF BROADCASTING & ELECTRONIC MEDIA, 2012, 56 (04) :529-549
[6]   Why a Water Soft Path, Why Now and What Then? [J].
Brooks, David B. ;
Brandes, Oliver M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 27 (02) :315-344
[7]   From Environmental Campaigns to Advancing the Public Dialog: Environmental Communication for Civic Engagement [J].
Brulle, Robert J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION-A JOURNAL OF NATURE AND CULTURE, 2010, 4 (01) :82-98
[8]   The eco-scalar fix: rescaling environmental governance and the politics of ecological boundaries in Alberta, Canada [J].
Cohen, Alice ;
Bakker, Karen .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING D-SOCIETY & SPACE, 2014, 32 (01) :128-146
[9]  
Colby BG, 2007, ISSUES WATER RESOURC, P1
[10]   Water management: Current and future challenges and research directions [J].
Cosgrove, William J. ;
Loucks, Daniel P. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2015, 51 (06) :4823-4839