Evaluation of the combined effect of factors influencing bowel preparation and adenoma detection rates in patients undergoing colonoscopy

被引:11
作者
Tariq, Hassan [1 ,2 ]
Komal, Muhammad Umar [1 ]
Sapkota, Binita [1 ]
ElShikh, Fady [1 ]
Pirzada, Usman Ali [1 ]
Pullela, Nanda [1 ]
Azam, Sara [1 ]
Zhang, Aiyi [1 ]
Baiomi, Ahmed [1 ,2 ]
Abbas, Hafsa [1 ,2 ]
Makker, Jasbir [1 ,2 ]
Balar, Bhavna [1 ,2 ]
Ihimoyan, Ariyo [1 ,2 ]
Daniel, Myrta [1 ,2 ]
Dev, Anil [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] BronxCare Hlth Syst, Dept Med, New York, NY 10456 USA
[2] BronxCare Hlth Syst, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Med, New York, NY USA
来源
BMJ OPEN GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2019年 / 6卷 / 01期
关键词
COLORECTAL-CANCER; DIET LIBERALIZATION; QUALITY INDICATORS; WITHDRAWAL TIMES; IMPACT; POLYPECTOMY; EFFICACY; SPLIT; RISK;
D O I
10.1136/bmjgast-2018-000254
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Colonoscopy is a commonly used modality for screening and surveillance of colorectal cancer (CRC). Therefore, it is essential to have adequate bowel preparation (prep) for the procedure which depends on type of bowel regimens, diet before colonoscopy and timing of the procedure. Aims The purpose of this study is to analyse the effect of multiple factors on adenoma detection rate (ADR) and prep quality of colonoscopy. This is the also the first study determining outcomes based on various combinations of diet, timing of the procedure and bowel prep regimens. Methods This is a retrospective single-centre observational study. Data about diet before procedure, bowel prepprep regimen and timing of the procedure was collected for patients coming for screening colonoscopy. Results Patients with split prep had higher good prep rates (73.8% vs 56.2%) and higher ADRs (34.2 % vs 29.9%) as compared with non-split prep. The good prep quality (65.8% vs 62.1%) and ADRs (31.9% vs 31.5%) were comparable in patients who received clear liquid diet as compared with low residue diet. The good results of bowel prep were obtained with split prep with either clear liquids or low residue diet irrespective of the timing of procedure. The poor prep was noticed in patients who underwent procedure in afternoon, with a low restrictive diet and non-split bowel regimen. Conclusions The current study adds to our knowledge about the combined effect of multiple variables affecting the bowel prep quality and ADR. It is imperative to opt for the best combination required for colonoscopy, as this will influence the effectiveness of colonoscopies regarding timely cancer detection and prevention.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Suboptimal Bowel Preparation in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Undergoing Colonoscopy
    Dai, Cong
    Jiang, Min
    Huang, Yu-hong
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2022, 67 (11) : 5353 - 5354
  • [22] Effect of simply recording colonoscopy withdrawal time on polyp and adenoma detection rates
    Taber, Andrew
    Romagnuolo, Joseph
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 71 (04) : 782 - 786
  • [23] Effect of supplemental simethicone for bowel preparation on adenoma detection during colonoscopy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Pan, Peng
    Zhao, Sheng-Bing
    Li, Bing-Han
    Meng, Qian-Qian
    Yao, Jun
    Wang, Dong
    Li, Zhao-Shen
    Bai, Yu
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 34 (02) : 314 - 320
  • [24] Validation of a Patient Satisfaction Scale in Patients Undergoing Bowel Preparation Prior to Colonoscopy
    Hatoum, Hind T.
    Lin, Swu-Jane
    Joseph, Raymond E.
    Dahdal, David N.
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2016, 9 (01) : 27 - 34
  • [25] Split-Dose Bowel Preparation Reduces the Need for Early Repeat Colonoscopy Without Improving Adenoma Detection Rate
    Wang, Li
    Sprung, Brandon S.
    DeCross, Arthur J.
    Marino, Danielle
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2018, 63 (05) : 1320 - 1326
  • [26] Colonoscopy bowel preparation quality improvement for patients with decompensated cirrhosis undergoing evaluation for liver transplantation
    Clayton, Donnesha B.
    Palmer, William C.
    Robison, Sarah W.
    Heckman, Michael G.
    Chimato, Nicolette T.
    Harnois, Denise M.
    Francis, Dawn L.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 30 (10) : 1236 - 1241
  • [27] Factors influencing variation in physician adenoma detection rates: a theory-based approach for performance improvement
    Atkins, Louise
    Hunkeler, Enid M.
    Jensen, Christopher D.
    Michie, Susan
    Lee, Jeffrey K.
    Doubeni, Chyke A.
    Zauber, Ann G.
    Levin, Theodore R.
    Quinn, Virginia P.
    Corley, Douglas A.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 83 (03) : 617 - U406
  • [28] Efficacy of a multifactorial strategy for bowel preparation in diabetic patients undergoing colonoscopy: a randomized trial
    Antonio Alvarez-Gonzalez, Marco
    Flores-Le Roux, Juana A.
    Seoane, Agustin
    Pedro-Botet, Juan
    Carot, Laura
    Fernandez-Clotet, Agnes
    Raga, Agnes
    Pantaleon, Miguel A.
    Barranco, Luis
    Bory, Felipe
    Lorenzo-Zuniga, Vicente
    ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 48 (11) : 1003 - 1009
  • [29] Relationship between Health Literacy and Knowledge, Compliance with Bowel Preparation, and Bowel Cleanliness in Older Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy
    Gwag, Minju
    Yoo, Jaeyong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (05)
  • [30] Risk Factors for Suboptimal Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in Pediatric Patients
    Reddy, Pooja
    Mencin, Ali
    Lebwohl, Benjamin
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 2021, 73 (01) : E1 - E6