Evaluation of the combined effect of factors influencing bowel preparation and adenoma detection rates in patients undergoing colonoscopy

被引:11
作者
Tariq, Hassan [1 ,2 ]
Komal, Muhammad Umar [1 ]
Sapkota, Binita [1 ]
ElShikh, Fady [1 ]
Pirzada, Usman Ali [1 ]
Pullela, Nanda [1 ]
Azam, Sara [1 ]
Zhang, Aiyi [1 ]
Baiomi, Ahmed [1 ,2 ]
Abbas, Hafsa [1 ,2 ]
Makker, Jasbir [1 ,2 ]
Balar, Bhavna [1 ,2 ]
Ihimoyan, Ariyo [1 ,2 ]
Daniel, Myrta [1 ,2 ]
Dev, Anil [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] BronxCare Hlth Syst, Dept Med, New York, NY 10456 USA
[2] BronxCare Hlth Syst, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Med, New York, NY USA
来源
BMJ OPEN GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2019年 / 6卷 / 01期
关键词
COLORECTAL-CANCER; DIET LIBERALIZATION; QUALITY INDICATORS; WITHDRAWAL TIMES; IMPACT; POLYPECTOMY; EFFICACY; SPLIT; RISK;
D O I
10.1136/bmjgast-2018-000254
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Colonoscopy is a commonly used modality for screening and surveillance of colorectal cancer (CRC). Therefore, it is essential to have adequate bowel preparation (prep) for the procedure which depends on type of bowel regimens, diet before colonoscopy and timing of the procedure. Aims The purpose of this study is to analyse the effect of multiple factors on adenoma detection rate (ADR) and prep quality of colonoscopy. This is the also the first study determining outcomes based on various combinations of diet, timing of the procedure and bowel prep regimens. Methods This is a retrospective single-centre observational study. Data about diet before procedure, bowel prepprep regimen and timing of the procedure was collected for patients coming for screening colonoscopy. Results Patients with split prep had higher good prep rates (73.8% vs 56.2%) and higher ADRs (34.2 % vs 29.9%) as compared with non-split prep. The good prep quality (65.8% vs 62.1%) and ADRs (31.9% vs 31.5%) were comparable in patients who received clear liquid diet as compared with low residue diet. The good results of bowel prep were obtained with split prep with either clear liquids or low residue diet irrespective of the timing of procedure. The poor prep was noticed in patients who underwent procedure in afternoon, with a low restrictive diet and non-split bowel regimen. Conclusions The current study adds to our knowledge about the combined effect of multiple variables affecting the bowel prep quality and ADR. It is imperative to opt for the best combination required for colonoscopy, as this will influence the effectiveness of colonoscopies regarding timely cancer detection and prevention.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of quality of bowel preparation on quality indicators of adenoma detection rates and colonoscopy completion rates
    Rai, Tarun
    Navaneethan, Udayakumar
    Gohel, Tushar
    Podugu, Amareshwar
    Thota, Prashanthi N.
    Kiran, Ravi P.
    Lopez, Rocio
    Sanaka, Madhusudhan R.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY REPORT, 2016, 4 (02): : 148 - 153
  • [2] PATIENT AND COLONOSCOPY FACTORS INFLUENCING ADENOMA DETECTION IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING COLONOSCOPY IN THE NHS BOWEL CANCER SCREENING PROGRAMME
    Lee, T. J. W.
    Rees, C. J.
    Blanks, R. G.
    Moss, S. M.
    Nickerson, C.
    Wright, K. C.
    James, P. W.
    McNally, R. J. Q.
    Patnick, J.
    Rutter, M. D.
    GUT, 2011, 60 : A68 - A68
  • [3] The effect of colonoscopy preparation quality on adenoma detection rates
    Sherer, Eric A.
    Imler, Timothy D.
    Imperiale, Thomas F.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (03) : 545 - 553
  • [4] The impact of fair colonoscopy preparation on colonoscopy use and adenoma miss rates in patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy
    Menees, Stacy B.
    Kim, H. Myra
    Elliott, Eric E.
    Mickevicius, Jennifer L.
    Graustein, Brittany B.
    Schoenfeld, Philip S.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2013, 78 (03) : 510 - 516
  • [5] Bowel preparation in diabetic patients undergoing colonoscopy
    Agha, Osama Qasim
    Alsayid, Muhammad
    Brown, Michael D.
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 34 (03): : 310 - 315
  • [6] Adenoma detection in patients undergoing a comprehensive colonoscopy screening
    Raju, Gottumukkala S.
    Vadyala, Vikram
    Slack, Rebecca
    Krishna, Somashekar G.
    Ross, William A.
    Lynch, Patrick M.
    Bresalier, Robert S.
    Hawk, Ernest
    Stroehlein, John R.
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2013, 2 (03): : 391 - 402
  • [7] Effect of Functional Status on the Quality of Bowel Preparation in Elderly Patients Undergoing Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy
    Kumar, Akash
    Lin, Lisa
    Bernheim, Oren
    Bagiella, Emilia
    Jandorf, Lina
    Itzkowitz, Steven H.
    Shah, Brijen J.
    GUT AND LIVER, 2016, 10 (04) : 569 - 573
  • [8] Determinants of Bowel Preparation Quality and Its Association With Adenoma Detection A Prospective Colonoscopy Study
    Wong, Martin C. S.
    Ching, Jessica Y. L.
    Chan, Victor C. W.
    Lam, Thomas Y. T.
    Luk, Arthur K. C.
    Tang, Raymond S. Y.
    Wong, Sunny H.
    Ng, Siew C.
    Ng, Simon S. M.
    Wu, Justin C. Y.
    Chan, Francis K. L.
    Sung, Joseph J. Y.
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (02)
  • [9] Predictors of Failed Conscious Sedation in Patients Undergoing an Outpatient Colonoscopy and Implications for the Adenoma Detection Rate
    Cassell, Benjamin E.
    Ross, Kristina
    Chang, Tae Y.
    Austin, Gregory L.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [10] Predictive factors for missed adenoma on repeat colonoscopy in patients with suboptimal bowel preparation on initial colonoscopy: A KASID multicenter study
    Chang, Ji Young
    Moon, Chang Mo
    Lee, Hyun Jung
    Yang, Hyo-Joon
    Jung, Yunho
    Kim, Sang Wook
    Jung, Sung-Ae
    Byeon, Jeong-Sik
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (04):