Semiautomatic analysis of phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging of cerebrospinal fluid flow through the aqueduct of Sylvius

被引:32
作者
Florez, Yudy Natalia
Moratal, David
Forner, Juana
Marti-Bonmati, Luis
Arana, Estanislao
Guajardo-Hernandez, Ulises
Millet-Roig, Jose
机构
[1] Resonancia Magnet, Serv Radiol, Clin Quiron, Valencia 46010, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Valencia, Grp BET, E-46071 Valencia, Spain
[3] Hosp Univ Dr Peset, Valencia, Spain
关键词
aliasing correction; cerebrospinal fluid; magnetic resonance; phase imaging; segmentation algorithm;
D O I
10.1007/s10334-006-0030-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: Quantification of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow through the aqueduct of Sylvius by means of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is subject to interobserver variability due to the region of interest (ROI) selection. Our objective is to develop a semiautomatic measurement method to achieve reproducible quantitative analysis of CSF flow rate and stroke volume. Material and methods: MR examinations were performed using a 1.5 T scanner with a phase contrast sequence (velocity. encoding [V-enc] of 20 cm/s, FOV = 160, 3 mm slice thickness, image matrix size 256 x 256, TR = 53 ms, TE = I I ms, NSA = 2, flip angle = 15 degrees and 23 frames per cardiac cycle with peripheral retrospective pulse gating). Our method was developed using MATLAB R7. Errors introduced by background offset and possible aliased pixels were automatically detected and corrected if necessary in order to calculate the flow parameters that characterize CSF dynamics. The semiautomatic seed method reproducibility was evaluated and compared with the radius method by two observers analysing 21 healthy subjects. Results: The measurements using the semiautomatic seed method reduced the interobservers variability (intra-class correlation [ICC] = 1.0 for stroke volume and for volumetrie flow rate) versus the radius method (ICC = 0.46 for stroke volume and 0.65 for flow rate). Normal stroke volume (39.19 +/- 20.13 mu l/cyele), flow rate (3.81 +/- 2.81 ml/min), maximal mean systolic velocity (5.27 +/- 1.3 cm/s) and maximal mean diastolic velocity (4.20 +/- 1.4 cm/s) were calculated with the half moon and aliasing corrected seed method. Conclusions: Semiautomatic measurements (seed method with half moon background and aliasing correction) allow a generalization of the calculus of flow parameters with great consistency and independency of the operator.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 87
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   PUBS: Pulsatility-based segmentation of lumens conducting non-steady flow [J].
Alperin, N ;
Lee, SH .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2003, 49 (05) :934-944
[2]   Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and relation with blood flow -: A magnetic resonance study with semiautomated cerebrospinal fluid segmentation [J].
Balédent, O ;
Henry-Feugeas, MCC ;
Idy-Peretti, I .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2001, 36 (07) :368-377
[3]   PHASE-CONTRAST CINE MR-IMAGING OF NORMAL AQUEDUCTAL CSF FLOW - EFFECT OF AGING AND RELATION TO CSF VOID ON MODULUS MR [J].
BARKHOF, E ;
KOUWENHOVEN, M ;
SCHELTENS, P ;
SPRENGER, M ;
ALGRA, P ;
VALK, J .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 1994, 35 (02) :123-130
[4]   INTRACLASS CORRELATION COEFFICIENT AS A MEASURE OF RELIABILITY [J].
BARTKO, JJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1966, 19 (01) :3-&
[5]  
BHADELIA RA, 1995, AM J NEURORADIOL, V16, P389
[6]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[7]   Automatic model-based contour detection and blood flow quantification in small vessels with velocity encoded magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Box, FMA ;
Spilt, A ;
Van Buchem, MA ;
van der Geest, RJ ;
Reiber, JHC .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2003, 38 (09) :567-577
[8]   FLOWING CEREBROSPINAL-FLUID IN NORMAL AND HYDROCEPHALIC STATES - APPEARANCE ON MR IMAGES [J].
BRADLEY, WG ;
KORTMAN, KE ;
BURGOYNE, B .
RADIOLOGY, 1986, 159 (03) :611-616
[9]   Normal-pressure hydrocephalus: Evaluation with cerebrospinal fluid flow measurements at MR imaging [J].
Bradley, WG ;
Scalzo, D ;
Queralt, J ;
Nitz, WN ;
Atkinson, DJ ;
Wong, P .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 198 (02) :523-529
[10]  
Bradley William G. Jr., 1992, Magnetic Resonance Quarterly, V8, P169