ICTs usage and skills matching at work: some evidence from Spain

被引:11
作者
Caparros Ruiz, Antonio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaga, Stat & Econometr, Malaga, Spain
关键词
Training; ICTs; Job matching; Ordered models;
D O I
10.1108/IJM-03-2020-0103
中图分类号
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose This article focuses on the Spanish labour market, and its primary objectives are to analyse the factors determining the ICTs usage at workplace, and examine how the workers' e-skills match with the job tasks requiring ICTs. Furthermore, it will explore whether doing ICTs training activities has a positive effect on the probability of carrying out appropriately the ICTs at work. Design/methodology/approach The methodology applied is an ordered response model analysing how the workers' e-skills match with the knowledge required to the ICTs usage at the job. This econometric specification will control by the selection bias generated because not all employees use ICTs to perform the job tasks. Data are obtained from the Survey on Equipment and Use of ICTs in Households (ICTS-H Survey). Findings Educational attainment and the type of ICTs training are the most relevant variables to explain the ICTs usage and the quality of the job match. Research limitations/implications Data used are cross-sectional, and it excludes the possibility of observing how the workers' careers evolve depending on their ICTs training. Practical implications The methodology applied allows the authors to obtain the marginal effects to the variables explaining the probability of using ICTs at job, and how the workers' knowledge match with the e-skill required by the employers. Social implications The results are a source of information to policymakers about how workers face the introduction of ICTs in the labour market. Originality/value To the best of author's knowledge, the article's topic and its methodology are unprecedented in the economic literature and, specially, in the Spanish case.
引用
收藏
页码:1064 / 1083
页数:20
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   GROWTH AND UNEMPLOYMENT [J].
AGHION, P ;
HOWITT, P .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1994, 61 (03) :477-494
[2]   Occupational structure, technological innovation, and reorganization of production [J].
Aguirregabiria, V ;
Alonso-Borrego, C .
LABOUR ECONOMICS, 2001, 8 (01) :43-73
[3]  
Anicic K., 2020, SAGE OPEN, P1, DOI [10.1177/2158244019898733, DOI 10.1177/2158244019898733HTTPS://D0I.0RG/10.1177/21582440198987]
[4]   A knowledge-based approach for representing jobholder profile toward optimal human-machine collaboration in cyber physical production systems [J].
Ansari, Fazel ;
Hold, Philipp ;
Khobreh, Marjan .
CIRP JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 28 :87-106
[5]  
Autor D., 2010, WORKING PAPERS, V16082
[6]   Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation [J].
Autor, David H. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2015, 29 (03) :3-30
[7]   The Growth of Low-Skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the US Labor Market [J].
Autor, David H. ;
Dorn, David .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (05) :1553-1597
[8]   Computing inequality: Have computers changed the labor market? [J].
Autor, DH ;
Katz, LF ;
Krueger, AB .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1998, 113 (04) :1169-1213
[9]   The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration [J].
Autor, DH ;
Levy, F ;
Murnane, RJ .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2003, 118 (04) :1279-1333
[10]   How does information technology affect productivity? Plant level comparisons of product innovation, process improvement, and worker skills [J].
Bartel, Ann ;
Ichniowski, Casey ;
Shaw, Kathryn .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2007, 122 (04) :1721-1758