Inequalities in health care use and expenditures: empirical data from eight developing countries and countries in transition

被引:2
|
作者
Makinen, M
Waters, H
Rauch, M
Almagambetova, N
Bitran, R
Gilson, L
McIntyre, D
Pannarunothai, S
Prieto, AL
Ubilla, G
Ram, S
机构
[1] ABT Associates Inc, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
[2] Free Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Kazakhstan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Alma Ata, Kazakhstan
[5] Bitran Asociados, Santiago, Chile
[6] Univ Witwatersrand, Ctr Hlth Policy, ZA-2050 Wits, South Africa
[7] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Hlth Policy Unit, London WC1, England
[8] Univ Cape Town, Hlth Econ Unit, ZA-7925 Cape Town, South Africa
[9] Naresuan Univ, Ctr Hlth Equ Monitoring, Fac Med, Phitsanulok, Thailand
[10] Dev Associates, Arlington, VA USA
关键词
health expenditures; health policy; health services accessibility; patient acceptance of health care; social justice;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This paper summarizes eight country studies of inequality in the health sector. The analyses use household data to examine the distribution of service use and health expenditures. Each study divides the population into "income" quintiles, estimated using consumption expenditures. The studies measure inequality in the use of and spending on health services. Richer groups are found to have a higher probability of obtaining care when sick, to be more likely to be seen by a doctor, and to have a higher probability of receiving medicines when they are ill, than the poorer groups. The richer also spend more in absolute terms on care. in several instances there are unexpected findings. There is no consistent pattern in the use of private providers. Richer households do not devote a consistently higher percentage of their consumption expenditures to health care. The analyses indicate that intuition concerning inequalities could result in misguided decisions. It would thus be worthwhile to measure inequality to inform policy-making. Additional research could be performed using a com mon methodology for the collection of data and applying more sophisticated analytical techniques. These analyses could be used to measure the impact of health policy changes on inequality.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 65
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [41] Inequalities in health services access and use among formal, informal, and unemployed workers, based on data from the Brazilian National Household Sample Survey, 2008
    Campos Miquilin, Isabella de Oliveira
    Marin-Leon, Leticia
    Monteiro, Maria Ines
    Correa Filho, Heleno Rodrigues
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2013, 29 (07): : 1392 - 1406
  • [42] Would Allowing Privately Funded Health Care Reduce Public Waiting Time? Theory and Empirical Evidence from Canadian Joint Replacement Surgery Data
    Chen, Hong
    Qian, Qu
    Zhang, Anming
    PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2015, 24 (04) : 605 - 618
  • [43] Trends and inequalities in women's use of quality antenatal care, intrapartum care, and immediate postnatal care services in Ethiopia: multivariate decomposition, secondary data analyses of four demographic and health surveys over two decades (2001-2019)
    Negero, Melese Girmaye
    Sibbritt, David
    Dawson, Angela
    BMJ OPEN, 2025, 15 (03):
  • [44] Assessing the outcomes and experiences of care from the perspective of people living with chronic conditions, to support countries in developing people-centred policies and practices: study protocol of the International Survey of People Living with Chronic Conditions (PaRIS survey)
    de Boer, Dolf
    van den Berg, Michael
    Ballester, Marta
    Bloemeke, Janika
    Boerma, Wienke
    de Bienassis, Katherine
    Groenewegen, Peter
    Groene, Oliver
    Kendir, Candan
    Klazinga, Niek
    Porter, Ian
    Sunol, Rosa
    Thomas, Laura
    Valderas, Jose Maria
    Williams, Rachel
    Rijken, Mieke
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (09):