Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) protocol in patients undergoing laparoscopic resection for stage IV colorectal cancer

被引:5
|
作者
Pedziwiatr, Michal [1 ,2 ]
Pisarska, Magdalena [1 ,2 ]
Kisielewski, Michal [1 ,2 ]
Major, Piotr [1 ,2 ]
Matlok, Maciej [1 ,2 ]
Wierdak, Mateusz [1 ,2 ]
Natkaniec, Michal [1 ,2 ]
Budzynski, Andrzej [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ, Coll Med, Dept Gen Surg 2, PL-31501 Krakow, Poland
[2] Jagiellonian Univ, Coll Med, Dept Endoscop Metab & Soft Tissue Tumors Surg, PL-31501 Krakow, Poland
来源
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY | 2015年 / 13卷
关键词
Fast-track surgery; Colorectal cancer; Laparoscopy; Enhanced recovery after surgery; Perioperative care; COLONIC SURGERY; SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS; PALLIATIVE RESECTION; FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY; RECTAL-CANCER; PRIMARY TUMOR; OUTCOMES; CLASSIFICATION; MANAGEMENT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1186/s12957-015-0745-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: There is strong evidence for the use of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol with colorectal surgery. However, in most studies on ERAS, patients with stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) are commonly excluded. It is not certain if the ERAS protocol combined with laparoscopy improves outcomes in this group of patients as well. The aim of the study is to assess the feasibility of the ERAS protocol implementation in patients operated laparoscopically due to stage IV CRC. Methods: A prospective analysis of patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery was performed. Group 1 included patients with stages I-III, and group 2 included patients with stage IV CRC. Demographic, surgical factors, length of stay (LOS), complications, readmissions, ERAS implementation and early postoperative recovery were compared between the groups. Results: Group 1 included 168 patients, and group 2 included 20 patients. There was no difference in the age, sex, BMI, ASA, cancer localisation or surgical parameters. No statistically significant difference was noted in complications (26.8 vs 20 %, p = 0.51344), LOS (4.7 vs 5.7 days, p = 0.28228) or readmissions (6 vs 10 %, p = 0.48392). The ERAS protocol compliance was 86.3 and 83.0 %, respectively (p = 0.17158). Conclusions: Implementation of the ERAS protocol and laparoscopic surgery among patients with stage IV CRC is feasible and provides similar short-term clinical outcomes and recovery as with patients with stages I-III.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Enhanced recovery programme following laparoscopic colorectal resection for elderly patients
    Zeng, Wei Gen
    Liu, Meng Jia
    Zhou, Zhi Xiang
    Wang, Zhen Jun
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 88 (06) : 582 - 586
  • [32] Feasibility, safety and effectiveness of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients undergoing liver resection
    Bhat, Mohamad Younis
    Ali, Sadaf
    Gupta, Sonam
    Ahmad, Younis
    Lattoo, Mohd Riyaz
    Ansari, Mohammad Juned
    Patel, Ajay
    Haq, Mohd Fazl ul
    Parveen, Shaheena
    ANNALS OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SURGERY, 2024, 28 (03) : 344 - 349
  • [33] A model for lymphocyte activation in open versus laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer patients in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols
    Ana Belén Martínez
    J. Longás
    J. M. Ramírez
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2017, 32 : 913 - 916
  • [34] Clinical efficacy of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
    Cao, Jie
    Gu, Jie
    Wang, Yan
    Guo, Xianjuan
    Gao, Xu
    Lu, Xiaoying
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 49 (08)
  • [35] A model for lymphocyte activation in open versus laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer patients in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols
    Belen Martinez, Ana
    Longas, J.
    Ramirez, J. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2017, 32 (06) : 913 - 916
  • [36] Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in patients with advanced ovarian cancer undergoing ultra-radical cytoreductive surgery with intestinal resection and anastomosis: a retrospective study
    Zhang, Qin
    Lei, Cuirong
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 44 (02) : 79 - 85
  • [37] The factors related to failure of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) in colon cancer surgery
    Chen, Jian-Sheng
    Sun, Si-Da
    Wang, Zhi-Sheng
    Cai, Tian-Hong
    Huang, Long-Kai
    Sun, Wen-Xing
    Lin, Chang-Qing
    Zhou, Jun-Feng
    Wang, Jia-Xing
    He, Qing-Liang
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2020, 405 (07) : 1025 - 1030
  • [38] Neurosurgical enhanced recovery after surgery ERAS for geriatric patients undergoing elective craniotomy: A review
    Liu, Bolin
    Liu, Shujuan
    Zheng, Tao
    Lu, Dan
    Chen, Lei
    Ma, Tao
    Wang, Yuan
    Gao, Guodong
    He, Shiming
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (33) : E30043
  • [39] Modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer
    Shida, Dai
    Tagawa, Kyoko
    Inada, Kentaro
    Nasu, Keiichi
    Seyama, Yasuji
    Maeshiro, Tsuyoshi
    Miyamoto, Sachio
    Inoue, Satoru
    Umekita, Nobutaka
    BMC SURGERY, 2017, 17
  • [40] Adaptation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Protocol in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Patients
    Ak, Huelya Yilmaz
    Yildjz, Mustafa
    Yildjz, Ahmet
    Dogan, Sait Mesut
    Salihoglu, Ziya
    Erkalp, Kerem
    Okcun, Emir Ozgur Baris
    Ozsahin, Yasemin
    TURK KARDIYOLOJI DERNEGI ARSIVI-ARCHIVES OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF CARDIOLOGY, 2025, 53 (02): : 127 - 133