Development of a Prognostic Survival Algorithm for Patients with Metastatic Spine Disease

被引:109
作者
Pereira, Nuno Rui Paulino [1 ]
Janssen, Stein J. [1 ]
van Dijk, Eva [1 ]
Harris, Mitchel B. [2 ]
Hornicek, Francis J. [1 ]
Ferrone, Marco L. [2 ]
Schwab, Joseph H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Orthopaed Oncol Serv, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Orthopaed Oncol Serv, Boston, MA USA
关键词
SCORING SYSTEM; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PREDICTION MODEL; TUMOR PROGNOSIS; CORD-INJURY; OF-LIFE; SURGERY; CANCER; INDEX; MORBIDITY;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.15.00975
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Current prognostication models for survival estimation in patients with metastatic spine disease lack accuracy. Identifying new risk factors could improve existing models. We assessed factors associated with survival in patients surgically treated for spine metastases, created a classic scoring algorithm, nomogram, and boosting algorithm, and tested the predictive accuracy of the three created algorithms at estimating survival. Methods: We included 649 patients from two tertiary care referral centers in this retrospective study (2002 to 2014). A multivariate Cox model was used to identify factors independently associated with survival. We created a classic scoring system, a nomogram, and a boosting (i.e., machine learning) algorithm and calculated their accuracy by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: Older age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; p = 0.009), poor performance status (HR, 1.54; p = 0.001), primary cancer type (HR, 1.68; p < 0.001), > 1 spine metastasis (HR, 1.32; p = 0.009), lung and/or liver metastasis (HR, 1.35; p = 0.005), brain metastasis (HR, 1.90; p < 0.001), any systemic therapy for cancer prior to a surgical procedure (e.g., chemotherapy, immunotherapy, hormone therapy) (HR, 1.65; p < 0.001), higher white blood-cell count (HR, 1.03; p = 0.002), and lower hemoglobin levels (HR, 0.92; p = 0.009) were independently associated with decreased survival. The boosting algorithm was best at predicting survival on the training data sets (p < 0.001); the nomogram was more reliable at estimating survival on the test data sets, with an accuracy of 0.75 (30 days), 0.73 (90 days), and 0.75 (365 days). Conclusions: We identified risk factors associated with survival that should be considered in prognostication. Performance of the boosting algorithm and nomogram were comparable on the testing data sets. However, the nomogram is easier to apply and therefore more useful to aid surgical decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:1767 / 1776
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [21] Predictive value of seven preoperative prognostic scoring systems for spinal metastases
    Leithner, Andreas
    Radl, Roman
    Gruber, Gerald
    Hochegger, Markus
    Leithner, Katharina
    Welkerling, Heike
    Rehak, Peter
    Windhager, Reinhard
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 17 (11) : 1488 - 1495
  • [22] Cancer-related inflammation
    Mantovani, Alberto
    Allavena, Paola
    Sica, Antonio
    Balkwill, Frances
    [J]. NATURE, 2008, 454 (7203) : 436 - 444
  • [23] The Evolution of Boosting Algorithms From Machine Learning to Statistical Modelling
    Mayr, A.
    Binder, H.
    Gefeller, O.
    Schmid, M.
    [J]. METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 2014, 53 (06) : 419 - 427
  • [24] Survival in patients operated on for pathologic fracture: Implications for end-of-life orthopedic care
    Nathan, SS
    Healey, JH
    Mellano, D
    Hoang, B
    Lewis, I
    Morris, CD
    Athanasian, EA
    Boland, PJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (25) : 6072 - 6082
  • [25] A Validated Prediction Model for Overall Survival From Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Toward Survival Prediction for Individual Patients
    Oberije, Cary
    De Ruysscher, Dirk
    Houben, Ruud
    van de Heuvel, Michel
    Uyterlinde, Wilma
    Deasy, Joseph O.
    Belderbos, Jose
    Dingemans, Anne-Marie C.
    Rimner, Andreas
    Din, Shaun
    Lambin, Philippe
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 92 (04): : 935 - 944
  • [26] TOXICITY AND RESPONSE CRITERIA OF THE EASTERN-COOPERATIVE-ONCOLOGY-GROUP
    OKEN, MM
    CREECH, RH
    TORMEY, DC
    HORTON, J
    DAVIS, TE
    MCFADDEN, ET
    CARBONE, PP
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1982, 5 (06): : 649 - 655
  • [27] PICCIRILLO JF, 2004, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V26, P2441
  • [28] Updating and Validating the Charlson Comorbidity Index and Score for Risk Adjustment in Hospital Discharge Abstracts Using Data From 6 Countries
    Quan, Hude
    Li, Bing
    Couris, Chantal M.
    Fushimi, Kiyohide
    Graham, Patrick
    Hider, Phil
    Januel, Jean-Marie
    Sundararajan, Vijaya
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 173 (06) : 676 - 682
  • [29] Contemporary Management of Metastatic Bone Disease: Tips and Tools of the Trade for General Practitioners
    Quinn, Robert H.
    Randall, R. Lor
    Benevenia, Joseph
    Berven, Sigurd H.
    Raskin, Kevin A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2013, 95A (20) : 1888 - 1895
  • [30] Boosted regression (boosting): An introductory tutorial and a Stata plugin
    Schonlau, Matthias
    [J]. STATA JOURNAL, 2005, 5 (03) : 330 - 354