Development of a Prognostic Survival Algorithm for Patients with Metastatic Spine Disease

被引:109
作者
Pereira, Nuno Rui Paulino [1 ]
Janssen, Stein J. [1 ]
van Dijk, Eva [1 ]
Harris, Mitchel B. [2 ]
Hornicek, Francis J. [1 ]
Ferrone, Marco L. [2 ]
Schwab, Joseph H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Orthopaed Oncol Serv, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Orthopaed Oncol Serv, Boston, MA USA
关键词
SCORING SYSTEM; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PREDICTION MODEL; TUMOR PROGNOSIS; CORD-INJURY; OF-LIFE; SURGERY; CANCER; INDEX; MORBIDITY;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.15.00975
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Current prognostication models for survival estimation in patients with metastatic spine disease lack accuracy. Identifying new risk factors could improve existing models. We assessed factors associated with survival in patients surgically treated for spine metastases, created a classic scoring algorithm, nomogram, and boosting algorithm, and tested the predictive accuracy of the three created algorithms at estimating survival. Methods: We included 649 patients from two tertiary care referral centers in this retrospective study (2002 to 2014). A multivariate Cox model was used to identify factors independently associated with survival. We created a classic scoring system, a nomogram, and a boosting (i.e., machine learning) algorithm and calculated their accuracy by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: Older age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; p = 0.009), poor performance status (HR, 1.54; p = 0.001), primary cancer type (HR, 1.68; p < 0.001), > 1 spine metastasis (HR, 1.32; p = 0.009), lung and/or liver metastasis (HR, 1.35; p = 0.005), brain metastasis (HR, 1.90; p < 0.001), any systemic therapy for cancer prior to a surgical procedure (e.g., chemotherapy, immunotherapy, hormone therapy) (HR, 1.65; p < 0.001), higher white blood-cell count (HR, 1.03; p = 0.002), and lower hemoglobin levels (HR, 0.92; p = 0.009) were independently associated with decreased survival. The boosting algorithm was best at predicting survival on the training data sets (p < 0.001); the nomogram was more reliable at estimating survival on the test data sets, with an accuracy of 0.75 (30 days), 0.73 (90 days), and 0.75 (365 days). Conclusions: We identified risk factors associated with survival that should be considered in prognostication. Performance of the boosting algorithm and nomogram were comparable on the testing data sets. However, the nomogram is easier to apply and therefore more useful to aid surgical decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:1767 / 1776
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] SURVIVAL AFTER SURGERY FOR SPINAL AND EXTREMITY METASTASES - PROGNOSTICATION IN 241 PATIENTS
    BAUER, HCF
    WEDIN, R
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1995, 66 (02): : 143 - 146
  • [2] A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION
    CHARLSON, ME
    POMPEI, P
    ALES, KL
    MACKENZIE, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05): : 373 - 383
  • [3] Selecting Treatment for Patients With Malignant Epidural Spinal Cord Compression-Does Age Matter? Results From a Randomized Clinical Trial
    Chi, John H.
    Gokaslan, Ziya
    McCormick, Paul
    Tibbs, Phillip A.
    Kryscio, Richard J.
    Patchell, Roy A.
    [J]. SPINE, 2009, 34 (05) : 431 - 435
  • [4] Prediction of Quality of Life and Survival After Surgery for Symptomatic Spinal Metastases: A Multicenter Cohort Study to Determine Suitability for Surgical Treatment
    Choi, David
    Fox, Zoe
    Albert, Todd
    Arts, Mark
    Balabaud, Laurent
    Bunger, Cody
    Buchowski, Jacob M.
    Coppes, Maarten H.
    Depreitere, Bart
    Fehlings, Michael G.
    Harrop, James
    Kawahara, Norio
    Martin-Benlloch, Juan A.
    Massicotte, Eric M.
    Mazel, Christian
    Oner, Fetullah C.
    Peul, Wilco
    Quraishi, Nasir
    Tokuhashi, Yasuaki
    Tomita, Katsuro
    Verlaan, Jorit Jan
    Wang, Michael
    Crockard, H. Alan
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 77 (05) : 698 - 708
  • [5] Single-stage posterior decompression and stabilization for metastasis of the thoracic spine: prognostic factors for functional outcome and patients' survival
    Chong, Sangjoon
    Shin, Sang-Hoon
    Yoo, Heon
    Lee, Seung Hoon
    Kim, Ki-Jeong
    Jahng, Tae-Ahn
    Gwak, Ho-Shin
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 12 (12) : 1083 - 1092
  • [6] Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity
    Coleman, Robert E.
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2006, 12 (20) : 6243S - 6249S
  • [7] Collins GS, 2015, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V350, DOI [10.1111/1471-0528.13244, 10.1136/bmj.g7594]
  • [8] Estimating Survival in Patients with Operable Skeletal Metastases: An Application of a Bayesian Belief Network
    Forsberg, Jonathan Agner
    Eberhardt, John
    Boland, Patrick J.
    Wedin, Rikard
    Healey, John H.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (05):
  • [9] Modeling 1-year survival after surgery on the metastatic spine
    Ghori, Ahmer K.
    Leonard, Dana A.
    Schoenfeld, Andrew J.
    Saadat, Ehsan
    Scott, Nathan
    Ferrone, Marco L.
    Pearson, Adam M.
    Harris, Mitchel B.
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 15 (11) : 2345 - 2350
  • [10] Diet and breast cancer: Evidence that extremes in diet are associated with poor survival
    Goodwin, PJ
    Ennis, M
    Pritchard, KI
    Koo, J
    Trudeau, ME
    Hood, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (13) : 2500 - 2507