The natural capital indicator framework (NCIF) for improved national natural capital reporting

被引:24
作者
Fairbrass, A. [1 ,2 ]
Mace, G. [2 ]
Ekins, P. [1 ]
Milligan, B. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Inst Sustainable Resources, London, England
[2] UCL, Ctr Biodivers & Environm Res, London, England
[3] Univ New South Wales, Fac Law, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES); Ecosystem services; Environmental assets; Natural capital accounts; Sustainable development; System of Environmental Economic Accounting (SEEA); ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; BIODIVERSITY; PROGRESS; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101198
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
It is now widely recognised that components of the environment play the role of economic assets, termed natural capital, that are a foundation of social and economic development. National governments monitor the state and trends of natural capital through a range of activities including natural capital accounting, national ecosystem assessments, ecosystem service valuation, and economic and environmental analyses. Indicators play an integral role in these activities as they facilitate the reporting of complex natural capital information. One factor that hinders the success of these activities and their comparability across countries is the absence of a coherent framework of indicators concerning natural capital (and its benefits) that can aid decision-making. Here we present an integrated Natural Capital Indicator Framework (NCIF) alongside example indicators, which provides an illustrative structure for countries to select and organise indicators to assess their use of, and dependence on, natural capital. The NCIF sits within a wider context of indicators related to natural, human, social and manufactured capital, and associated flows of benefits. The framework provides decision-makers with a structured approach to selecting natural capital indicators with which to make decisions about economic development that take into account national natural capital and associated flows of benefits.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2022, GREEN GROWTH ACTION
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, System of Environmental Economic Accounting 2012-Central Framework
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Towards Green Growth, DOI [10.1787/5k4bxkt1cjd2-en, DOI 10.1787/5K4BXKT1CJD2-EN, DOI 10.1787/9789264111318-EN, DOI 10.1787/A9-ACEE6-EN]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Technical Report
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Inclusive Green Growth: The Pathway to Sustainable Development
[6]   The natural capital framework for sustainably efficient and equitable decision making [J].
Bateman, Ian J. ;
Mace, Georgina M. .
NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 3 (10) :776-783
[7]  
Bogaart P., 2019, DISCUSSION PAPER 1 1
[9]  
Bordt Michael, 2019, One Ecosystem, V4, DOI 10.3897/oneeco.4.e31420
[10]   Measuring natural capital: towards accounts for the UK and a basis for improved decision-making [J].
Bright, Geoff ;
Connors, Emily ;
Grice, Joe .
OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, 2019, 35 (01) :88-108