Calcineurin inhibitors versus cyclophosphamide for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 clinical trials

被引:41
|
作者
Qiu, Ting Ting [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Chao [1 ]
Zhao, Hong Wei [1 ]
Zhou, Jun Wen [3 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Dept Pharm, Hosp 3, 49 Huayuan North Rd, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] China Pharmaceut Univ, Sch Basic Med & Clin Pharm, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] AixMarseille Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Marseille, France
关键词
Meta-analysis; Calcineurin inhibitors; Cyclophosphamide; Idiopathic membranous nephropathy; CORTICOSTEROIDS; GLOMERULOPATHY; CYCLOSPORINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.autrev.2016.12.005
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) with cyclophosphamide (CTX) in the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN). Methods: A literature search was carried out using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and three Chinese databases (WanFang Data, Chongqing VIP and China National Knowledge Infrastructure) from inception through June 2016. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of CNIs with CTX in IMN patients were included. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the quality of each study. Statistical analyses were performed using Revman 5.3 software. Odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous data and mean difference (MD) for continuous data with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and data were pooled with a random-effect model. Results: A total of twenty-one studies involving 1187 patients were included in this study. CNIs had significant merits in increasing total remission (CSA vs CTX: OR 1.91, 95%CI 1.09 to 334, P = 0.02; TAC vs CTX: OR 2.95, 95%CI 1.84 to 4.75, P < 0.00001), elevating serum albumin (CSA vs CTX: MD 3.83, 95%CI 2.49 to 5.16, P < 0.00001; TAC vs CTX: OR 8.57, 95%CI 5.08 to 12.07, P < 0.00001) and reducing proteinuria (CSA vs CTX: MD -0.73, 95%Cl -1.25 to -0.22, P = 0.005; TAC vs CTX: MD - 1.7, 95%Cl - 2.29 to - 1.10, P< 0.00001) compared with CTX after 6 months of treatment. However, no similar results were found after 12 months. Moreover, CSA had a higher relapse rate than CTX (OR 3.89, 95%Cl 1.53 to 9.92, P = 0.004), which was not found in the comparison of TAC and CTX. The incidences of leukopenia, alopecia and liver damage were higher in the (TX group (OR (95%CI): 023 (0.09 to 0.59), 0.10 (0.04 to 0.24), and 036 (0.19 to 0.69, respectively), whereas the incidences of hirsutism, gingival hyperplasia, worsening hypertension and hyperuricemia were higher in the CSA group (OR (95%CI): 8.64 (1.97 to 37.79, 4.44 (1.09 to 17.99), 4.59 (1.43 to 14.82) and 9.05 (1.53 to 5336), respectively). Conclusions: Our systematic review demonstrates that CNIs are promising alternatives to CTX for IMN patients, primarily due to their better short-term efficacy and safety. Well-designed clinical trials are needed to further evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of CNIs and CTX. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 145
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of cyclophosphamide and calcineurin inhibitors for idiopathic membranous nephropathy A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Kang
    Yu, Yanqiu
    Gao, Yuan
    Gao, Junjie
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (08) : 28891
  • [2] Tacrolimus versus cyclophosphamide for patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy and treated with steroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Huang, Haiting
    Liang, Zhao
    Zheng, Xintong
    Qing, Qin
    Du, Xiuri
    Tang, Zhiming
    Wei, Meili
    Wang, Chen
    Zhong, Qiuhong
    Lin, Xu
    RENAL FAILURE, 2021, 43 (01) : 840 - 850
  • [3] Immunosuppression for Membranous Nephropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 36 Clinical Trials
    Chen, Yizhi
    Schieppati, Arrigo
    Cai, Guangyan
    Chen, Xiangmei
    Zamora, Javier
    Giuliano, Giovanni A.
    Braun, Norbert
    Perna, Annalisa
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2013, 8 (05): : 787 - 796
  • [4] Efficacy and safety of glucocorticoid combined with cyclophosphamide therapy on membranous nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Feng, Chengcheng
    Chen, Xuexun
    Wang, Xiangming
    Guo, Min
    Guo, Zhentao
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [5] A comparison of cyclophosphamide versus tacrolimus in terms of treatment effect for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A meta-analysis
    Li, Yan-Chun
    Huang, Jing
    Li, Xin
    Zhao, Su-Mei
    NEFROLOGIA, 2019, 39 (03): : 269 - 276
  • [6] Traditional Chinese medicine for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shan, Wenjun
    Guan, Haiyu
    Gu, Haowen
    Wang, Rongrong
    Huang, Xiaoyan
    Li, Ping
    Xie, Ying
    Bao, Kun
    Qin, Xindong
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (07)
  • [7] Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus combined with corticosteroids in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Tian, Zhonghua
    Li, Yuxia
    Xie, Yehong
    Yang, Yalin
    Xu, Jiangyan
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2022, 54 (10) : 2555 - 2566
  • [8] Rituximab for the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy with nephrotic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    You, Lu
    Ye, Peiyi
    Xiao, Guanqing
    Liang, Jiabao
    Kong, Yaozhong
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 51 (06) : 2870 - 2880
  • [9] Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus monotherapy versus cyclophosphamide-corticosteroid combination therapy for idiopathic membranous nephropathy A meta-analysis
    Gong, Lifeng
    Xu, Min
    Xu, Wei
    Tang, Weigang
    Lu, Jingkui
    Jiang, Wei
    Xie, Fengyan
    Ding, Liping
    Qian, Xiaoli
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (28) : E26628
  • [10] Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus vs cyclophosphamide in the therapy of patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a meta-analysis
    Lin, Wenshan
    Li, Hong-Yan
    Lin, Shujun
    Zhou, Tianbiao
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2019, 13 : 2179 - 2186