Use of Quality Indicators in Nursing Homes in Victoria, Australia: A Cross-Sectional Descriptive Survey

被引:10
作者
Ibrahim, Joseph E. [1 ]
Chadwick, Liam [2 ]
MacPhail, Aleece [3 ]
McAuliffe, Linda [4 ]
Koch, Susan [5 ]
Wells, Yvonne [4 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[2] Natl Univ Ireland, Galway, Ireland
[3] Ballarat Hlth Serv, Ballarat, Vic, Australia
[4] La Trobe Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] RDNS Res Inst, St Kilda, Vic, Australia
关键词
quality indicators; data use; improving care; residential aged care; nursing homes; HEALTH-CARE; AGED CARE; CLINICAL INDICATORS; OF-CARE; PERFORMANCE; IMPROVEMENT; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1177/0898264314531619
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学]; R592 [老年病学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100203 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to characterize the use of mandated quality indicators (QIs) in public sector nursing homes by describing their adherence to established principles of measurement and whether nursing homes respond to QI data to improve care. Method: Data were collected from a descriptive cross-sectional quantitative study using a confidential survey questionnaire distributed electronically to senior staff in all public sector nursing homes in Victoria, Australia. Results: Staff from 113 of 196 facilities completed the survey (58%). Adherence to principles of measurement was suboptimal, with variation in applying QI definitions and infrequent random audits of data (n = 54, 48%). QI data triggered reviews of individual residents 62%-79%), staff practice (44%-65%), and systems of care (45%-55%). Most facilities (58%-75%) reported that beneficial changes in care occurred as a result of using QIs. Discussion: QI performance data are positively received and used to improve care. Standardization of data collection, analysis, and reporting should strengthen the program's utility.
引用
收藏
页码:824 / 840
页数:17
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
*ACC EC, 2010, FUT AG CAR AUSTR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, GUARDIAN 0319
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, WORLD MED ASS DECL H
[4]  
Australian Productivity Commission, 2011, PROD COMM INQ REP SE, pxcii
[5]   Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research [J].
Baruch, Yehuda ;
Holtom, Brooks C. .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 2008, 61 (08) :1139-1160
[6]   Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases - Implications for pay for performance [J].
Boyd, CM ;
Darer, J ;
Boult, C ;
Fried, LP ;
Boult, L ;
Wu, AW .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (06) :716-724
[7]   Data feedback efforts in quality improvement: lessons learned from US hospitals [J].
Bradley, EH ;
Holmboe, ES ;
Mattera, JA ;
Roumanis, SA ;
Radford, MJ ;
Krumholz, HM .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2004, 13 (01) :26-31
[8]   Aged care in Australia: past, present and future [J].
Bruen, Warwick .
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2005, 24 (03) :130-133
[9]   What Is Nursing Home Quality and How Is It Measured? [J].
Castle, Nicholas G. ;
Ferguson, Jamie C. .
GERONTOLOGIST, 2010, 50 (04) :426-442
[10]   Benchmarking clinical indicators of quality for Australian residential aged care facilities [J].
Courtney, Mary ;
O'Reilly, Maria T. ;
Edwards, Helen ;
Hassall, Stacey .
AUSTRALIAN HEALTH REVIEW, 2010, 34 (01) :93-100