When decarbonization meets development: The sectoral feasibility of greenhouse gas mitigation in India

被引:29
作者
Busby, Joshua W. [1 ]
Shidore, Sarang [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Sch Publ Affairs, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
Climate change; Sectoral; India; Mitigation; Political feasibility; RENEWABLE ENERGY; SOCIAL-SCIENCE; POLITICS; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2016.11.011
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the run-up to the 2015 Paris climate talks, the Indian government announced ambitious climate mitigation goals as part of its INDC (Intended Nationally Determined Contributions). Whether India can meet these targets is a critical question with implications for the success of the Paris climate agreement. We assess India's potential for emissions mitigation through a sectoral lens, focusing on eight dominant sectors - namely electricity production, agriculture, road transport, buildings, and four disaggregated industry subsectors (steel, cement, petrochemicals, and fertilizers). We argue that whether emissions mitigation is favorable from a structural perspective is a function of two main factors: (1) political/organizational feasibility and (2) techno-economic feasibility. Political/organizational feasibility in turn is assessed through two additional factors, market concentration and government concentration. Our central intuition is that fragmented markets and/or fragmented government structures pose barriers for collective action. Road transport represents the most favorable sector for emissions mitigation followed by petrochemicals. Cement and fertilizers are already at or near the global efficiency frontier. Three sectors - electricity, agriculture, and steel - represent hard cases on both dimensions of feasibility. Buildings possess strong techno-economic feasibility but challenging political/organizational feasibility. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 73
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Rethinking the governance of energy infrastructure: Scale, decentralization and polycentrism [J].
Goldthau, Andreas .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2014, 1 :134-140
[22]  
Government of India, 2015, IND INT NAT DET CONT
[23]  
Green JessicaF., 2013, Rethinking Private Authority: Agents and Entrepreneurs in Global Environmental Governance, DOI DOI 10.23943/PRINCETON/9780691157580.001.0001
[24]  
Gupta R, 2012, INDIA TAKING GREEN G
[25]  
Hyvonen M., 2012, RESERVE BANK AUS MAR, P29
[26]  
Justnes H., 2007, ENV SOUND MANAGEMENT
[27]  
Kale S, 2012, ELECT INDIA REGIONAL
[28]   Social Movements and Market Transformations: Lessons From HIV/AIDS and Climate Change [J].
Kapstein, Ethan B. ;
Busby, Joshua William .
INTERNATIONAL STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2016, 60 (02) :317-329
[29]   The rational design of international institutions [J].
Koremenos, B ;
Lipson, C ;
Snidal, D .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2001, 55 (04) :761-+
[30]   Governing for sustainable energy system change: Politics, contexts and contingency [J].
Kuzemko, Caroline ;
Lockwood, Matthew ;
Mitchell, Catherine ;
Hoggett, Richard .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2016, 12 :96-105