Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis and Degenerative Spondylosis: 5-year Results

被引:39
|
作者
Park, Yung [1 ]
Ha, Joong Won [1 ]
Lee, Yun Tae [1 ]
Sung, Na Young [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Natl Hlth Insurance Serv, Dept Orthoped Surg,Ilsan Hosp, Goyang City 410719, Gyeonggi Provin, South Korea
关键词
SPINAL STENOSIS; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; LONG-TERM; COMPLICATIONS; MINIMUM;
D O I
10.1007/s11999-013-3241-y
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Multiple studies have reported favorable short-term results after treatment of spondylolisthesis and other degenerative lumbar diseases with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. However, to our knowledge, results at a minimum of 5 years have not been reported. We determined (1) changes to the Oswestry Disability Index, (2) frequency of radiographic fusion, (3) complications and reoperations, and (4) the learning curve associated with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at minimum 5-year followup. We reviewed our first 124 patients who underwent minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion to treat low-grade spondylolisthesis and degenerative lumbar diseases and did not need a major deformity correction. This represented 63% (124 of 198) of the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures we performed for those indications during the study period (2003-2007). Eighty-three (67%) patients had complete 5-year followup. Plain radiographs and CT scans were evaluated by two reviewers. Trends of surgical time, blood loss, and hospital stay over time were examined by logarithmic curve fit-regression analysis to evaluate the learning curve. At 5 years, mean Oswestry Disability Index improved from 60 points preoperatively to 24 points and 79 of 83 patients (95%) had improvement of greater than 10 points. At 5 years, 67 of 83 (81%) achieved radiographic fusion, including 64 of 72 patients (89%) who had single-level surgery. Perioperative complications occurred in 11 of 124 patients (9%), and another surgical procedure was performed in eight of 124 patients (6.5%) involving the index level and seven of 124 patients (5.6%) at adjacent levels. There were slowly decreasing trends of surgical time and hospital stay only in single-level surgery and almost no change in intraoperative blood loss over time, suggesting a challenging learning curve. Oswestry Disability Index scores improved for patients with spondylolisthesis and degenerative lumbar diseases treated with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at minimum 5-year followup. We suggest this procedure is reasonable for properly selected patients with these indications; however, traditional approaches should still be performed for patients with high-grade spondylolisthesis, patients with a severely collapsed disc space and no motion seen on the dynamic radiographs, patients who need multilevel decompression and arthrodesis, and patients with kyphoscoliosis needing correction. Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:1813 / 1823
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Unilateral Fixation for Degenerative Lumbar Disease
    Wang, Hui-wang
    Hu, Yong-cheng
    Wu, Zhan-yong
    Wu, Hua-rong
    Wu, Chun-fu
    Zhang, Lian-suo
    Xu, Wei-kun
    Fan, Hui-long
    Cai, Jin-sheng
    Ma, Jian-qing
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2017, 9 (03) : 277 - 283
  • [22] Comparison between Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MISTLIF) for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Chandra, Vemula V. R.
    Prasad, Bodapati C. M.
    Hanu, Tammireddy G.
    Kale, Pavan G.
    NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2022, 70 (01) : 127 - 134
  • [23] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Ahn, Junyoung
    Tabaraee, Ehsan
    Singh, Kern
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2015, 28 (06): : 222 - 225
  • [24] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Hoffmann, Christoph-Heinrich
    Kandziora, Frank
    OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2020, 32 (03): : 180 - 191
  • [25] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumber interbody fusion and degenerative lumbar spine disease
    Tsahtsarlis, Antonio
    Wood, Martin
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 21 (11) : 2300 - 2305
  • [26] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumber interbody fusion and degenerative lumbar spine disease
    Antonio Tsahtsarlis
    Martin Wood
    European Spine Journal, 2012, 21 : 2300 - 2305
  • [27] Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique Note and Comparison of Early Outcomes with Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Zhang, Hao
    Zhou, Chuanli
    Wang, Chao
    Zhu, Kai
    Tu, Qihao
    Kong, Meng
    Zhao, Chong
    Ma, Xuexiao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2021, 14 : 549 - 558
  • [28] Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Cui, Guan-yu
    Han, Xiao-guang
    Wei, Yi
    Liu, Ya-jun
    He, Da
    Sun, Yu-qing
    Liu, Bo
    Tian, Wei
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2021, 13 (07) : 1960 - 1968
  • [29] Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Disk Disease and Spondylolisthesis Grade I Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery
    Brodano, Giovanni B.
    Martikos, Konstantinos
    Lolli, Francesco
    Gasbarrini, Alessandro
    Cioni, Alfredo
    Bandiera, Stefano
    Di Silvestre, Mario
    Boriani, Stefano
    Greggi, Tiziana
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2015, 28 (10): : E559 - E564
  • [30] Minimally invasive unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of spinal stenosis and modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Chen, Kevin S.
    Than, Khoi D.
    LaMarca, Frank
    Park, Paul
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2013, 35