Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis and Degenerative Spondylosis: 5-year Results

被引:39
|
作者
Park, Yung [1 ]
Ha, Joong Won [1 ]
Lee, Yun Tae [1 ]
Sung, Na Young [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Natl Hlth Insurance Serv, Dept Orthoped Surg,Ilsan Hosp, Goyang City 410719, Gyeonggi Provin, South Korea
关键词
SPINAL STENOSIS; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; LONG-TERM; COMPLICATIONS; MINIMUM;
D O I
10.1007/s11999-013-3241-y
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Multiple studies have reported favorable short-term results after treatment of spondylolisthesis and other degenerative lumbar diseases with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. However, to our knowledge, results at a minimum of 5 years have not been reported. We determined (1) changes to the Oswestry Disability Index, (2) frequency of radiographic fusion, (3) complications and reoperations, and (4) the learning curve associated with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at minimum 5-year followup. We reviewed our first 124 patients who underwent minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion to treat low-grade spondylolisthesis and degenerative lumbar diseases and did not need a major deformity correction. This represented 63% (124 of 198) of the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures we performed for those indications during the study period (2003-2007). Eighty-three (67%) patients had complete 5-year followup. Plain radiographs and CT scans were evaluated by two reviewers. Trends of surgical time, blood loss, and hospital stay over time were examined by logarithmic curve fit-regression analysis to evaluate the learning curve. At 5 years, mean Oswestry Disability Index improved from 60 points preoperatively to 24 points and 79 of 83 patients (95%) had improvement of greater than 10 points. At 5 years, 67 of 83 (81%) achieved radiographic fusion, including 64 of 72 patients (89%) who had single-level surgery. Perioperative complications occurred in 11 of 124 patients (9%), and another surgical procedure was performed in eight of 124 patients (6.5%) involving the index level and seven of 124 patients (5.6%) at adjacent levels. There were slowly decreasing trends of surgical time and hospital stay only in single-level surgery and almost no change in intraoperative blood loss over time, suggesting a challenging learning curve. Oswestry Disability Index scores improved for patients with spondylolisthesis and degenerative lumbar diseases treated with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at minimum 5-year followup. We suggest this procedure is reasonable for properly selected patients with these indications; however, traditional approaches should still be performed for patients with high-grade spondylolisthesis, patients with a severely collapsed disc space and no motion seen on the dynamic radiographs, patients who need multilevel decompression and arthrodesis, and patients with kyphoscoliosis needing correction. Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:1813 / 1823
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and midline lumbar interbody fusion in patients with spondylolisthesis
    Wang, Yang-Yi
    Chung, Yu-Hsuan
    Huang, Chun-Hsien
    Hu, Ming-Hsien
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [12] Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Low-Grade Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Bovonratwet, Patawut
    Samuel, Andre M.
    Mok, Jung Kee
    Vaishnav, Avani S.
    Morse, Kyle W.
    Song, Junho
    Steinhaus, Michael E.
    Jordan, Yusef J.
    Gang, Catherine H.
    Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
    SPINE, 2022, 47 (21) : 1505 - 1514
  • [13] Microendoscopy-Assisted Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: 5-Year Outcomes
    Yang, Yang
    Liu, Zhong-Yu
    Zhang, Liang-Ming
    Pang, Mao
    Chhantyal, Kishor
    Wu, Wen-Bin
    Chen, Zi-Hao
    Luo, Chun-Xiao
    Rong, Li-Min
    Liu, Bin
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 116 : E602 - E610
  • [14] Surgical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Spondylolisthesis and Degenerative Segmental Instability
    Park, Yung
    Ha, Joong Won
    Lee, Yun Tae
    Oh, Hyun Chul
    Yoo, Ju Hyung
    Kim, Hyung Bok
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 5 (04) : 228 - 236
  • [15] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Diseases
    Fan Shunwu
    Zhao Xing
    Zhao Fengdong
    Fang Xiangqian
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (17) : 1615 - 1620
  • [16] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Quante, M.
    Kesten, H.
    Richter, A.
    Halm, H.
    ORTHOPADE, 2012, 41 (02): : 153 - +
  • [17] MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION IN DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR SPINE DISEASE
    Gupta, Pankaj
    Sharma, Arvind
    Singh, Jitendra
    Deen, Shameer
    Tanwar, Akansha
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (105): : 17055 - 17057
  • [18] Minimally Invasive Decompression With Noninstrumented Facet Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Stenosis Associated With Grade 1 Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Kim, Daniel C.
    Laskay, Nicholas
    Alcala, Christopher
    Schwender, James
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2023, 36 (10): : E416 - E422
  • [19] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis in patients with significant obesity
    Lau, Darryl
    Ziewacz, John
    Park, Paul
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 20 (01) : 80 - 83
  • [20] Application and thinking of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar diseases
    Gu, Shao
    Li, Haifeng
    Wang, Daxing
    Dai, Xuejun
    Liu, Chengwei
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (06)