Review of indicators for sustainable energy development

被引:111
作者
Gunnarsdottir, I. [1 ]
Davidsdottir, B. [1 ]
Worrell, E. [2 ]
Sigurgeirsdottir, S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iceland, Environm & Nat Resources, Saemundargotu 2, IS-101 Reykjavik, Iceland
[2] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Princetonlaan 8a, NL-3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Iceland, Fac Polit Sci, Saemundargotu, IS-101 Reykjavik, Iceland
关键词
Sustainable energy development; Sustainability indicators; Energy indicators; Indicator development; Literature review; Energy policy; RENEWABLE ENERGY; MULTIDIMENSIONAL INDICATOR; SECURITY PERFORMANCE; POLICY; INDEX; BRAZIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2020.110294
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sustainable energy development has become an international policy objective and an integral part of sustainable development. It is necessary to develop a robust and comprehensive set of indicators to monitor progress towards sustainable energy development. This analysis aimed to assess established indicator sets for sustainable energy development. The characteristics of a comprehensive and robust indicator set were identified to enable such an assessment and used as a basis for six assessment criteria; transparency of indicator selection and indicator application, conceptual framework, representative, linkages, and stakeholder engagement. A total of 57 indicator sets were found that monitor progress towards sustainable energy development or some aspects of it. All but one of these indicator sets were found to be lacking in some aspect, especially regarding a lack of transparency and consideration of linkages between indicators, presentation of an imbalanced picture, and no involvement of stakeholders during indicator development. The only indicator set that met all criteria were Energy Indicators for Sustainable Development developed jointly by multiple international agencies. Nonetheless, several flaws in this set were identified. The Energy Indicators for Sustainable Development could be considered as an initial basket of indicators for further refinement in the context where they will be applied to ensure their policy relevance and usefulness. The refinement process would benefit from more stakeholder input to take into account the specific context and make sure that there is a balance in the representation of the three dimensions of sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 120 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, World Energy Assessment: Energy and the Challenge ofSustainability
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, The Kyoto Protocol
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, IND SUST DEV GUID ME
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1992, AG 21
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, PURS SUST 2010 ASS C
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2018, MECHANICS, DOI [DOI 10.5755/J01.EE.24.5.4526, DOI 10.5755/J01.MECH.4.24.20721]
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2005, EN IND SUST DEV GUID
[8]  
[Anonymous], RISE-Regulatory Indicators for Sustainable Energy, P82
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2010, EN SEC THAIL
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. Methodology, V3