Evaluation of two doses of etoricoxib, a COX-2 selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), in the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis in a double-blind, randomized controlled trial

被引:13
作者
Bickham, Kara [1 ]
Kivitz, Alan J. [2 ]
Mehta, Anish [1 ]
Frontera, Nancy [1 ]
Shah, Sandhya [1 ]
Stryszak, Paul [1 ]
Popmihajlov, Zoran [1 ]
Peloso, Paul M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Merck & Co Inc, Kenilworth, NJ 07033 USA
[2] Altoona Ctr Clin Res, Duncansville, PA USA
关键词
CLINICAL-TRIAL; PAIN; IMPACT; METAANALYSIS; PREVALENCE; INHIBITORS; SCORE;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-016-1170-0
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) is a common component of treatment regimens for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Etoricoxib is a COX-2 selective NSAID that has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of RA at a dose of 90 mg. The current study further evaluated the efficacy of etoricoxib 60 mg and 90 mg in RA patients with active disease. Methods: This was a 2-part, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in RA (NCT01208181). Patients were required to have a diagnosis of RA (according to ARA 1987 revised classification criteria) and were to demonstrate symptom flare upon discontinuation of previous NSAID treatment prior to randomization. Part I was a 6-week, placebo-controlled period to assess the efficacy of etoricoxib 90 mg and etoricoxib 60 mg, each compared to placebo, as well as to each other. Part II was a 6-week period to evaluate the potential benefit of dose escalation from etoricoxib 60 mg to etoricoxib 90 mg after 6 weeks exposure to etoricoxib 60 mg in Part I compared to maintaining a steady dose of etoricoxib 60 mg throughout Parts I and II. Primary endpoints were Disease Activity Score evaluating 28 joints and C reactive protein level (DAS28-CRP) index and Patient Global Assessment of Pain (Pain) score (0-100 mm VAS) after 6 weeks of treatment in Part I. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study. Results: In total, 1404 patients were randomized in a 2: 7: 7: 8 ratio; 1228 patients completed Part I and 713 patients continued to Part II. Both etoricoxib doses were superior to placebo on both primary efficacy endpoints (p = 0.004 for 60 mg and p = 0.034 for 90 mg for DAS28-CRP; p < 0.001 for both doses for PGAP) in Part I. Further in Part I, etoricoxib 90 mg was not significantly different from 60 mg for DAS28-CRP, but did demonstrate a small, but statistically significant decrease in baseline PGAP score vs. 60 mg (p = 0.019). In Part II, there was no significant decrease in PGAP score after increasing to 90 mg in subjects with inadequate pain relief on 60 mg as compared to subjects who stayed on 60 mg. The incidence of AEs and SAEs were similar between etoricoxib 60 mg and 90 mg in both Part I and II. Conclusion: Both etoricoxib 90 mg and 60 mg are superior to placebo in relieving the symptoms of RA. Etoricoxib 90 mg vs 60 mg resulted in a statistically significant, though small, improvement in PGAP score, but not DAS28-CRP. Dose escalation from 60 mg to 90 mg in pain inadequate responders did not significantly improve efficacy. These results confirm the efficacy and tolerability of etoricoxib 90mg in patients with RA. In addition, this study demonstrated that etoricoxib 60 mg is also efficacious and well-tolerated in RA.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] CLINICAL ASPECTS OF RENAL PROSTAGLANDINS AND NSAID THERAPY
    BRATER, DC
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1988, 17 (03) : 17 - 22
  • [2] Survey of chronic pain in Europe: Prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment
    Breivik, H
    Collett, B
    Ventafridda, V
    Cohen, R
    Gallacher, D
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2006, 10 (04) : 287 - 333
  • [3] Cardiovascular safety and gastrointestinal tolerability of etoricoxib vs diclofenac in a randomized controlled clinical trial (The MEDAL study)
    Combe, Bernard
    Swergold, Gary
    McLay, James
    McCarthy, Timothy
    Zerbini, Cristiano
    Emery, Paul
    Connors, Laurine
    Kaur, Amarjot
    Curtis, Sean
    Laine, Loren
    Cannon, Christopher P.
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY, 2009, 48 (04) : 425 - 432
  • [4] Research design considerations for single-dose analgesic clinical trials in acute pain: IMMPACT recommendations
    Cooper, Stephen A.
    Desjardins, Paul J.
    Turk, Dennis C.
    Dworkin, Robert H.
    Katz, Nathaniel P.
    Kehlet, Henrik
    Ballantyne, Jane C.
    Burke, Laurie B.
    Carragee, Eugene
    Cowan, Penney
    Croll, Scott
    Dionne, Raymond A.
    Farrar, John T.
    Gilron, Ian
    Gordon, Debra B.
    Iyengar, Smriti
    Jay, Gary W.
    Kalso, Eija A.
    Kerns, Robert D.
    McDermott, Michael P.
    Raja, Srinivasa N.
    Rappaport, Bob A.
    Rauschkolb, Christine
    Royal, Mike A.
    Segerdahl, Marta
    Stauffer, Joseph W.
    Todd, Knox H.
    Vanhove, Geertrui F.
    Wallace, Mark S.
    West, Christine
    White, Richard E.
    Wu, Christopher
    [J]. PAIN, 2016, 157 (02) : 288 - 301
  • [5] Cooper SA, 2010, METHODS MOL BIOL, V617, P175, DOI 10.1007/978-1-60327-323-7_15
  • [6] Determining the Minimally Important Difference in the Clinical Disease Activity Index for Improvement and Worsening in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients
    Curtis, J. R.
    Yang, S.
    Chen, L.
    Pope, J. E.
    Keystone, E. C.
    Haraoui, B.
    Boire, G.
    Thorne, J. C.
    Tin, D.
    Hitchon, C. A.
    Bingham, C. O.
    Bykerk, V. P.
    [J]. ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2015, 67 (10) : 1345 - 1353
  • [7] The Disease Activity Score and the EULAR Response Criteria
    Fransen, Jaap
    van Riel, Piet L. C. M.
    [J]. RHEUMATIC DISEASE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2009, 35 (04) : 745 - +
  • [8] Finalisation and validation of the rheumatoid arthritis impact of disease score, a patient-derived composite measure of impact of rheumatoid arthritis: a EULAR initiative
    Gossec, L.
    Paternotte, S.
    Aanerud, G. J.
    Balanescu, A.
    Boumpas, D. T.
    Carmona, L.
    de Wit, M.
    Dijkmans, B. A. C.
    Dougados, M.
    Englbrecht, M.
    Gogus, F.
    Heiberg, T.
    Hernandez, C.
    Kirwan, J. R.
    Mola, E. Martin
    Cerinic, M. Matucci
    Otsa, K.
    Schett, G.
    Scholte-Voshaar, M.
    Sokka, T.
    von Krause, G.
    Wells, G. A.
    Kvien, T. K.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2011, 70 (06) : 935 - 942
  • [9] Further assessment of the clinically effective dose range of etoricoxib: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial in rheumatoid arthritis
    Greenwald, M.
    Peloso, P. M.
    Mandel, D.
    Soto, O.
    Mehta, A.
    Frontera, N.
    Boice, J. A.
    Zhan, X. J.
    Curtis, S. P.
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2011, 27 (10) : 2033 - 2042
  • [10] Preferences for improved health examined in 1,024 patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Pain has highest priority
    Heiberg, T
    Kvien, TK
    [J]. ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2002, 47 (04): : 391 - 397