Measuring bird damage to three fruit crops: A comparison of grower and field estimates

被引:14
|
作者
Elser, J. L. [1 ]
Lindell, C. A. [2 ]
Steensma, K. M. M. [3 ]
Curtis, P. D. [4 ]
Leigh, D. K. [5 ]
Siemer, W. F. [4 ]
Boulanger, J. R. [6 ]
Shwiff, S. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA, APHIS, WS Natl Wildlife Res Ctr, 4101 Laporte Ave, Ft Collins, CO 80521 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, 1405 S Harrison Rd, E Lansing, MI 48823 USA
[3] Trinity Western Univ, 7600 Glover Rd, Langley, BC V2Y 1Y1, Canada
[4] Cornell Univ, 226 Mann Dr, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[5] Western Washington Univ, 516 E Coll Way, Bellingham, WA 98225 USA
[6] Univ North Dakota, 10 Cornell St, Grand Forks, ND 58202 USA
基金
美国农业部;
关键词
Bird damage; Sweet cherries; 'Honeycrisp' apples; Wine grapes; Damage estimates; ABUNDANCES; BENEFITS; IMPACTS; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.cropro.2019.05.010
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Birds are common pests in fruit orchards. They frequently consume and damage fruit resulting in decreased yields for growers. The true extent of damage is difficult to measure. Producer surveys are often implemented to estimate damage, but the accuracy of these estimates is uncertain. We compared damage estimates obtained through field studies with estimates from a producer survey for three fruit crops: wine grapes, sweet cherries, and 'Honeycrisp' apples. We also analyzed relationships between use of various damage management methods and levels of bird damage. We found wine grape and sweet cherry growers accurately assessed bird damage, while 'Honeycrisp' apple growers may overestimate damage. Growing region appears to be an important damage predictor for wine grape and sweet cherry crops. Significant relationships between management methods and damage were positive, suggesting growers only use these methods when bird damage is substantial.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 4
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [11] A Comparison of Fruit and Vegetable Intake Estimates from Three Survey Question Sets to Estimates from 24-Hour Dietary Recall Interviews
    Eaton, Danice K.
    Olsen, Emily O'Malley
    Brener, Nancy D.
    Scanlon, Kelley S.
    Kim, Sonia A.
    Demissie, Zewditu
    Yaroch, Amy Lazarus
    JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2013, 113 (09) : 1165 - 1174
  • [12] The field comparison of three measuring techniques for evaluation of the surface dust level in ventilation ducts
    Holopainen, R
    Asikainen, V
    Pasanen, P
    Seppänen, O
    INDOOR AIR, 2002, 12 (01) : 47 - 54
  • [13] COMPARISON OF THREE INDIRECT FIELD MEASURING METHODS FOR FOREST CANOPY LEAF AREA INDEX ESTIMATION
    Fu, Zhuo
    Wang, Jindi
    Song, Jinling
    Zhou, Hongmin
    Huang, Huaguo
    Chen, Baisong
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1-5, 2009, : 3391 - +
  • [14] A comparison of three common indices used for estimating Nantucket pine tip moth damage in the field
    Fettig, CJ
    Berisford, CW
    JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1999, 34 (02) : 203 - 209
  • [15] Comparison of two micrometeorological and three enclosure methods for measuring ammonia emission after slurry application in two field experiments
    Kamp, Jesper N.
    Hafner, Sasha D.
    Huijsmans, Jan
    van Boheemen, Koen
    Gotze, Hannah
    Pacholski, Andreas
    Pedersen, Johanna
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2024, 354
  • [16] Measuring geographic access to emergency obstetric care: a comparison of travel time estimates modelled using Google Maps Directions API and AccessMod in three Nigerian conurbations
    Macharia, Peter M.
    Wong, Kerry L. M.
    Benova, Lenka
    Wang, Jia
    Makanga, Prestige Tatenda
    Ray, Nicolas
    Banke-Thomas, Aduragbemi
    GEOSPATIAL HEALTH, 2024, 19 (01)