Prevention of childhood poisoning in the home: overview of systematic reviews and a systematic review of primary studies

被引:26
作者
Wynn, Persephone M. [1 ]
Zou, Kun [1 ]
Young, Ben [1 ]
Majsak-Newman, Gosia [2 ]
Hawkins, Adrian [3 ]
Kay, Bryony [4 ]
Mhizha-Murira, Jacqueline [1 ]
Kendrick, Denise [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Div Primary Care, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Univ E Anglia, NHS Clin Res & Trials Unit, Norwich Med Sch, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[3] Royal Victoria Infirm, Great North Childrens Hosp, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 4LP, Tyne & Wear, England
[4] Univ W England, Ctr Child & Adolescent Hlth, Bristol BS16 1QY, Avon, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
poisoning; childhood; unintentional injuries; prevention; home; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; YOUNG-CHILDREN; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; PRIMARY-CARE; LOW-INCOME; SAFETY INTERVENTION; PEDIATRIC INJURIES; PROGRAM; COMMUNITY; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1080/17457300.2015.1032978
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Unintentional poisoning is a significant child public health problem. This systematic overview of reviews, supplemented with a systematic review of recently published primary studies synthesizes evidence on non-legislative interventions to reduce childhood poisonings in the home with particular reference to interventions that could be implemented by Children's Centres in England or community health or social care services in other high income countries. Thirteen systematic reviews, two meta-analyses and 47 primary studies were identified. The interventions most commonly comprised education, provision of cupboard/drawer locks, and poison control centre (PCC) number stickers. Meta-analyses and primary studies provided evidence that interventions improved poison prevention practices. Twenty eight per cent of studies reporting safe medicine storage (OR from meta-analysis 1.57, 95% CI 1.22-2.02), 23% reporting safe storage of other products (OR from meta-analysis 1.63, 95% CI 1.22-2.17) and 46% reporting availability of PCC numbers (OR from meta-analysis 3.67, 95% CI 1.84-7.33) demonstrated significant effects favouring the intervention group. There was a lack of evidence that interventions reduced poisoning rates. Parents should be provided with poison prevention education, cupboard/drawer locks and emergency contact numbers to use in the event of a poisoning. Further research is required to determine whether improving poison prevention practices reduces poisoning rates.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 28
页数:26
相关论文
共 78 条
[11]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2013, PROT ON YOU LOV POIS
[12]  
Child Accident Protection Trust, 2013, POIS RED HOSP ADM
[13]   A randomised controlled trial of general practitioner safety advice for families with children under 5 years [J].
Clamp, M ;
Kendrick, D .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7144) :1576-1579
[14]   PROMOTING CHILDRENS HOME SAFETY [J].
COLVER, AF ;
HUTCHINSON, PJ ;
JUDSON, EC .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1982, 285 (6349) :1177-1180
[15]   Network Meta-analysis to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase the Uptake of Smoke Alarms [J].
Cooper, Nicola J. ;
Kendrick, Denise ;
Achana, Felix ;
Dhiman, Paula ;
He, Zhimin ;
Wynn, Persephone ;
Le Cozannet, Elodie ;
Saramago, Pedro ;
Sutton, Alex J. .
EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS, 2012, 34 (01) :32-45
[16]  
Department of Trade & Industry (UK), 2002, HOM LEIS ACC SURV SY
[17]   Individual-level injury prevention strategies in the clinical setting [J].
DiGuiseppi, C ;
Roberts, IG .
FUTURE OF CHILDREN, 2000, 10 (01) :53-82
[18]  
DiGuiseppi C., 1996, GUIDE CLIN PREVENTIV, P659
[19]  
Elkan R., 2000, Health Technology Assessment, V4, P1
[20]  
FERGUSSON DM, 1982, PEDIATRICS, V69, P515