Systematic Review of Robotic Surgery in Gynecology: Robotic Techniques Compared With Laparoscopy and Laparotomy

被引:148
作者
Gala, Rajiv B. [1 ]
Margulies, Rebecca [2 ]
Steinberg, Adam [3 ]
Murphy, Miles [4 ]
Lukban, James [5 ]
Jeppson, Peter [6 ]
Aschkenazi, Sarit [7 ]
Olivera, Cedric [8 ]
South, Mary [9 ]
Lowenstein, Lior [10 ]
Schaffer, Joseph [11 ]
Balk, Ethan M. [12 ]
Sung, Vivian [6 ]
机构
[1] Ochsner Clin Sch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New Orleans, LA USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Oakland, CA USA
[3] Univ Connecticut, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hartford Hosp, Hartford, CT 06112 USA
[4] Inst Female Pelv Med & Reconstruct Surg, N Wales, PA USA
[5] Eastern Virginia Med Sch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Norfolk, VA 23501 USA
[6] Brown Univ, Alpert Med Sch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Women & Infants Hosp Rhode Isl, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[7] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Waukesha, WI USA
[8] Suny Downstate Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Brooklyn, NY 11203 USA
[9] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
[10] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Urogynecol Serv, Rambam Hlth Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
[11] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[12] Tufts Med Ctr, Inst Clin Res & Hlth Policy Studies, Ctr Clin Evidence Synth, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Gynecologic surgery; Learning curve; Robotic surgery; Systematic review; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER; ASSISTED HYSTERECTOMY; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; COST-ANALYSIS; LYMPHADENECTOMY; SACROCOLPOPEXY; QUALITY; OBESE; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2013.11.010
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Systematic Review Group performed a systematic review of both randomized and observational studies to compare robotic vs nonrobotic surgical approaches (laparoscopic, abdominal, and vaginal) for treatment of both benign and malignant gynecologic indications to compare surgical and patient-centered outcomes, costs, and adverse events associated with the various surgical approaches. MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to May 15, 2012, for English-language studies with terms related to robotic surgery and gynecology. Studies of any design that included at least 30 women who had undergone robotic-assisted laparoscopic gynecologic surgery were included for review. The literature yielded 1213 citations, of which 97 full-text articles were reviewed. Forty-four studies (30 comparative and 14 noncomparative) met eligibility criteria. Study data were extracted into structured electronic forms and reconciled by a second, independent reviewer. Our analysis revealed that, compared with open surgery, robotic surgery consistently confers shorter hospital stay. The proficiency plateau scents to be lower for robotic surgery than for conventional laparoscopy. Of the various gynecologic applications, there seems to be evidence that renders robotic techniques advantageous over traditional open surgery for management of endometrial cancer. However, insofar as superiority, conflicting data are obtained when comparing robotics vs laparoscopic techniques. Therefore, the specific method of minimally invasive surgery, whether conventional laparoscopy or robotic surgery, should be tailored to patient selection, surgeon ability, and equipment availability. (c) 2014 AAGL. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 361
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Assessing the cost effectiveness of robotics in urological surgery - a systematic review [J].
Ahmed, Kamran ;
Ibrahim, Amel ;
Wang, Tim T. ;
Khan, Nuzhath ;
Challacombe, Ben ;
Khan, Muhammed Shamim ;
Dasgupta, Prokar .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (10) :1544-1556
[2]   Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Myomectomy Is an Improvement Over Laparotomy in Women with a Limited Number of Myomas [J].
Ascher-Walsh, Charles J. ;
Capes, Tracy L. .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 17 (03) :306-310
[3]  
Atkins D, 2004, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V328, P1490
[4]   Robotic-Assisted, Laparoscopic, and Abdominal Myomectomy: A Comparison of Surgical Outcomes [J].
Barakat, Ehab E. ;
Bedaiwy, Mohamed A. ;
Zimberg, Stephen ;
Nutter, Benjamin ;
Nosseir, Mohsen ;
Falcone, Tommaso .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 117 (02) :256-265
[5]   Cost Comparison Among Robotic, Laparoscopic, and Open Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer [J].
Barnett, Jason C. ;
Judd, John P. ;
Wu, Jennifer M. ;
Scales, Charles D., Jr. ;
Myers, Evan R. ;
Havrilesky, Laura J. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 116 (03) :685-693
[6]   Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy [J].
Bedient, Carrie E. ;
Magrina, Javier F. ;
Noble, Brie N. ;
Kho, Rosanne M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (06) :566.e1-566.e5
[7]   Cost Analysis of Abdominal, Laparoscopic, and Robotic-Assisted Myomectomies [J].
Behera, Millie A. ;
Likes, Creighton E., III ;
Judd, John P. ;
Barnett, Jason C. ;
Havrilesky, Laura J. ;
Wu, Jennifer M. .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 19 (01) :52-57
[8]   Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques [J].
Bell, Maria C. ;
Torgerson, Jenny ;
Seshadri-Kreaden, Usha ;
Suttle, Allison Wierda ;
Hunt, Sharon .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 111 (03) :407-411
[9]   A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy [J].
Boggess, John F. ;
Gehrig, Paola A. ;
Cantrell, Leigh ;
Shafer, Aaron ;
Ridgway, Mildred ;
Skinner, Elizabeth N. ;
Fowler, Wesley C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (04) :357.e1-357.e7
[10]   Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A 3-year experience [J].
Cantrell, Leigh A. ;
Mendivil, Alberto ;
Gehrig, Paola A. ;
Boggess, John F. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 117 (02) :260-265