Clinical Significance of Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening for Trisomy 7: Cohort Study and Literature Review

被引:9
|
作者
Zhu, Xiaofan [1 ,2 ]
Lam, Doris Yuk Man [3 ]
Chau, Matthew Hoi Kin [2 ]
Xue, Shuwen [2 ]
Dai, Peng [1 ]
Zhao, Ganye [1 ]
Cao, Ye [2 ]
Cheung, Sunny Wai Hung [3 ]
Kwok, Yvonne Ka Yin [2 ]
Choy, Kwong Wai [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Kong, Xiangdong [1 ]
Leung, Tak Yeung [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Genet & Prenatal Diag Ctr, Zhengzhou 450052, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Xcelom Ltd, NIPT Dept, NGS Lab, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Shenzhen Res Inst, Shenzhen 518100, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Baylor Coll Med Joint Ctr Med Genet, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
non-invasive prenatal screening; cell-free DNA screening; cell-free fetal DNA; trisomy; 7; uniparental disomy 7;
D O I
10.3390/genes12010011
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Trisomy 7 is the most frequently observed type of rare autosomal trisomies in genome-wide non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS). Currently, the clinical significance of trisomy 7 NIPS-positive results is still unknown. We reviewed two independent cohorts from two laboratories where similar NIPS metrics were applied. A total of 70,441 singleton cases who underwent genome-wide NIPS were analyzed, among which 39 pregnancies were positive for trisomy 7, yielding a screen-positive rate of 0.055% (39/70,441). There were 28 cases with invasive testing results available; the positive predictive value (PPV) was 3.6% (1/28). We then searched the published NIPS studies to generate a large cohort of 437,873 pregnancies and identified 247 cases (0.056%) that were screened positive for trisomy 7. The overall PPV was 3.4% (4/118) in the combined data. The presence of uniparental disomy 7 was not detected in the NIPS trisomy 7-positive pregnancies with normal fetal karyotype. Among the 85 cases with pregnancy outcome available in combined data, 88.2% were normal live births, 14.1% had intrauterine growth restriction, preterm birth or low birth weight, 3.5% presented with ultrasound abnormality, and no fetal loss was observed. Our data provide valuable information for counseling and management of trisomy 7-positive NIPS pregnancies.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Non-invasive Prenatal Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy: Comparison with Cytogenetic Results
    Jeanne M. Meck
    Girish V. Putcha
    Athena M. Cherry
    Current Genetic Medicine Reports, 2015, 3 (3) : 127 - 136
  • [22] Clinical Efficiency of Non-invasive Prenatal Screening for Common Trisomies in Low-Risk and Twin Pregnancies
    Xu, Yanfei
    Jin, Pengzhen
    Lei, Yu
    Qian, Yeqing
    Xu, Yuqing
    Wang, Miaomiao
    Jin, Jinglei
    Yin, Yixuan
    Dong, Minyue
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2021, 12
  • [23] Non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomy 13: more harm than good?
    Verweij, E. J.
    de Boer, M. A.
    Oepkes, D.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 44 (01) : 112 - 114
  • [24] Editorial: Unravelling the basis of non-invasive prenatal screening results
    De Falco, Luigia
    Pelo, Elisabetta
    Qi, Zhongxia
    Novelli, Antonio
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2023, 14
  • [25] Aneuploidy screening by non-invasive prenatal testing in twin pregnancy
    Fosler, L.
    Winters, P.
    Jones, K. W.
    Curnow, K. J.
    Sehnert, A. J.
    Bhatt, S.
    Platt, L. D.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 49 (04) : 470 - 477
  • [26] Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening: Navigating the Relevant Legal Norms
    Murdoch, Blake
    Caulfield, Timothy
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2020, 42 (10) : 1271 - 1275
  • [27] Prenatal screening in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing: a Nationwide cross-sectional survey of obstetrician knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice
    Yang, Liying
    Tan, Wei Ching
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [28] Non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal chromosome abnormalities: review of clinical and ethical issues
    Gekas, Jean
    Langlois, Sylvie
    Ravitsky, Vardit
    Audibert, Francois
    van den Berg, David Gradus
    Haidar, Hazar
    Rousseau, Francois
    APPLICATION OF CLINICAL GENETICS, 2016, 9 : 15 - 26
  • [29] Prenatal diagnosis of mosaic trisomy 8: Clinical report and literature review
    Chen, Chih-Ping
    Chen, Ming
    Pan, Yi-Ju
    Su, Yi-Ning
    Chern, Schu-Rern
    Tsai, Fuu-Jen
    Chen, Yu-Ting
    Wang, Wayseen
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 50 (03): : 331 - 338
  • [30] Adoption of a non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) in prenatal screening in Moscow: first results
    Olenev, Anton S.
    Baranova, Elena E.
    Sagaydak, Olesya, V
    Galaktionova, Alexandra M.
    Kuznetsova, Ekaterina S.
    Kaplanova, Madina T.
    Belenikin, Maxim S.
    Songolova, Ekaterina N.
    RUSSIAN OPEN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 10 (01)