Guidelines for statistical analysis of percentage of syllables stuttered data

被引:43
作者
Jones, Mark
Onslow, Mark
Packman, Ann
Gebski, Val
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Populat Hlth, Brisbane, Qld 4067, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Australian Stuttering Res Ctr, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Natl Hlth & Med Res Council, Clin Trials Ctr, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
来源
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH | 2006年 / 49卷 / 04期
关键词
stuttering; statistical analysis; percentage of syllables stuttered; power; type I error; gamma distribution; transformation;
D O I
10.1044/1092-4388(2006/062)
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop guidelines for the statistical analysis of percentage of syllables stuttered (%SS) data in stuttering research. Method: Data on %SS from various independent sources were used to develop a statistical model to describe this type of data. On the basis of this model, %55 data were simulated with varying means, standard deviations, and sample sizes. Four methods for analyzing %SS were compared. Results: Results suggested that %SS data can be adequately modeled with a gamma distribution. Simulations based on a gamma distribution showed that all 4 analysis techniques performed favorably with respect to Type I error except for F. E. Satterthwaite's (1946) t test, which had increased Type I error on two occasions. Power was generally lower for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test compared with the other methods. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) performed on square-root-transformed data performed adequately under all scenarios, but ANOVA performed on nontransformed data and Satterthwaite's t test performed poorly when sample sizes were small or when sample sizes and variances of the groups were markedly different. Conclusions: Standard techniques such as t test and ANOVA are appropriate for most analysis scenarios with %SS data. Two occasions when this is not the case are when sample size is small, with fewer than 20 in each group, or when sample sizes and variances of the groups are markedly different. Under these circumstances, analyses should be based on standard methods, with a suitable transformation performed prior to analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:867 / 878
页数:12
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Treatment of chronic stuttering: outcomes from a student training clinic [J].
Block, S ;
Onslow, M ;
Packman, A ;
Gray, B ;
Dacakis, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2005, 40 (04) :455-466
[2]  
Bloodstein O., 1995, A Handbook of Stuttering, V5th
[3]   THE EFFECTS OF VIOLATIONS OF ASSUMPTIONS UNDERLYING THE T-TEST [J].
BONEAU, CA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1960, 57 (01) :49-64
[4]  
Clopper CJ, 1934, BIOMETRIKA, V26, P404, DOI 10.2307/2331986
[5]  
Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
[6]   THE RELIABILITY OF OBSERVATIONAL DATA .2. ISSUES IN THE IDENTIFICATION AND MEASUREMENT OF STUTTERING EVENTS [J].
CORDES, AK ;
INGHAM, RJ .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1994, 37 (02) :279-294
[7]  
D'Agostino R.B., 1986, GOODNESS OF FIT
[8]  
Fishman GS., 1978, PRINCIPLES DISCRETE
[9]   SOME PROPERTIES OF BETA-DISTRIBUTIONS AND GAMMA-DISTRIBUTIONS [J].
JAMBUNATHAN, MV .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1954, 25 (02) :401-405
[10]   Treating stuttering in young children: Predicting treatment time in the lidcombe program [J].
Jones, M ;
Onslow, M ;
Harrison, E ;
Packman, A .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2000, 43 (06) :1440-1450