Two miniplates versus 3-dimensional plate in the management of mandibular subcondylar fractures: a retrospective analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Rai, Anshul [1 ]
Jain, Anuj [2 ]
Thukral, Rishi [3 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Dent, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
[2] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Trauma & Emergency Med, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
[3] Atal Bihari Vajpayee Govt Med Coll, Dept Dent, Vidisha, Madhya Pradesh, India
来源
ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY-HEIDELBERG | 2021年 / 25卷 / 04期
关键词
Mandibular subcondylar fracture; Open reduction; Internal fixation; 3-Dimensional plate; 2; Miniplates; CONDYLAR FRACTURES; INTERNAL-FIXATION; OPEN REDUCTION; TRANSPAROTID APPROACH; CLINICAL-EVALUATION; OSTEOSYNTHESIS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s10006-021-00938-y
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose The aim of the present study was to evaluate the outcomes in patients with subcondylar fracture of mandible treated with 2 single miniplates compared to a 3-dimensional (3D) plate. Patients and methods This is a retrospective study which included patients diagnosed and treated for mandibular subcondylar fracture from January 2015 to December 2019. Included patients were divided into two groups, group 1: 2 miniplate group and group 2: 3D plate group. The data was obtained from the patients' records and evaluated for various outcomes including occlusal stability, postoperative complications like plate fracture, non-union, plate or screw loosening, and plate or screw infection leading to implant removal, wound dehiscence, salivary fistula, and facial nerve paralysis. The statistical analysis was performed using chi square test and Student's t test. Results A total 58 patients (43 males and 15 females) were enrolled in the two groups ranging from 21 to 59 years. A total of 35 patients were recruited in group 1, whereas 23 patients were recruited in group 2. There was no statistically significant difference in the two groups with regard to the age range, gender, diagnosis, side of fracture, and accompanying fractures. Occlusal instability, wound dehiscence, and facial nerve paralysis was found in both the groups. Group 1 had 1 patient which required implant removal due to screw loosing, whereas group 2 had 2 patients which required plate removal due to plate fracture. One patient in group 2 required second surgery for fixation of fracture due to non-union. One patient in group 1 developed a sialocele postoperatively. However, there was no statistically significant difference in any of the variables assessed among the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion The results of our study indicate that the 2 miniplates and 3D plate system are effective in the management of mandibular subcondylar fractures.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 461
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Two miniplates versus 3-dimensional plate in the management of mandibular subcondylar fractures: a retrospective analysis
    Anshul Rai
    Anuj Jain
    Rishi Thukral
    Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2021, 25 : 457 - 461
  • [2] Two Miniplates Versus Three Dimensional Plate in Management of Mandibular Condylar Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kuna, Santhosh Kumar
    Jain, Anuj
    Kuna, Vishala
    CRANIOMAXILLOFACIAL TRAUMA & RECONSTRUCTION, 2024, 17 (04) : NP332 - NP344
  • [3] Fixation of subcondylar fractures of the mandible: a randomized clinical trial comparing one trapezoidal plate with two miniplates
    Adhikari, M.
    Bhatt, K.
    Yadav, R.
    Mandal, J.
    Bhutia, O.
    Roychoudhury, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 50 (06) : 756 - 762
  • [4] Which fixation methods are better between three-dimensional anatomical plate and two miniplates for the mandibular subcondylar fracture open treatment?
    Sukegawa, Shintaro
    Kanno, Takahiro
    Masui, Masanori
    Sukegawa-Takahashi, Yuka
    Kishimoto, Tsukasa
    Sato, Ai
    Furuki, Yoshihiko
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 47 (05) : 771 - 777
  • [5] Three-dimensional versus standard miniplate, lag screws versus miniplates, locking plate versus non-locking miniplates: Management of mandibular fractures, a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wusiman, Patiguli
    Taxifulati, Dilidaer
    Li Weidong
    Moming, Adili
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2019, 14 (01) : 66 - 80
  • [6] Three-dimensional titanium miniplates for fixation of subcondylar mandibular fractures: Comparison of five designs using patient-specific finite element analysis
    Albogha, Mhd Hassan
    Mori, Yoshihide
    Takahashi, Ichiro
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 46 (03) : 391 - 397
  • [7] Comparison of two L shaped Plate on Plate Versus Single Conventional L Miniplate in Fixation of Subcondylar Mandibular Fractures
    Pappachan, Biju
    Agrawal, Raghav
    JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY, 2019, 18 (03) : 440 - 446
  • [8] Comparison of two L shaped Plate on Plate Versus Single Conventional L Miniplate in Fixation of Subcondylar Mandibular Fractures
    Biju Pappachan
    Raghav Agrawal
    Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2019, 18 : 440 - 446
  • [9] One miniplate versus two miniplates in the fixation of mandibular angle fractures. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Vitkos, Evangelos N.
    Papadopoulos, Konstantinos A.
    Dimasis, Periklis
    Weissinger, Christian
    Kyrgidis, Athanassios
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 123 (06) : E865 - E873
  • [10] A Comparative Evaluation of 2.0mm Two-Dimensional Miniplates Versus 2.0mm Three-Dimensional Miniplates in Mandibular Fractures
    Sarepally, Godvine
    Seethamsetty, Swetcha
    Karpe, Tanveer
    Nasyam, Fazil A.
    Fatima, Umayra
    Fatema, Raia
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (01)