Patient-reported recovery after enhanced colorectal cancer surgery: a longitudinal six-month follow-up study

被引:20
|
作者
Jakobsson, Jenny [1 ,2 ]
Idvall, Ewa [2 ,3 ]
Wann-Hansson, Christine [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[2] Malmo Univ, Dept Care Sci, Malmo, Sweden
[3] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Intens Care & Perioperat Med, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[4] Lund Univ, Swedish Inst Hlth Sci, Lund, Sweden
关键词
Postoperative recovery; PRP; Colorectal surgery; ERAS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION; POSTOPERATIVE RECOVERY; RECTAL-CANCER; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; INFORMATION; MANAGEMENT; CARCINOMA; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00384-014-1939-2
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a modern regime of care, and numerous studies have proved its beneficial impact on recovery after colorectal surgery. However, little is known about patients' continuing recovery after discharge. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to describe patient-reported recovery after colorectal cancer surgery in the context of ERAS from the day of discharge until 1 and 6 months after surgery. Assessments were made at discharge, at 1 month and at 6 months after surgery using the questionnaire Postoperative Recovery Profile (PRP). In all, 119 patients recovering from abdominoperineal resection, rectal resection, or colonic resection completed all three assessments. The global score of recovery showed that no patient experienced being fully recovered at discharge. After rectal resection, patients frequently reported being not at all recovered. One month after surgery, patients recovering from colonic resection reported significant improvements regarding 11 of 17 questionnaire items, whereas abdominoperineal resection patients reported no significant improvements regarding any item. Instead, significantly higher levels of problems were reported in the items fatigue, muscle weakness and feeling down. Rectal resection patients reported significant improvements between 1 and 6 months after surgery regarding 7 of 19 items. However, the item gastrointestinal function distinguished, as patients reported significant deterioration towards higher levels of problems 6 months after surgery. This study elucidates the difference between groups of colorectal patients and the diverse patterns of their recovery, implying different needs in terms of prolonged support after discharge.
引用
收藏
页码:989 / 998
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Symptom Trajectories Informing Patient Care After Lung Cancer Surgery: A Longitudinal Patient-Reported Outcome Study
    Tang, Li
    Yu, Hongfan
    Dai, Wei
    Yang, Xiaojun
    Wei, Xing
    Wang, Xin Shelley
    Cleeland, Charles S. S.
    Li, Qiang
    Shi, Qiuling
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (05) : 2607 - 2617
  • [22] Barriers and facilitators for participation in health promotion programs among employees: a six-month follow-up study
    Rongen, Anne
    Robroek, Suzan J. W.
    van Ginkel, Wouter
    Lindeboom, Dennis
    Altink, Bibielle
    Burdorf, Alex
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 14
  • [23] Patient functional recovery after a 23-h surgery - a prospective, follow-up study
    Ruohoaho, Ulla-Maija
    Aaltomaa, Sirpa
    Kokki, Hannu
    Anttila, Maarit
    Kokki, Merja
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2022, 407 (05) : 2133 - 2142
  • [24] Patient functional recovery after a 23-h surgery — a prospective, follow-up study
    Ulla-Maija Ruohoaho
    Sirpa Aaltomaa
    Hannu Kokki
    Maarit Anttila
    Merja Kokki
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2022, 407 : 2133 - 2142
  • [25] Longitudinal changes in pulmonary function and patient-reported outcomes after lung cancer surgery
    Shin, Sumin
    Kong, Sunga
    Kang, Danbee
    Lee, Genehee
    Cho, Jong Ho
    Shim, Young Mog
    Cho, Juhee
    Kim, Hong Kwan
    Park, Hye Yun
    RESPIRATORY RESEARCH, 2022, 23 (01) : 224
  • [26] How will early onset scoliosis surgery affect my child's future as a young adult? A follow-up study using patient-reported outcome measures
    Falkner, Dmitri A.
    Miller, Kyle J.
    Emans, John B.
    Thompson, George H.
    Smith, John T.
    Flynn, Jack M.
    Sawyer, Jeffrey R.
    SPINE DEFORMITY, 2024, 12 (06) : 1813 - 1822
  • [27] How needs and preferences of employees influence participation in health promotion programs: a six-month follow-up study
    Rongen, Anne
    Robroek, Suzan J. W.
    van Ginkel, Wouter
    Lindeboom, Dennis
    Pet, Martin
    Burdorf, Alex
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 14
  • [28] Follow-up after curative treatment for colorectal cancer: longitudinal evaluation of patient initiated follow-up in the first 12 months
    Batehup, L.
    Porter, K.
    Gage, H.
    Williams, P.
    Simmonds, P.
    Lowson, E.
    Dodson, L.
    Davies, N. J.
    Wagland, R.
    Winter, J. D.
    Richardson, A.
    Turner, A.
    Corner, J. L.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2017, 25 (07) : 2063 - 2073
  • [29] The Effect of Cannabidiol 3% on Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Dementia - Six-Month Follow-Up
    Alexandri, Foteini
    Papadopoulou, Lydia
    Tsolaki, Anthoula
    Papantoniou, Georgia
    Athanasiadis, Loukas
    Tsolaki, Magda
    CLINICAL GERONTOLOGIST, 2024, 47 (05) : 800 - 807
  • [30] Patient-reported patterns of follow-up care in the 'Aftercare in Blood Cancer Survivors' (ABC) study
    Baum, Julia
    Lax, Hildegard
    Lehmann, Nils
    Merkel-Jens, Anja
    Beelen, Dietrich W.
    Joeckel, Karl-Heinz
    Duehrsen, Ulrich
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 149 (12) : 10531 - 10542