Effectiveness of Mat Pilates or Equipment-Based Pilates Exercises in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:62
作者
Da Luz, Mauricio Antonio, Jr. [1 ]
Pena Costa, Leonardo Oliveira [1 ,2 ]
Fuhro, Fernanda Ferreira [3 ]
Taccolini Manzoni, Ana Carolina [3 ]
Bastos Oliveira, Naiane Teixeira [4 ]
Nunes Cabral, Cristina Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cidade Sao Paulo, Masters & Doctoral Programs Phys Therapy, BR-03071000 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] George Inst Global Hlth, Musculoskeletal Div, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Cidade Sao Paulo, Phys Therapy Dept, BR-03071000 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Cidade Sao Paulo, Masters & Doctoral Programs Phys Therapy, BR-03071000 Sao Paulo, Brazil
来源
PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2014年 / 94卷 / 05期
关键词
MOTOR CONTROL EXERCISES; FUNCTIONAL DISABILITY; EUROPEAN GUIDELINES; ROLAND-MORRIS; PERSISTENT; THERAPY; QUESTIONNAIRE; METAANALYSIS; PROGNOSIS; VERSIONS;
D O I
10.2522/ptj.20130277
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. The Pilates method has been widely used to treat patients with chronic low back pain. Pilates exercises can be performed in 2 ways: by using specific equipment or without it (also known as mat Plates). There are no studies, however, that have compared the effectiveness of mat Pilates with that of equipment-based Pilates. Objective. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of mat Pilates and equipment-based Pilates in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Design. A 2-arm randomized controlled trial with a blinded assessor was conducted. Setting. The study was conducted at a private physical therapy clinic in Brazil. Patients. Eighty-six patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain participated. Intervention. The patients were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups: a mat Pilates group (n = 43) and an equipment-based Pilates group (n = 43). The participants in both groups attended 12 Pilates sessions over a period of 6 weeks. Measurements. The primary outcomes were pain intensity and disability. The secondary outcomes were global perceived effect, patient's specific disability, and kinesiophobia. A blinded assessor evaluated the outcomes at baseline and 6 weeks and 6 months after randomization. Results. After 6 months, there was a statistically significant difference for disability (mean difference=3.0 points, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.6 to 5.4), specific disability (mean difference = -1.1 points, 95% CI = -2.0 to 0.1), and kinesiophobia (mean difference = 4.9 points, 95% CI = 1.6 to 8.2) in favor of equipment-based Pilates. No differences were found for the remaining outcomes. Conclusions. Equipment-based Pilates was superior to mat Pilates in the 6-month follow-up for the outcomes of disability and kinesiophobia. These benefits were not observed for pain intensity and global perceived effect in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain.
引用
收藏
页码:623 / 631
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
[31]   Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain - Towards international consensus regarding minimal important change [J].
Ostelo, Raymond W. J. G. ;
Deyo, Rick A. ;
Stratford, P. ;
Waddell, Gordon ;
Croft, Peter ;
Von Korff, Michael ;
Bouter, Lex M. ;
de Vet, Henrica C. .
SPINE, 2008, 33 (01) :90-94
[32]   Clinimetric Testing of Three Self-report Outcome Measures for Low Back Pain Patients in Brazil Which One Is the Best? [J].
Pena Costa, Leonardo Oliveira ;
Maher, Chris G. ;
Latimer, Jane ;
Ferreira, Paulo Henrique ;
Ferreira, Manuela Loureiro ;
Pozzi, Giovanni Campos ;
Andrade Freitas, Ludmilla Motta .
SPINE, 2008, 33 (22) :2459-2463
[33]   Psychometric characteristics of the Brazilian-Portuguese versions of the Functional Rating Index and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire [J].
Pena Costa, Leonardo Oliveira ;
Maher, Chris G. ;
Latimer, Jane ;
Ferreira, Paulo Henrique ;
Pozzi, Giovanni Campos ;
Ribeiro, Rodrigo Nogueira .
SPINE, 2007, 32 (17) :1902-1907
[34]   Comparing the Pilates method with no exercise or lumbar stabilization for pain and functionality in patients with chronic low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Pereira, Ligia M. ;
Obara, Karen ;
Dias, Josilainne M. ;
Menacho, Maryela O. ;
Guariglia, Debora A. ;
Schiavoni, Durcelina ;
Pereira, Hugo M. ;
Cardoso, Jefferson Rosa .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2012, 26 (01) :10-20
[35]  
Posadzki Paul, 2011, Complement Ther Clin Pract, V17, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.ctcp.2010.09.005
[36]  
Quinn K., 2011, Physiotherapy Ireland, V32, P5, DOI DOI 10.3233/PPR-2011-32102
[37]  
Rajpal N., 2008, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, V1, P33
[38]   Progression Models in Resistance Training for Healthy Adults [J].
Ratamess, Nicolas A. ;
Alvar, Brent A. ;
Evetoch, Tammy E. ;
Housh, Terry J. ;
Ben Kibler, W. ;
Kraemer, William J. ;
Triplett, N. Travis .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2009, 41 (03) :687-708
[39]   A STUDY OF THE NATURAL-HISTORY OF BACK PAIN .1. DEVELOPMENT OF A RELIABLE AND SENSITIVE MEASURE OF DISABILITY IN LOW-BACK-PAIN [J].
ROLAND, M ;
MORRIS, R .
SPINE, 1983, 8 (02) :141-144
[40]   Pilates-based therapeutic exercise: Effect on subjects with nonspecific chronic low back pain and functional disability: A randomized controlled trial [J].
Rydeard, Rochenda ;
Leger, Andrew ;
Smith, Drew .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2006, 36 (07) :472-484