Postural Change in Intraocular Pressure: A Comparison of Measurement With a Goldmann Tonometer, Tonopen XL, Pneumatonometer, and HA-2

被引:23
|
作者
Barkana, Yaniv [1 ]
机构
[1] Assaf Harofe Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, IL-70300 Zerifin, Israel
关键词
postural; intraocular pressure; Goldmann; pneumatonometer; Tonopen; Perkins; CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS; OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA; BODY POSITION; AGREEMENT; OFFICE; PATTERN; HEAD; IOP;
D O I
10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182a0762f
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose:To compare directly the results of 4 tonometers in measuring postural change in the intraocular pressure (IOP) between sitting and lying body positions.Methods:In 19 healthy subjects, the IOP was measured both eyes with a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) while sitting, then using the same GAT with the subject in the left lateral decubitus position after lying for 15 minutes, using a novel system comprising a motorized bed and a modified slit-lamp table. On the next day, the sitting IOP was measured in 1 eye using GAT, and additionally in random order Tonopen XL and pneumatonometer. Then subjects were asked to lie down, and the IOP was measured with these tonometers and also with a hand-held applanation tonometer (HA-2) after lying for 15 minutes and for 45 minutes; measurements were made with subjects in the supine position except with GAT.Results:There were 10 male and 9 female subjects, with a mean age of 33.012.4 years. On day 1, the sitting GAT IOP (mm Hg) was 13.7 +/- 3.0 right eye and 13.6 +/- 2.8 left eye (P=0.7) and the lying GAT IOP was 17.8 +/- 3.5 right eye and 18.1 +/- 3.2 left eye (P=0.3 for inter-eye postural IOP change). Postural change in the right and the left eyes was moderately correlated, with a coefficient of 0.453. On day 2, postural changes after lying for 15 minutes as measured with a GAT, a Tonopen, a pneumatonometer, and a HA-2 were 4.9 +/- 2.6, 1.6 +/- 1.8, 4.2 +/- 2.0, and 3.1 +/- 2.7, respectively. After lying for 45 minutes, it decreased to 3.3 +/- 2.1, 1.1 +/- 4.3, 3.1 +/- 2.5, and 2.6 +/- 3.3, respectively; this IOP decrease was statistically significant for the GAT and the pneumatonometer. The inter-subject variability was large, as in some subjects there was nearly no postural change in the IOP, whereas in some the IOP increased by 8 to 10 mm Hg. Ninety-five percent limits of agreement showed a poor agreement between GAT and the other 3 tonometers in the sitting and lying IOPs and postural IOP changes measured.Conclusions:The average postural IOP change was similar when measured with GAT and a pneumatonometer, smaller with a hand-held GAT, and much smaller with a Tonopen XL. This change decreased significantly when lying between the 15- and 45-minute time points. The inter-subject variability in postural IOP was remarkable, consistent with previous reports, suggesting the importance of this parameter in clinical glaucoma practice. Inter-device agreement was poor and similar to previous reports.
引用
收藏
页码:E23 / E28
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Transpalpebral measurement of intraocular pressure using the Diaton tonometer versus standard Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Li, Yuehua
    Shi, Jingming
    Duan, Xuanchu
    Fan, Fang
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 248 (12) : 1765 - 1770
  • [32] A comparison of postural and diurnal variations in intraocular pressure using the iCare rebound tonometer and Perkins applanation tonometer in admitted adults in Kenya
    Chikasirimobi, Timothy G.
    Ndinyo, Mercy
    Ondieki, Maxine N.
    Miti, Isaac
    Ejiochi-Iyoke, Ndidi J.
    Osuagwu, Uchechukwu L.
    Zeried, Ferial M.
    Agho, Kingsley
    Ogbuehi, Kelechi C.
    Mashige, Khathutshelo P.
    AFRICAN VISION AND EYE HEALTH JOURNAL, 2021, 80 (01):
  • [33] A comparison of intraocular pressure values obtained with the Tono-Pachymeter NT530P iCare (R) rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer
    Rampersad, N.
    Mashige, K. P.
    Jhetamt, S.
    AFRICAN VISION AND EYE HEALTH JOURNAL, 2011, 70 (03):
  • [34] Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the portable PT100 noncontact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Salim, Sarwat
    Linn, Daniel J.
    Echols, James R., II
    Netland, Peter A.
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 3 : 341 - 344
  • [35] Comparison between intraocular pressure spikes with water loading and postural change
    Chong, Calum W. K.
    Wang, Sarah B.
    Jain, Neeranjali S.
    Bank, Cassandra S.
    Singh, Ravjit
    Bank, Allan
    Francis, Ian C.
    Agar, Ashish
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 44 (09) : 768 - 775
  • [36] Agreement of intraocular pressure measurement with Corvis ST, non-contact tonometer, and Goldmann applanation tonometer in children with ocular hypertension and related factors
    Li, Hou-Gang
    Chen, Yan-Hui
    Lin, Fang
    Li, Si-Yu
    Liu, Qing-Hua
    Yin, Chun-Ge
    Chen, Xi-Yue
    Zhang, Xin-Jie
    Qu, Yue
    Hui, Yan-Nian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 16 (10) : 1601 - 1607
  • [37] Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement with Schiotz tonometer and Tono-Pen Vet tonometer in healthy dogs
    Wrzesniewska, Karolina
    Madany, Jacek
    Winiarczyk, Dagmara
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2018, 62 (02) : 243 - 247
  • [38] Intraocular pressure measurements with the Proview™ self-tonometer in comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes
    Meyer, M. W.
    Yevelenko, V.
    Hoy, L.
    Meyer, A.
    Erb, C.
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2006, 223 (11) : 899 - 903
  • [39] Comparison of intraocular pressure as measured by three different non-contact tonometers and goldmann applanation tonometer for non-glaucomatous subjects
    Seung Pil Bang
    Chong Eun Lee
    Yu Cheol Kim
    BMC Ophthalmology, 17
  • [40] Comparison of intraocular pressure as measured by three different non-contact tonometers and goldmann applanation tonometer for non-glaucomatous subjects
    Bang, Seung Pil
    Lee, Chong Eun
    Kim, Yu Cheol
    BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 17