Postural Change in Intraocular Pressure: A Comparison of Measurement With a Goldmann Tonometer, Tonopen XL, Pneumatonometer, and HA-2

被引:23
|
作者
Barkana, Yaniv [1 ]
机构
[1] Assaf Harofe Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, IL-70300 Zerifin, Israel
关键词
postural; intraocular pressure; Goldmann; pneumatonometer; Tonopen; Perkins; CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS; OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA; BODY POSITION; AGREEMENT; OFFICE; PATTERN; HEAD; IOP;
D O I
10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182a0762f
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose:To compare directly the results of 4 tonometers in measuring postural change in the intraocular pressure (IOP) between sitting and lying body positions.Methods:In 19 healthy subjects, the IOP was measured both eyes with a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) while sitting, then using the same GAT with the subject in the left lateral decubitus position after lying for 15 minutes, using a novel system comprising a motorized bed and a modified slit-lamp table. On the next day, the sitting IOP was measured in 1 eye using GAT, and additionally in random order Tonopen XL and pneumatonometer. Then subjects were asked to lie down, and the IOP was measured with these tonometers and also with a hand-held applanation tonometer (HA-2) after lying for 15 minutes and for 45 minutes; measurements were made with subjects in the supine position except with GAT.Results:There were 10 male and 9 female subjects, with a mean age of 33.012.4 years. On day 1, the sitting GAT IOP (mm Hg) was 13.7 +/- 3.0 right eye and 13.6 +/- 2.8 left eye (P=0.7) and the lying GAT IOP was 17.8 +/- 3.5 right eye and 18.1 +/- 3.2 left eye (P=0.3 for inter-eye postural IOP change). Postural change in the right and the left eyes was moderately correlated, with a coefficient of 0.453. On day 2, postural changes after lying for 15 minutes as measured with a GAT, a Tonopen, a pneumatonometer, and a HA-2 were 4.9 +/- 2.6, 1.6 +/- 1.8, 4.2 +/- 2.0, and 3.1 +/- 2.7, respectively. After lying for 45 minutes, it decreased to 3.3 +/- 2.1, 1.1 +/- 4.3, 3.1 +/- 2.5, and 2.6 +/- 3.3, respectively; this IOP decrease was statistically significant for the GAT and the pneumatonometer. The inter-subject variability was large, as in some subjects there was nearly no postural change in the IOP, whereas in some the IOP increased by 8 to 10 mm Hg. Ninety-five percent limits of agreement showed a poor agreement between GAT and the other 3 tonometers in the sitting and lying IOPs and postural IOP changes measured.Conclusions:The average postural IOP change was similar when measured with GAT and a pneumatonometer, smaller with a hand-held GAT, and much smaller with a Tonopen XL. This change decreased significantly when lying between the 15- and 45-minute time points. The inter-subject variability in postural IOP was remarkable, consistent with previous reports, suggesting the importance of this parameter in clinical glaucoma practice. Inter-device agreement was poor and similar to previous reports.
引用
收藏
页码:E23 / E28
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the XPERT noncontact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Popovich, KS
    Shields, MB
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 1997, 6 (01) : 44 - 46
  • [22] Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the digital tonometer TGDc-01 'PRA' and the Goldmann applanation tonometer
    Meyer, MW
    Gockeln, R
    Hoy, L
    Meyer, A
    Erb, C
    OPHTHALMIC RESEARCH, 2004, 36 (05) : 250 - 254
  • [23] Comparison of intraocular pressure obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometer, Corvis ST and an airpuff tonometer in healthy adults
    Karmiris, Efthymios
    Tsiripidis, Konstantinos
    Gartaganis, Panos S.
    Totou, Styliani
    Vasilopoulou, Maria-Giannoula
    Patelis, Andreas
    Giannakis, Ioannis
    Chalkiadaki, Evangelia
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 32 (02) : 951 - 959
  • [24] Comparative study of measurement of intraocular pressure in eyes with corneal opacity and normal cornea by Tonopen Avia, rebound tonometer (I-care), and noncontact tonometer
    Reddy, Sridhara
    Sharma, VijayK
    Moulick, Partha Sarathy
    Singh, Atul Kumar
    JOURNAL OF MARINE MEDICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 22 (02) : 207 - 211
  • [25] Red-free light for measurement of intraocular pressure using Goldmann applanation tonometer without fluorescein
    Ghoneim, Ehab M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 24 (01) : 84 - 87
  • [26] COMPARISON OF INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE MEASURED WITH GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER AND NON-CONTACT AIR-PUFF TONOMETER
    Mahsud, Hidayatullah
    Saleem, Muhammad Wali
    Muhammad, Rafiq
    Saleem, Muhammad
    Ayaz, Mirqad
    GOMAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 14 (02): : 63 - 66
  • [27] Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements obtained by icare pro tonometer, non-contact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in healthy individuals
    Duran, M.
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2023, 46 (10): : 1195 - 1203
  • [28] Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Icare PRO Rebound Tonometer, Tomey FT-1000 Noncontact Tonometer, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Healthy Subjects
    Guler, Mete
    Bilak, Semsettin
    Bilgin, Burak
    Simsek, Ali
    Capkin, Musa
    Reyhan, Ali Hakim
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2015, 24 (08) : 613 - 618
  • [29] Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements between Icare Pro Rebound Tonometer and Tono-Pen XL Tonometer in Supine and Lateral Decubitus Body Positions
    Lee, Tae-Eun
    Yoo, Chungkwon
    Hwang, Jin-Young
    Lin, Shan
    Kim, Yong Yeon
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2015, 40 (09) : 923 - 929
  • [30] Non-invasive determination of intraocular pressure in the rat eye. Comparison of an electronic tonometer (TonoPen), and a rebound (impact probe) tonometer
    David Goldblum
    Antti Kontiola
    Thom Mittag
    Bin Chen
    John Danias
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2002, 240 : 942 - 946