What makes better village economic development in traditional agricultural areas of China? Evidence from 338 villages

被引:78
作者
Qin, Xiaofei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Yurui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lu, Zhi [4 ]
Pan, Wei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Reg Sustainable Dev Modeling, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Victoria, Peter B Gustayson Sch Business, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Village economic development; Multi-dimensional factors; Boosted regression trees; Traditional agricultural areas; Rural revitalization; RURAL-DEVELOPMENT; LAND CONSOLIDATION; HENAN PROVINCE; LEVEL; INCOME; GROWTH; INDUSTRIALIZATION; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; INFRASTRUCTURE; URBANIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102286
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Villages are homes for most rural residents and powerhouses of the rural economy, with a vital role in reducing rural-urban disparity. It raises the need to explore the driving forces of village development, which in turn sheds light on strategies to secure rural revitalization. This research aims to dissect the factors contributing to village economic development through quantitative analysis of 338 villages in the traditional agricultural area of northern Jiangsu Province, China. This research leverages an integration of the econometric modeling and machine learning methodologies (multiple regression model and Boosted Regression Trees method) to ensure our findings' accuracy and comparativeness. This research finds: (1) village economic development depends more on the intensity of land-use than the absolute amount of farmland resources; (2) transportation infrastructure, labor outmigration, and land transfer are determinants of village economic development with increasing marginal effects; non-farm employment, entrepreneurship, and bottom-up partnership are also positively related to village economic development despite their non-linear effects. (3) Large-scale labor outmigration would brings a shortterm positive effect but poses a long-term challenge to village development. The authors suggest that priority should be given to the construction of transportation infrastructure, regulation of farmland transfer, industrial integration, promotion of rural entrepreneurship, and land consolidation to achieve sustainable development of the village economy.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
2017 Mohurd, 2017, STAT YB URB RUR CONS
[2]   Do rural roads create pathways out of poverty? Evidence from India [J].
Aggarwal, Shilpa .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2018, 133 :375-395
[3]  
Alsos GA, 2011, HANDBOOK OF RESEARCH ON ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, P1
[4]   IS PUBLIC-EXPENDITURE PRODUCTIVE [J].
ASCHAUER, DA .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 1989, 23 (02) :177-200
[5]  
Ashley C., 2001, Development Policy Review, V19, P395, DOI 10.1111/1467-7679.00141
[6]   Local capacity, village governance, and the political economy of rural development in Indonesia [J].
Bebbington, Anthony ;
Dharmawan, Leni ;
Fahmi, Erwin ;
Guggenheim, Scott .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 34 (11) :1958-1976
[7]  
Breiman L, 1984, Classification and Regression Trees, V1st, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781315139470
[8]   Aligning Inner Peripheries with rural development in Italy: Territorial evidence to support policy contextualization [J].
De Toni, Andrea ;
Vizzarri, Matteo ;
Di Febbraro, Mirko ;
Lasserre, Bruno ;
Noguera, Joan ;
Di Martino, Paolo .
LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 100
[9]  
De'ath G, 2007, ECOLOGY, V88, P243, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[243:BTFEMA]2.0.CO
[10]  
2