Tightness of the maximum likelihood semidefinite relaxation for angular synchronization

被引:82
作者
Bandeira, Afonso S. [1 ]
Boumal, Nicolas [2 ]
Singer, Amit [2 ]
机构
[1] NYU, New York, NY USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
关键词
Angular synchronization; Semidefinite programming; Tightness of convex relaxation; Maximum likelihood estimation; COMPLEX QUADRATIC OPTIMIZATION; APPROXIMATION ALGORITHMS; RANK; PROGRAMS; RECONSTRUCTION; EIGENVECTORS; RECOVERY; MATRICES; GEOMETRY;
D O I
10.1007/s10107-016-1059-6
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Maximum likelihood estimation problems are, in general, intractable optimization problems. As a result, it is common to approximate the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) using convex relaxations. In some cases, the relaxation is tight: it recovers the true MLE. Most tightness proofs only apply to situations where the MLE exactly recovers a planted solution (known to the analyst). It is then sufficient to establish that the optimality conditions hold at the planted signal. In this paper, we study an estimation problem (angular synchronization) for which the MLE is not a simple function of the planted solution, yet for which the convex relaxation is tight. To establish tightness in this context, the proof is less direct because the point at which to verify optimality conditions is not known explicitly. Angular synchronization consists in estimating a collection of n phases, given noisy measurements of the pairwise relative phases. The MLE for angular synchronization is the solution of a (hard) non-bipartite Grothendieck problem over the complex numbers. We consider a stochastic model for the data: a planted signal (that is, a ground truth set of phases) is corrupted with non-adversarial random noise. Even though the MLE does not coincide with the planted signal, we show that the classical semidefinite relaxation for it is tight, with high probability. This holds even for high levels of noise.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 167
页数:23
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Exact Recovery in the Stochastic Block Model [J].
Abbe, Emmanuel ;
Bandeira, Afonso S. ;
Hall, Georgina .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 2016, 62 (01) :471-487
[2]  
Absil PA, 2008, OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHMS ON MATRIX MANIFOLDS, P1
[3]  
Agrawal A, 2006, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3951, P578
[4]   Phase Retrieval with Polarization [J].
Alexeev, Boris ;
Bandeira, Afonso S. ;
Fickus, Matthew ;
Mixon, Dustin G. .
SIAM JOURNAL ON IMAGING SCIENCES, 2014, 7 (01) :35-66
[5]   Complementarity and nondegeneracy in semidefinite programming [J].
Alizadeh, F ;
Haeberly, JPA ;
Overton, ML .
MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 1997, 77 (02) :111-128
[6]   Living on the edge: phase transitions in convex programs with random data [J].
Amelunxen, Dennis ;
Lotz, Martin ;
McCoy, Michael B. ;
Tropp, Joel A. .
INFORMATION AND INFERENCE-A JOURNAL OF THE IMA, 2014, 3 (03) :224-294
[7]   Guaranteed clustering and biclustering via semidefinite programming [J].
Ames, Brendan P. W. .
MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 2014, 147 (1-2) :429-465
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2014, 5 C INN THEOR COMP S
[9]  
[Anonymous], IEEE T NETW SCI
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ARXIV13076864