Australian rangeland futures: time now for systemic responses to interconnected challenges

被引:27
作者
Foran, Barney [1 ]
Smith, Mark Stafford [2 ]
Burnside, Don [3 ]
Andrew, Martin [4 ]
Blesing, Don [5 ]
Forrest, Kate [6 ]
Taylor, John [7 ]
机构
[1] Charles Sturt Univ, Inst Land Water & Soc, POB 789, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia
[2] CSIRO Land & Water, POB 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[3] DG Burnside & Associates, 29 Woodsome St, Mt Lawley, WA 6050, Australia
[4] Martin Andrew Solut, 132 Kensington Rd, Toorak Gardens, SA 5065, Australia
[5] Agrivis Advisory, POB 149, Kent, SA 5067, Australia
[6] Rangeland NRM Alliance, 92 Galah St, Longreach, Qld 4730, Australia
[7] Rangelands Australia, 37 Pioneer Crescent, Bellbowrie, Qld 4070, Australia
关键词
governance; human capacity; Indigenous; livelihoods; remoteness; sustainability; CLIMATE-CHANGE; COMMUNITIES; MANAGEMENT; FREQUENCY; CAPACITY; INDUSTRY; COVER; DAMS;
D O I
10.1071/RJ18105
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Australia's rangelands contain wildlands, relatively intact biodiversity, widespread Indigenous cultures, pastoral and mining industries all set in past and present events and mythologies. The nature of risks and threats to these rangelands is increasingly global and systemic. Future policy frameworks must acknowledge this and act accordingly. We collate current key information on land tenures and land uses, people and domestic livestock in Australian rangelands, and discuss five perspectives on how the rangelands are changing that should inform the development of integrated policy: climate and environmental change, the southern rangelands, the northern rangelands, Indigenous Australia, and governance and management. From these perspectives we argue that more attention must be paid to: ensuring a social licence to operate across a range of uses, acknowledging and supporting a younger, more Indigenous population, implementing positive aspects of technological innovation, halting capital and governance leakages, and building human capacity. A recommended set of systemic responses should therefore (i) address governance issues consistently and comprehensively, (ii) ensure that new technologies can foster the delivery of sustainable livelihoods, and (iii) focus capacity building on a community of industries where knowledge is built for the long-term, and do all three of these with an eye to the changing demographics of the rangelands.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 292
页数:22
相关论文
共 107 条
[91]  
Sparrow B., 2017, P AUSTR RANG SOC 19
[92]  
Stafford SmithM., 2009, The Heartland: Voices from Central Australia: Part 1, V28, P8
[93]   A NEW DRYLAND DEVELOPMENT PARADIGM GROUNDED IN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF DRYLAND SYSTEMS SCIENCE [J].
Stringer, Lindsay C. ;
Reed, Mark S. ;
Fleskens, Luuk ;
Thomas, Richard J. ;
Le, Quang Bao ;
Lala-Pritchard, Tana .
LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 28 (07) :1952-1961
[94]  
Taylor J. A., 2012, RANGELANDS, V34, P21, DOI 10.2111/1551-501X-34.3.21
[95]  
Tourism Australia, 2016, REC ACT PLAN 2014 20
[96]  
URS Australia Pty Ltd, 2004, FIN EV GASC MU UNPUB
[97]  
URS Australia Pty Ltd, 2015, WEST 2000 PLUS UNPUB
[98]  
URS Australia Pty Ltd, 2013, SUST LAND US E UNPUB
[99]  
URS Australia Pty Ltd, 2001, WEST 2000 RUR UNPUB
[100]  
Walker BW., 2012, Fixing the Hole in Australia's Heartland: How Government needs to work in remote Australia, Remote Focus, Desert Knowledge Australia