Application of multicriteria decision analysis in health care: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis

被引:127
作者
Adunlin, Georges [1 ]
Diaby, Vakaramoko [1 ]
Xiao, Hong [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida A&M Univ, Coll Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, Div Econ Social & Adm Pharm, Tallahassee, FL 32307 USA
关键词
analytic hierarchy process; bibliometric analysis; decision making; health care; multi-criteria decision analysis; systematic review; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT; INTERVENTIONS;
D O I
10.1111/hex.12287
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) in health care has become common. However, the literature lacks systematic review trend analysis on the application of MCDA in health care. Aim To systematically identify applications of MCDA to the areas of health care, and to report on publication trends. Methods English language studies published from January 1, 1980 until October 1, 2013 were included. Electronic databases searches were supplemented by searching conference proceedings and relevant journals. Studies considered for inclusion were those using MCDA techniques within the areas of health care, and involving the participation of decision makers. A bibliometric analysis was undertaken to present the publication trends. Results A total of 66 citations met the inclusion criteria. An increase in publication trend occurred in the years 1990, 1997, 1999, 2005, 2008, and 2012. For the remaining years, the publication trend was either steady or declining. The trend shows that the number of publications reached its highest peak in 2012 (n = 9). Medical Decision Making was the dominant with the highest number published papers (n = 7). The majority of the studies were conducted in the US (n = 29). Medical Decision Making journal published the highest number of articles (n = 7). Analytic Hierarchy Process (n = 33) was the most used MCDA technique. Cancer was the most researched disease topic (n = 12). The most covered area of application was diagnosis and treatment (n = 26). Conclusion The review shows that MCDA has been applied to a broad range of areas in the health care, with the use of a variety of methodological approaches. Further research is needed to develop practice guidelines for the appropriate application and reporting of MCDA methods.
引用
收藏
页码:1894 / 1905
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], WEBC MULT DEC AN TEC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Methods for multiple attribute decision making, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-48318-93
[3]   Priority setting of health interventions: The need for multi-criteria decision analysis [J].
Baltussen R. ;
Niessen L. .
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 4 (1)
[4]   Decision-making in energy planning. Application of the Electre method at regional level for the diffusion of renewable energy technology [J].
Beccali, M ;
Cellura, M ;
Mistretta, M .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2003, 28 (13) :2063-2087
[5]  
Belton V., 2002, MULIPLE CRITERIA DEC
[6]   FUZZY-PROGRAMMING APPROACH TO MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING TRANSPORTATION PROBLEM [J].
BIT, AK ;
BISWAL, MP ;
ALAM, SS .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1992, 50 (02) :135-141
[7]   Integrating patients' views into health technology assessment: Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) as a method to elicit patient preferences [J].
Danner, Marion ;
Hummel, J. Marjan ;
Volz, Fabian ;
van Manen, Jeannette G. ;
Wiegard, Beate ;
Dintsios, Charalabos-Markos ;
Bastian, Hilda ;
Gerber, Andreas ;
IJzerman, Maarten J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2011, 27 (04) :369-375
[8]   Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) in health care: A bibliometric analysis [J].
Diaby, Vakaramoko ;
Campbell, Kaitryn ;
Goeree, Ron .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH FOR HEALTH CARE, 2013, 2 (1-2) :20-24
[9]  
Dodgson J., 2009, MULTICRITERIA ANAL M
[10]   Multi-Criteria Clinical Decision Support A Primer on the Use of Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Methods to Promote Evidence-Based, Patient-Centered Healthcare [J].
Dolan, James G. .
PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2010, 3 (04) :229-248