Success and Complications of Salpingectomy at the Time of Vaginal Hysterectomy

被引:47
作者
Robert, Magali [1 ]
Cenaiko, David [2 ]
Sepandj, Jasmine [3 ]
Iwanicki, Stanislaw [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Cummings Sch Med, Sect Pelv Med, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Cummings Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Dept Kinesiol, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
关键词
Surgical outcome; Vaginal salpingectomy; PROPHYLACTIC SALPINGECTOMY; OVARIAN RESERVE; OOPHORECTOMY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2015.04.012
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Study Objectives: To document the success rates and complications of salpingectomy performed at the time of vaginal hysterectomy to possibly reduce ovarian cancer rates. Design: Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force Classification II-2). Setting: Community-based hospital with university affiliation in Calgary, Canada. Intervention: All women undergoing hysterectomy for benign conditions were offered preferentially a vaginal approach with prophylactic salpingectomy. Measurements and Main Results: During the study period (October 2011 to January 2014), a total of 425 vaginal hysterectomies were performed. The overall success rate of salpingectomy was 88%. Pelvic adhesions significantly predicted the ability to perform salpingectomies (odds ratio, 6.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.8-14.3; p < .001). Age also was predictive of outcomes (p = .007), with increasing age predicting decrease success. The overall postoperative complication rate was 15%, with 3.8% possibly attributable to salpingectomy (i.e., intrapelvic complications). No associated factors were found on regression analysis. Conclusion: Salpingectomy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy is a feasible procedure. Complication rates are low. Only pelvic adhesions are associated with failure to complete a salpingectomy. (C) 2015 AAGL. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:864 / 869
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
ACOG Committee Opinion, CHOOS ROUT HYST BEN
[2]  
[Anonymous], SEER stat fact sheets
[3]   Salpingectomy, why not? [J].
Backes, Floor J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 210 (05) :385-386
[4]  
Baden W F, 1972, Clin Obstet Gynecol, V15, P1048, DOI 10.1097/00003081-197212000-00020
[5]   The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction [J].
Bump, RC ;
Mattiasson, A ;
Bo, K ;
Brubaker, LP ;
DeLancey, JOL ;
Klarskov, P ;
Shull, BL ;
Smith, ARB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (01) :10-17
[6]   Prophylactic adnexectomy along with vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology [J].
Cho, Hye-yon ;
Kang, Sung-won ;
Kim, Hong-bae ;
Park, Sung-ho ;
Park, Sung Taek .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2012, 286 (05) :1221-1225
[7]   Factors affecting the feasibility of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy during vaginal hysterectomy for uterine prolapse [J].
Dain, Lena ;
Abramov, Yoram .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 51 (04) :307-309
[8]   Endosalpingiosis as it relates to tubal, ovarian and serous neoplastic tissues: An immunohistochemical study of tubal and Mullerian antigens [J].
Esselen, Katharine M. ;
Ng, Shu-Kay ;
Hua, Yuanyuan ;
White, Miranda ;
Jimenez, Cynthia A. ;
Welch, William R. ;
Drapkin, Ronny ;
Berkowitz, Ross S. ;
Ng, Shu-Wing .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 132 (02) :316-321
[9]   Short-term effects of salpingectomy during laparoscopic hysterectomy on ovarian reserve: a pilot randomized controlled trial [J].
Findley, Austin D. ;
Siedhoff, Matthew T. ;
Hobbs, Kumari A. ;
Steege, John F. ;
Carey, Erin T. ;
McCall, Christina A. ;
Steiner, Anne Z. .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (06) :1704-1708
[10]   Prophylactic Salpingectomy: Does It Make the Cut? [J].
Frishman, Gary N. .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 20 (04) :404-405