Comparison of Risk Models in the Prediction of 30-Day Mortality in Acute Myocardial Infarction-Associated Cardiogenic Shock

被引:6
作者
Ranard, Lauren S. [1 ]
Guber, Kenneth [2 ]
Fried, Justin [1 ]
Takeda, Koji [1 ]
Kaku, Yuji [1 ]
Karmpaliotis, Dimitrios [1 ,3 ]
Sayer, Gabriel [1 ]
Rabbani, Leroy [1 ]
Burkhoff, Daniel [4 ]
Uriel, Nir [1 ]
Kirtane, Ajay J. [1 ,4 ]
Masoumi, Amirali [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Cardiol, Irving Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Med, Irving Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[3] Morristown Med Ctr, Gagnon Cardiovasc Inst, Morristown, NJ USA
[4] Cardiovasc Res Fdn, New York, NY USA
来源
STRUCTURAL HEART-THE JOURNAL OF THE HEART TEAM | 2022年 / 6卷 / 06期
关键词
Acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock; Cardiogenic shock; Mortality; Risk prediction; Risk calculator; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; APACHE-II; ACUTE PHYSIOLOGY; SAPS-II; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; SCORE; SEVERITY; OUTCOMES; REVASCULARIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.shj.2022.100116
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: There are numerous risk-prediction models applied to acute myocardial infarction-related cardio-genic shock (AMI-CS) patients to determine a more accurate prognosis and to assist in patient triage. There is wide heterogeneity among the risk models including the nature of predictors evaluated and their specific outcome measures. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the performance of 20 risk-prediction models in AMI-CS patients. Methods: Patients included in our analysis were admitted to a tertiary care cardiac intensive care unit with AMI-CS. Twenty risk-prediction models were computed utilizing vitals assessments, laboratory investigations, hemo-dynamic markers, and vasopressor, inotropic and mechanical circulatory support available from within the first 24 hours of presentation. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess the prediction of 30-day mortality. Calibration was assessed with a Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Results: Seventy patients (median age 63 years, 67% male) were admitted between 2017 and 2021. The models' area under the curve (AUC) ranged from 0.49 to 0.79, with the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II score having the most optimal discrimination of 30-day mortality (AUC: 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.67-0.90), fol-lowed by the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-III score (AUC: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.59-0.84) and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II score (AUC: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.55-0.80). All 20 risk scores demonstrated adequate calibration (p > 0.05 for all). Conclusions: Among the models tested in a data set of patients admitted with AMI-CS, the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II risk score model demonstrated the highest prognostic accuracy. Further investigations are required to improve the discriminative capabilities of these models or to establish new, more streamlined and accurate methods for mortality prognostication in AMI-CS.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Modified shock index: A bedside clinical index for risk assessment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction at presentation [J].
Abreu, Gloria ;
Azevedo, Pedro ;
Braga, Carlos Galvao ;
Vieira, Catarina ;
Pereira, Miguel Alvares ;
Martins, Juliana ;
Arantes, Carina ;
Rodrigues, Catarina ;
Salgado, Alberto ;
Marques, Jorge .
REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2018, 37 (06) :481-488
[2]   Predictors of Outcomes in Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock [J].
Acharya, Deepak .
CARDIOLOGY IN REVIEW, 2018, 26 (05) :255-266
[3]   Predicting, mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PAMI risk score) [J].
Addala, S ;
Grines, CL ;
Dixon, SR ;
Stone, GW ;
Boura, JA ;
Ochoa, AB ;
Pellizzon, G ;
O'Neill, WW ;
Kahn, JK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 93 (05) :629-632
[4]   Trends in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction [J].
Aissaoui, Nadia ;
Puymirat, Etienne ;
Delmas, Clement ;
Ortuno, Sofia ;
Durand, Eric ;
Bataille, Vincent ;
Drouet, Elodie ;
Bonello, Laurent ;
Bonnefoy-Cudraz, Eric ;
Lesmeles, Gilles ;
Guerot, Emmanuel ;
Schiele, Francois ;
Simon, Tabassome ;
Danchin, Nicolas .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2020, 22 (04) :664-672
[5]   The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI - A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making [J].
Antman, EM ;
Cohen, M ;
Bernink, PJLM ;
McCabe, CH ;
Horacek, T ;
Papuchis, G ;
Mautner, B ;
Corbalan, R ;
Radley, D ;
Braunwald, E .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 284 (07) :835-842
[6]   Trends in management and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock [J].
Babaev, A ;
Frederick, PD ;
Pasta, DJ ;
Every, N ;
Sichrovsky, T ;
Hochman, JS .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (04) :448-454
[7]   Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative [J].
Basir, Mir B. ;
Schreiber, Theodore ;
Dixon, Simon ;
Alaswad, Khaldoon ;
Patel, Kirit ;
Almany, Steven ;
Khandelwal, Akshay ;
Hanson, Ivan ;
George, Augustine ;
Ashbrook, Michael ;
Blank, Nimrod ;
Abdelsalam, Murad ;
Sareen, Nishtha ;
Timmis, Steven B. H. ;
O'Neill, William W. .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2018, 91 (03) :454-461
[8]   Evolving Concepts in Diagnosis and Management of Cardiogenic Shock [J].
Bellumkonda, Lavanya ;
Gul, Burcu ;
Masri, Sofia Carolina .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 122 (06) :1104-1110
[9]  
BOHNEN JMA, 1994, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V129, P33
[10]  
Botelho Anabela, J ANXIETY DISORD, V70, P896, DOI [10.1016/j.palaeo.2011.11.006, DOI 10.1016/J.AEI.2010.04.001, 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.271, DOI 10.1016/J.JANXDIS.2003.09.004]