A systematic review of factors related to first-year students' success in Dutch and Flemish higher education

被引:0
作者
van Rooij, E. [1 ]
Brouwer, J. [2 ]
Fokkens-Bruinsma, M. [1 ]
Jansen, E. [1 ]
Donche, V. [3 ]
Noyens, D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Fac Behav & Social Sci, Res Div Higher Educ, Dept Teacher Educ, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Fac Behav & Social Sci, Dept Educ Sci, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Antwerp, Fac Social Sci, Dept Training & Educ Sci, Antwerp, Belgium
来源
PEDAGOGISCHE STUDIEN | 2017年 / 94卷 / 05期
关键词
review; academic achievement; persistence; first-year students; higher education; ACADEMIC-PERFORMANCE; UNIVERSITY-EDUCATION; LEARNING-STRATEGIES; SECONDARY-SCHOOL; ETHNIC-MINORITY; 1ST YEAR; MOTIVATION; ACHIEVEMENT; PERSONALITY; MODEL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This systematic review presents an overview of factors which play an important role in explaining first-year grade point average (GPA), the number of obtained credits (EC), and persistence in Dutch and Flemish higher education. Thirty-nine peer-reviewed articles were included, mostly Dutch studies using samples of university students. We found that ability factors, prior education characteristics, learning environment characteristics and behavioural engagement indicators were most successful in explaining success. While prior education and behavioural engagement were related to GPA, EC and persistence, the results differed depending on which outcome variable was used in the other predictor categories. Ability and learning environment mattered most as GPA and EC predictors. Personality characteristics, motivational factors, and learning strategies were mainly important for GPA. Demographic factors mattered most for EC, and psychosocial factors for EC and persistence. Recommendations for future research are provided based on this review's results.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 405
页数:46
相关论文
共 116 条
[21]  
CARROLL JB, 1963, TEACH COLL REC, V64, P723
[22]  
Christenson S., 2012, Check Connect: A comprehensive student engagment intervention
[23]   Mediating relationships between academic motivation, academic integration and academic performance [J].
Clark, M. H. ;
Middleton, Steven C. ;
Nguyen, Daniel ;
Zwick, Lauren K. .
LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2014, 33 :30-38
[24]   Aptitude is not enough: How personality and behavior predict academic performance [J].
Conard, MA .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2006, 40 (03) :339-346
[25]   Why Are Men Failing Behind? Gender Gaps in College Performance and Persistence [J].
Conger, Dylan ;
Long, Mark C. .
ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2010, 627 :184-214
[26]   Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An integrative review [J].
Covington, MV .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 51 :171-200
[27]   A meta-analytic review of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire [J].
Crede, Marcus ;
Phillips, L. Alison .
LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2011, 21 (04) :337-346
[28]  
Davidson N., 2014, J EXCELLENCE COLL TE, V25, P1
[29]   Unraveling the impact of the Big Five personality traits on academic performance: The moderating and mediating effects of self-efficacy and academic motivation [J].
De Feyter, Tim ;
Caers, Ralf ;
Vigna, Claudia ;
Berings, Dries .
LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2012, 22 (04) :439-448
[30]  
De Jong T., 2006, Handbook of educational psychology, V2nd, P739