Clinical evaluation of a new correction Check for updatem algorithm for dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer tonometry before and after laser in situ keratomileusis and small-incision lenticule extraction

被引:20
作者
Chen, Kai-Jung [1 ]
Joda, Akram [1 ,5 ]
Vinciguerra, Riccardo [2 ]
Eliasy, Ashkan [1 ]
Sefat, Shervin Mir Mohi [6 ]
Kook, Daniel [6 ,7 ]
Geraghty, Brendan [1 ]
Roberts, Cynthia J. [8 ]
Elsheikh, Ahmed [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Sch Engn, Liverpool L69 3GH, Merseyside, England
[2] Royal Liverpool & Broadgreen Univ Hosp, St Pauls Eye Unit, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Moorfields Eye Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, NIHR Biomed Res Ctr Ophthalmol, London, England
[4] UCL Inst Ophthalmol, London, England
[5] King Faisal Univ, Coll Engn, Al Hasa, Saudi Arabia
[6] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Smile Eye Clin, Munich, Germany
[7] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Ophthalmol, Munich, Germany
[8] Ohio State Univ, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Dept Biomed Engn, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETRY; CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS; TRUE INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE; FEMTOSECOND LASER; BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES; NONCONTACT TONOMETRY; CONTOUR TONOMETRY; FLAP CREATION; FOLLOW-UP; LASIK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.01.023
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare a biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) algorithm provided by the dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer (Corvis ST) with Goldmann applanation tonometry IOP (Goldmann IOP) and standard dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer IOP measurements before and after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and refractive lenticule extraction small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgeries. Setting: Smile Eye Clinic, Munich, Germany, and University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom. Design: Retrospective case series. Methods: Patients scheduled for LASIK and patients scheduled for small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia or myopic astigmatism were included. The preoperative and postoperative evaluations included Goldmann, Scheimpflug tomography, and dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer IOP measurements. Results: The study comprised 14 patients in the LASIK group and 22 patients in the small-incision lenticule extraction group. Preoperative Goldmann IOP and Scheimpflug analyzer IOP values showed significant positive correlation with central corneal thickness (CCT) (P = .05 for LASIK; P = .003 for small-incision lenticule extraction). No significant correlation was found between bIOP and CCT (P > .05). After both surgeries, there were significant decreases in Goldmann IOP (-3.2 mm Hg 3.4 [SD] and -3.2 +/- 2.1 mm Hg, respectively; both P < .001) and Scheimpflug analyzer IOP (-3.7 +/- 2.1 mm Hg and -3.3 +/- 2.0 mm Hg, respectively, both P < .001) compared with preoperative readings, whereas bIOP did not differ significantly (0.1 +/- 2.1 mm Hg and 0.8 +/- 1.8 mm Hg, respectively; P = .80 and P = .273, respectively). Conclusions: The bIOP readings before and after LASIK and small-incision lenticule extraction were neither significantly different nor correlated with CCT. In contrast, both Goldmann IOP and Scheimpflug analyzer IOP had significant reductions postoperatively and showed significant correlation with CCT preoperatively. (C) 2018 ASCRS and ESCRS
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 588
页数:8
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Ten-year follow-up of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia of up to-10 diopters [J].
Alio, Jorge L. ;
Muftuoglu, Orkun ;
Ortiz, Dolores ;
Perez-Santonja, Juan Jose ;
Artola, Alberto ;
Ayala, Maria Jose ;
Garcia, Maria Jose ;
De Luna, Gracia Castro .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 145 (01) :46-54
[2]   The effect of repeated applanation on subsequent IOP measurements [J].
AlMubrad, Turki M. ;
Ogbuehi, Kelechi C. .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2008, 91 (06) :524-529
[3]   Dynamic ultra high speed Scheimpflug imaging for assessing corneal biomechanical properties [J].
Ambrosio, Renato, Jr. ;
Ramos, Isaac ;
Luz, Allan ;
Faria, Fernando Correa ;
Steinmueller, Andreas ;
Krug, Matthias ;
Belin, Michael W. ;
Roberts, Cynthia Jane .
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE OFTALMOLOGIA, 2013, 72 (02) :99-102
[4]   Clinical Evaluation of Methods to Correct Intraocular Pressure Measurements by the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Ocular Response Analyzer, and Corvis ST Tonometer for the Effects of Corneal Stiffness Parameters [J].
Bao, FangJun ;
Huang, ZiXu ;
Huang, JinHai ;
Wang, JunJie ;
Deng, ManLi ;
Li, LinNa ;
Yu, AYong ;
Wang, QinMei ;
Elsheikh, Ahmed .
JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2016, 25 (06) :510-519
[5]   Central corneal thickness - Tonometry artifact, or something more? [J].
Brandt, James D. .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 114 (11) :1963-1964
[6]   Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes [J].
Ceruti, P. ;
Morbio, R. ;
Marraffa, M. ;
Marchini, G. .
EYE, 2009, 23 (02) :262-269
[7]   Change in Intraocular pressure measurements after LASIK - The effect of the refractive correction and the lamellar flap [J].
Chang, DH ;
Stulting, RD .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 112 (06) :1009-1016
[8]   Assessment of true intraocular pressure: The gap between theory and practical data [J].
Chihara, Etsuo .
SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 53 (03) :203-218
[9]   The influence of cornea properties on rebound tonometry [J].
Chui, Wan-sang ;
Lam, Andrew ;
Chen, Davie ;
Chiu, Roger .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 115 (01) :80-84
[10]   Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser LASIK: comparison of corneal wound healing and inflammation [J].
Dong, Zixian ;
Zhou, Xingtao ;
Wu, Jihong ;
Zhang, Zhehuan ;
Li, Tao ;
Zhou, Zimei ;
Zhang, Shenghai ;
Li, Gang .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 98 (02) :263-269