Autonomy, practical rationality and being at one with oneself: a reply to Wendelborn

被引：1

作者：

Hand, Michael ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Educ, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England

来源：

OXFORD REVIEW OF EDUCATION | 2020年 / 46卷 / 06期

关键词：

Educational aims; autonomy; heteronomy; practical rationality; legitimate authority;

D O I：

10.1080/03054985.2020.1842185

中图分类号：

G40 [教育学];

学科分类号：

040101 ; 120403 ;

摘要：

In his belated reply to my 2006 article 'Against autonomy as an educational aim', Christian Wendelborn advances two objections to my argument and proposes two new candidates for an educational aim deserving of the name autonomy. I show here that his objections miss their mark and that neither of his new candidates is appointable.

引用

页码：672 / 677

页数：6

共 5 条

[1] Frankfurt Harry G., 1988, IMPORTANCE WHAT WE C, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511818172
[2] Against autonomy as an educational aim
Hand, Michael
[J]. OXFORD REVIEW OF EDUCATION, 2006, 32 (04) : 535 - 550
[3] Kripke S., 1977, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, V2, P255, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1475-4975.1977.TB00045.X, 10.1111/j.1475-4975.1977.tb00045.x]
[4] Against Michael Hand'sAgainst Autonomy as An Educational Aim
Wendelborn, Christian
[J]. OXFORD REVIEW OF EDUCATION, 2020, 46 (06) : 661 - 671
[5] WILSON J., 1977, PHILOS PRACTICAL ED

← 1 →