Funnel usefulness in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction using periareolar incision with prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with acellular dermal matrix

被引:6
作者
Woo, Joohyun [1 ,2 ]
Seung, Ik Hyun [3 ]
Hong, Seung Eun [3 ]
机构
[1] Ewha Womans Univ, Dept Surg, Mokdong Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Ewha Womans Univ, Ewha Canc Ctr Women, Mokdong Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Ewha Womans Univ, Coll Med, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 1071 Anyangcheon Ro, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Acellular dermal matrix; Breast reconstruction; Funnel; Silicone implant; Periareolar incision; Prepectoral reconstruction; NIPPLE-SPARING MASTECTOMY; CAPSULAR CONTRACTURE; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; PATIENT; SATISFACTION; INSERTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2020.08.078
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The funnel has been used in esthetic breast surgery that requires a small incision. Recent advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques have led to more cases of nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) through periareolar incision. However, prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is almost impossible with the periareolar approach. Funnels can also be useful for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. Methods: NSM with periareolar incision and direct-to-implant breast reconstruction were performed with prepectoral implant placement between January 2017 and July 2019. The ADM full-wrapped anatomic textured implant was inserted using a funnel without additional incisions during surgery. Results: A total of 21 patients were enrolled, including 2 who received bilateral breast reconstruction. All operations were successfully performed using funnels with minimal periareolar incisions. Anatomic textured implants (mean: 251.7 cc, range: 90-450 cc) wrapped in ADM can be effectively inserted in the prepectoral plane using a funnel. Two patients experienced delayed wound healing of the areola that was treated by conservative wound management. Patients also experienced less pain overall, and the cosmetic result was very good. Patient satisfaction scores were also very high. Conclusions: While the periareolar incision is esthetically pleasing, additional resection is often necessary. However, the use of funnels ensured that no additional incision was needed even in large implants. This subsequently led to better results in terms of pain and scarring. Prepectoral breast reconstruction involving complete implant coverage with ADM using a funnel through the periareolar approach represents a good alternative to the traditional dual plane subpectoral method. This method provides good patient satisfaction without adverse outcomes. (C) 2020 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2016 / 2024
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Complication Rate of Prepectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Using Human Acellular Dermal Matrices
    Mangialardi, Maria Lucia
    Salgarello, Marzia
    Cacciatore, Pasquale
    Baldelli, Ilaria
    Raposio, Edoardo
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2020, 8 (12) : E3235
  • [32] A Comparative Analysis between Subpectoral versus Prepectoral Single Stage Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction
    Kim, Jeong-Hoon
    Hong, Seung Eun
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2020, 56 (10): : 1 - 10
  • [33] Dose the Omission of Cefazolin in Irrigation Solution Affect Outcomes in Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction?
    Lee, Jong-Koo
    Chung, Ji Eun
    Pyon, Jai Kyong
    Lee, Kyeong-Tae
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, : 1963 - 1972
  • [34] Outcomes of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with Braxon® acellular dermal matrix-a single-centre experience
    Chandarana, Mihir
    Soumian, Soni
    Jafferbhoy, Sadaf
    Marla, Sekhar
    Narayanan, Sankaran
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2019, 42 (05) : 431 - 438
  • [35] Evidence for the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Gravina, Paula R.
    Pettit, Rowland W.
    Davis, Matthew J.
    Winocour, Sebastian J.
    Selber, Jesse C.
    SEMINARS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2019, 33 (04) : 229 - 235
  • [36] Cost Analysis of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction With Acellular Dermal Matrix
    de Blacam, Catherine
    Momoh, Adeyiza O.
    Colakoglu, Salih
    Slavin, Sumner A.
    Tobias, Adam M.
    Lee, Bernard T.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2012, 69 (05) : 516 - 520
  • [37] Explantation in Tissue Expander and Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix: How to Avoid Early Reconstructive Failures
    Cohen, Leslie E.
    Bogue, Jarrod T.
    Jin, Julia
    Disa, Joseph J.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 147 (04) : 579E - 586E
  • [38] Multicentre study of prepectoral breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix
    Chandarana, M.
    Harries, S.
    Tenovici, A.
    Mortimer, C.
    Clarke, D.
    Banerjee, D.
    Thekkinkattil, D.
    Predolac, D.
    Ferguson, D.
    Vaughan-Williams, E.
    Osborne, G.
    Mitchell, G.
    Azmy, I
    Jones, L.
    Roche, N.
    Bhaskar, P.
    Achuthan, R.
    Rathinaezhil, R.
    Parmeshwar, R.
    Narayanan, S.
    Seetharam, S.
    Marla, S.
    Soumian, S.
    Sircar, T.
    BJS OPEN, 2020, 4 (01): : 71 - 77
  • [39] Improving Cost-efficiency in Bilateral Direct-to-Implant Reconstructions with Acellular Dermal Matrix
    Buendia, Javier
    Olivas-Menayo, Jesus
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2019, 7 (09)
  • [40] Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Safety Outcome Endpoints and Delineation of Risk Factors
    Nealon, Kassandra P.
    Weitzman, Rachel E.
    Sobti, Nikhil
    Gadd, Michele
    Specht, Michelle
    Jimenez, Rachel B.
    Ehrlichman, Richard
    Faulkner, Heather R.
    Austen, William G., Jr.
    Liao, Eric C.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 145 (05) : E898 - E908