Funnel usefulness in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction using periareolar incision with prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with acellular dermal matrix

被引:6
作者
Woo, Joohyun [1 ,2 ]
Seung, Ik Hyun [3 ]
Hong, Seung Eun [3 ]
机构
[1] Ewha Womans Univ, Dept Surg, Mokdong Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Ewha Womans Univ, Ewha Canc Ctr Women, Mokdong Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Ewha Womans Univ, Coll Med, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 1071 Anyangcheon Ro, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Acellular dermal matrix; Breast reconstruction; Funnel; Silicone implant; Periareolar incision; Prepectoral reconstruction; NIPPLE-SPARING MASTECTOMY; CAPSULAR CONTRACTURE; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; PATIENT; SATISFACTION; INSERTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2020.08.078
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The funnel has been used in esthetic breast surgery that requires a small incision. Recent advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques have led to more cases of nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) through periareolar incision. However, prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is almost impossible with the periareolar approach. Funnels can also be useful for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. Methods: NSM with periareolar incision and direct-to-implant breast reconstruction were performed with prepectoral implant placement between January 2017 and July 2019. The ADM full-wrapped anatomic textured implant was inserted using a funnel without additional incisions during surgery. Results: A total of 21 patients were enrolled, including 2 who received bilateral breast reconstruction. All operations were successfully performed using funnels with minimal periareolar incisions. Anatomic textured implants (mean: 251.7 cc, range: 90-450 cc) wrapped in ADM can be effectively inserted in the prepectoral plane using a funnel. Two patients experienced delayed wound healing of the areola that was treated by conservative wound management. Patients also experienced less pain overall, and the cosmetic result was very good. Patient satisfaction scores were also very high. Conclusions: While the periareolar incision is esthetically pleasing, additional resection is often necessary. However, the use of funnels ensured that no additional incision was needed even in large implants. This subsequently led to better results in terms of pain and scarring. Prepectoral breast reconstruction involving complete implant coverage with ADM using a funnel through the periareolar approach represents a good alternative to the traditional dual plane subpectoral method. This method provides good patient satisfaction without adverse outcomes. (C) 2020 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2016 / 2024
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Utility of a Lateral Adipodermal Flap in Prepectoral Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction
    Schwartz, Jean-Claude D.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2023, 11 (03) : E4881
  • [22] Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Outcomes
    Safran, Tyler
    Al-Halabi, Becher
    Viezel-Mathieu, Alex
    Hazan, Jessica
    Dionisopoulos, Tassos
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 148 (06) : 882E - 890E
  • [23] Prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with complete ADM or synthetic mesh coverage-36-Months follow-up in 200 reconstructed breasts
    Reitsamer, Roland
    Peintinger, Florentia
    Klaassen-Federspiel, Frederike
    Sir, Andreas
    BREAST, 2019, 48 : 32 - 37
  • [24] Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant versus Staged Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison of Complications
    Finkelstein, Emily R.
    Laureano, Natalia Vidal
    Azizi, Armina
    Smartz, Taylor
    Zheng, Caiwei
    Lessard, Anne-Sophie
    Panthaki, Zubin
    Oeltjen, John
    Kassira, Wrood
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 154 (02) : 224e - 232e
  • [25] Predictors of complications after direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix from a multicentre randomized clinical trial
    Negenborn, V. L.
    Dikmans, R. E. G.
    Bouman, M. B.
    Winters, H. A. H.
    Twisk, J. W. R.
    Ruhe, P. Q.
    Mureau, M. A. M.
    Smit, J. M.
    Tuinder, S.
    Hommes, J.
    Eltahir, Y.
    Posch, N. A. S.
    van Steveninck-Barends, J. M.
    Meesters-Caberg, M. A.
    van der Hulst, R. R. W. J.
    Ritt, M. J. P. F.
    Mullender, M. G.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 105 (10) : 1305 - 1311
  • [26] Evolution of the Surgical Technique for "Breast in a Day" Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Transitioning from Dual-Plane to Prepectoral Implant Placement
    Antony, Anuja K.
    Poirier, Jennifer
    Madrigrano, Andrea
    Kopkash, Katherine A.
    Robinson, Emilie C.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 143 (06) : 1547 - 1556
  • [27] Outcomes of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with Braxon® acellular dermal matrix—a single-centre experience
    Mihir Chandarana
    Soni Soumian
    Sadaf Jafferbhoy
    Sekhar Marla
    Sankaran Narayanan
    European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2019, 42 : 431 - 438
  • [28] Two-stage expander/implant breast reconstruction versus prepectoral breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: a cost analysis
    Innocenti, Alessandro
    Melita, Dario
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2022, 45 (04) : 601 - 615
  • [29] Two-stage expander/implant breast reconstruction versus prepectoral breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: a cost analysis
    Alessandro Innocenti
    Dario Melita
    European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2022, 45 : 601 - 615
  • [30] The use of porcine acellular dermal matrix in silicone implant-based breast reconstruction
    Himsl, I.
    Drinovac, V.
    Lenhard, M.
    Stoeckl, D.
    Weissenbacher, T.
    Dian, D.
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2012, 286 (01) : 187 - 192