Funnel usefulness in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction using periareolar incision with prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with acellular dermal matrix

被引:6
|
作者
Woo, Joohyun [1 ,2 ]
Seung, Ik Hyun [3 ]
Hong, Seung Eun [3 ]
机构
[1] Ewha Womans Univ, Dept Surg, Mokdong Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Ewha Womans Univ, Ewha Canc Ctr Women, Mokdong Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Ewha Womans Univ, Coll Med, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 1071 Anyangcheon Ro, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Acellular dermal matrix; Breast reconstruction; Funnel; Silicone implant; Periareolar incision; Prepectoral reconstruction; NIPPLE-SPARING MASTECTOMY; CAPSULAR CONTRACTURE; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; PATIENT; SATISFACTION; INSERTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2020.08.078
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The funnel has been used in esthetic breast surgery that requires a small incision. Recent advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques have led to more cases of nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) through periareolar incision. However, prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is almost impossible with the periareolar approach. Funnels can also be useful for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. Methods: NSM with periareolar incision and direct-to-implant breast reconstruction were performed with prepectoral implant placement between January 2017 and July 2019. The ADM full-wrapped anatomic textured implant was inserted using a funnel without additional incisions during surgery. Results: A total of 21 patients were enrolled, including 2 who received bilateral breast reconstruction. All operations were successfully performed using funnels with minimal periareolar incisions. Anatomic textured implants (mean: 251.7 cc, range: 90-450 cc) wrapped in ADM can be effectively inserted in the prepectoral plane using a funnel. Two patients experienced delayed wound healing of the areola that was treated by conservative wound management. Patients also experienced less pain overall, and the cosmetic result was very good. Patient satisfaction scores were also very high. Conclusions: While the periareolar incision is esthetically pleasing, additional resection is often necessary. However, the use of funnels ensured that no additional incision was needed even in large implants. This subsequently led to better results in terms of pain and scarring. Prepectoral breast reconstruction involving complete implant coverage with ADM using a funnel through the periareolar approach represents a good alternative to the traditional dual plane subpectoral method. This method provides good patient satisfaction without adverse outcomes. (C) 2020 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2016 / 2024
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: A new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy
    Reitsamer, Roland
    Peintinger, Florentia
    Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, 2015, 68 (02) : 162 - 167
  • [2] Prepectoral Immediate Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction with Anterior AlloDerm Coverage
    Jones, Glyn
    Yoo, Aran
    King, Victor
    Jao, Brian
    Wang, Huaping
    Rammos, Charalambos
    Elwood, Eric
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 140 (06) : 31S - 38S
  • [3] Correlation between acellular dermal matrix (ADM) volume and breast implant size selection among patients undergoing prepectoral direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction using complete ADM
    Kim, Yoon Soo
    Kim, Ho Sung
    In, Seok Kyung
    Kim, Byeong Seok
    Kim, Hyo Young
    Kim, Hong Il
    Yi, Hyung Suk
    Park, Jin Hyung
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (46) : E31344
  • [4] Outcome of complete acellular dermal matrix wrap with polyurethane implant in immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction
    Naemonitou, Foteini
    Mylvaganam, Senthurun
    Salem, Fathi
    Vidya, Raghavan
    ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2020, 47 (06): : 567 - 573
  • [5] Immediate direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: Evaluation of complications and safety
    Kalstrup, Julie
    Willert, Cecilie Balslev
    Weitemeyer, Marie Brinch-Moller
    Chakera, Annette Hougaard
    Holmich, Lisbet Rosenkrantz
    BREAST, 2021, 60 : 192 - 198
  • [6] A comparison of clinical outcomes of acellular dermal matrix with and without radiation sterilization process in immediate prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction
    Han, Woo Yeon
    Han, Seong John
    Kim, Eun Key
    Han, Hyun Ho
    Eom, Jin Sup
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2023, 87 : 461 - 466
  • [7] Acellular Dermal Matrix-sparing Direct-to-implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction A Comparative Study Including Cost Analysis
    Viezel-Mathieu, Alex
    Alnaif, Nayif
    Aljerian, Albaraa
    Safran, Tyler
    Brabant, Gordon
    Boileau, Jean-Francois
    Dionisopoulos, Tassos
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 84 (02) : 139 - 143
  • [8] Acellular dermal matrix in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: univariate and multivariate analysis on potential risk factors
    Hansen, Laura
    Paulsen, Jakob Felbo
    Hemmingsen, Mathilde Nejrup
    Herly, Mikkel
    Bredgaard, Rikke
    Gramkow, Christina S.
    Vester-Glowinski, Peter Viktor
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, 47 (01)
  • [9] Aesthetic Limitations in Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction
    Safran, Tyler
    Al-Badarin, Faris
    Al-Halabi, Becher
    Viezel-Mathieu, Alex
    Dionisopoulos, Tassos
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 150 (01) : 22E - 31E
  • [10] Implant breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix
    Gamboa-Bobadilla, GM
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2006, 56 (01) : 22 - 25