An in vitro study into the effect of a limited range of denture cleaners on surface roughness and removal of Candida albicans from conventional heat-cured acrylic resin denture base material

被引:79
作者
Harrison, Z
Johnson, A
Douglas, CWI
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Clin Dent, Dept Adult Dent Care, Sheffield S10 2TA, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Sheffield, Sch Clin Dent, Dept Oral Pathol, Sheffield S10 2TA, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
denture cleaners; surface roughness; acrylic resin; denture base material; candida albicans;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01250.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This study evaluated the abrasiveness of four denture cleaners on the surface of denture base material and assessed their ability to remove Candida albicans. Acrylic resin discs 20 mm diameter and 2 mm thick were identically produced and polished. Four cleaners were evaluated: conventional toothpaste; toothpaste with stain remover; denture cleaning paste and an immersion type cleaner, and water were used as control. These were used at dilutions of 1:1, 1:2 and 1:3 with water. An electric toothbrush was used, and the discs cleaned to simulate 1 years' cleaning. The surface roughness of the discs were then measured, before and after cleaning, using a stylus profilometer, then inoculated with 1.2 x 10(6)C. albicans cells. The effectiveness of the denture cleaners to remove C. albicans cells was assessed following a single cleaning event. The immersion cleaner was significantly less abrasive than paste cleaners (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between any dilutions for any cleaner used (P > 0.05). Immersion and paste cleaners removed almost all recoverable C. albicans from the discs, as cleaning with water alone was less effective (P < 0.05). An immersion type cleaner was found to be the most suitable cleaner because of its low abrasivity and effective removal of organic debris.
引用
收藏
页码:460 / 466
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] BARBAKOW F, 1987, QUINTESSENCE INT, V18, P17
  • [2] *BRIT STAND I, 1981, 5136 BRIT STAND I
  • [3] COMPARISON OF THE ANTIMICROBIAL CAPABILITY OF AN ABRASIVE PASTE AND CHEMICAL-SOAK DENTURE CLEANERS
    DILLS, SS
    OLSHAN, AM
    GOLDNER, S
    BROGDON, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1988, 60 (04) : 467 - 470
  • [4] THE EFFICACY OF DENTURE-CLEANSING AGENTS
    GHALICHEBAF, M
    GRASER, GN
    ZANDER, HA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1982, 48 (05) : 515 - 520
  • [5] Harrison A, 1997, Prim Dent Care, V4, P21
  • [6] Haselden CA, 1998, J ORAL REHABIL, V25, P335
  • [7] THE ABRASION OF ACRYLIC RESIN BY CLEANING PASTES
    HEATH, JR
    DAVENPORT, JC
    JONES, PA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 1983, 10 (02) : 159 - 175
  • [8] Jagger DC, 2002, INT J PROSTHODONT, V15, P549
  • [9] Kulak Y, 1997, J ORAL REHABIL, V24, P209
  • [10] Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents
    Mah, TFC
    O'Toole, GA
    [J]. TRENDS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 9 (01) : 34 - 39