Perceptions and assessment of soil fertility by farmers in the mid-hills of Nepal

被引:70
作者
Desbiez, A
Matthews, R [1 ]
Tripathi, B
Ellis-Jones, J
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Inst Water & Environm, Silsoe MK45 4DT, Beds, England
[2] Agr Res Stn Lumle, Pokhara, Nepal
[3] Silsoe Res Inst, Silsoe MK45 4HS, Beds, England
关键词
soil fertility; indicators; farmer perceptions; soil colour; weeds;
D O I
10.1016/j.agee.2003.10.003
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
To design more appropriate research and to facilitate communication with farmers, researchers need to understand farmers' knowledge, perceptions and assessments of soil fertility. To address this issue for the mid-hills of western Nepal, semi-structured interviews were conducted in 68 households to gain insight into soil fertility management practices, local methods used to assess the fertility status of a field, and perceived trends in soil fertility. Thirty-three farmers were then asked to identify fertile and infertile fields. Characteristics of these fields in terms of the indicators mentioned in the interviews were recorded, and soil samples were taken for chemical analysis in a laboratory. Data were stratified according to altitude and type of field, khet (irrigated) and bari (rainfed). A total of 62 indicators was found to be used by farmers to evaluate and monitor soil fertility, which were classified into five categories: those relating to soil characteristics, crop performance, agricultural management, environmental factors, and biology. There was good agreement between farmers' assessment of the soil fertility status of a field and a number of these indicators, particularly soil colour and weed abundance, which were examined in more detail. The soil chemical analysis also corresponded well with farmers assessment of soil fertility. Farmers' perceptions of soil fertility were found to be more 'holistic' than those of researchers, as they included factors they felt influenced the soils and crop growth in their fields. The term 'field fitness' is proposed as it conveys farmers' perceptions more accurately than 'soil fertility' alone. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 206
页数:16
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
ACHARYA GP, 2000, 20008 AGR RES STAT L
[2]  
Ambouta Jean-Marie Karimou, 1998, Cahiers Agricultures, V7, P395
[3]  
BANNINK JF, 1974, WEEDS ENV INDICATORS
[4]   TROPICAL FLOODPLAIN AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS IN MID-ORINOCO RIVER BASIN, VENEZUELA [J].
BARRIOS, E ;
HERRERA, R ;
VALLES, JL .
AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 1994, 28 (02) :143-157
[5]  
Corbeels M., 2000, MANAGING AFRICAS SOI, V10, pii
[6]   Local knowledge in the assessment of resource sustainability: Case studies in Himachal Pradesh, India, and British Columbia, Canada [J].
Duffield, C ;
Gardner, JS ;
Berkes, F ;
Singh, RB .
MOUNTAIN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 1998, 18 (01) :35-49
[7]   Weedy fields and forests: interactions between land use and the composition of plant communities in the Peruvian Amazon [J].
Fujisaka, S ;
Escobar, G ;
Veneklaas, EJ .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 78 (02) :175-186
[8]   Soil suitability classification by farmers in southern Rwanda [J].
Habarurema, E ;
Steiner, KG .
GEODERMA, 1997, 75 (1-2) :75-87
[9]  
HOLZNER W, 1971, Bodenkultur, V22, P397
[10]  
IRINGU JW, 1996, P 5 SCI C KEN AGR RE